DIABOLICAL WAR AGAINST BABIES: Not just after birth, but to keep them from being conceived and brought to term

This is a WAR AGAINST G-D HIMSELF, who commanded “Be fruitful and multiply.”

BS”D

The contents of this article (aside from my introductory remarks) are copy-pasted from a combination of three separate articles by “A Midwestern Doctor.” See doctor’s link at end for original articles. There are some portions that I chose to highlight.

This war is being fought by the enemies of G-d on every possible front!

He keeps bringing more things to light through good messengers so that we can raise awareness and help others also stand on His side against the evil.

Today a substack article from “A Midwestern Doctor” caught my eye in my email, which turned into a journey of reading and watching.. and becoming very sad.

But there’s no option of hiding like an ostrich. We NEED to KNOW the truth.

In this case, the truth is that the wicked have been OBSESSED with population control for a very long time, and have cruelly sterilized many women in Africa and other places with HCG-laced tetanus vaccines (as well as Depo-Provera shots), without their knowledge and against their will.

I knew this already, but watching this new documentary with real people in it made everything so much more real, personal, and so sad. And the fact that we are currently being targeted in a similar way by the depopulation-crazed maniacs, with the coronavirus vaccines, is all too obvious.

Here is an excerpt from the article (a note the doctor received from someone who read a previous post):

“My wife is Kenyan and sometime around 15 years ago, when she was still a teenager, she was forced to take one of those “tetanus” vaccines. She and another student who had refused were cornered in a room and forcibly administered the shot. Nearly every one of her school mates whom she is still in touch with have developed some sort of fertility-related problem, and difficulty bringing a baby to full term. My wife herself has had multiple miscarriages. horribly painful and several weeks-long menstrual cycles, sudden death of the baby in the womb, and more. We have one baby who lived. The doctor who delivered her via emergency Csection said he had never seen anything like it....everything was going wrong, the baby stopped developing early on.....our daughter is now 5 and is normal in every way, but it is a miracle.

The girls from her village who were too poor for school fees were spared the vaccine, and they haven’t had any problem conceiving or giving birth.

This horror is still going on in Kenya, now with the Covid shots.”

If you don’t have time to read the very long excerpts I pasted in from the doctor’s meticulously researched articles, (VERY HIGHLY RECOMMENDED), here is a summary the doctor provided:

“•Despite widespread protest against the surreptitious campaigns that often forced them to stop, the WHO always restarted the campaigns once everyone let their guard down.

•Once again, the primary obstacle to sterilizing vaccinations has always been their technological feasibility.

•Many of these approaches were initially developed through animal research and wildlife management. Pfizer’s CEO previously worked in this field and there is a good case to be made the common people are viewed not that differently from livestock by the global rulership.

•Many people you know have likely have already been affected by these sterilizing vaccines.

•The scientific community went from decades of denying this could ever happen to euphemistically labelling it “immunocontraception.”

•There are many signs the mRNA vaccines were designed to adversely affect fertility.”

“Recently, Andrew Wakefield and RFK completed a 28 minute documentary about that sterilizing campaign in Kenya. I feel this is an immensely valuable documentary to watch because it reflects many of the themes outlined in this article, the producers provided irrefutable proof it happened alongside effectively portraying the human cost of this campaign, and the documentary is short enough that more neutral parties who have not formed a position on these vaccines can receive its message.”

Here is the video: https://infertilitymovie.org/a-diabolical-agenda/

“Additionally, if you scroll down the page, there is also an hour long roundtable discussion on the topic you can watch.”

(THERE IS A TRANSCRIPT OF THE VIDEO FOR ANYONE UNABLE TO WATCH IT, PROVIDED AT THE VERY END OF THIS ARTICLE.)

Here are the extensive excerpts from the 3 substack articles of “A Midwestern Doctor”. (Link to the latest one, which contains the other two, at end of article.)

THANK YOU!!! to “A Midwestern Doctor” for your extensive research. I hope that people will use this as an introduction and subscribe to the doctor’s amazing substack.

TIP: I know it’s long, but maybe you can print this article and read it piece by piece when you have time, because there are SO many CRITICAL pieces of information in it.

“The Depopulation Agenda:

“When you study the history of the world, it becomes very clear the Western ruling elite (along with other leaderships) has had a pathologic obsession with population control and eugenics for centuries. In my own research, I have been able to trace this philosophy infecting the Western rulership as far back as the 1700s, and there have been countless examples of campaigns to sterilize or euthanize undesirable members of the population since then.

“I attempted to objectively summarize this immensely complex and emotionally charged subject here (focusing primarily on sterilization initiatives rather than overt and stealth euthanasia programs):

“When the COVID vaccine program began, I—and likely many others—suspected the COVID vaccines would have an “unexpected” side effect of reducing fertility.  Early in their development, Mike Yeadon (and others) at great personal risk publicly warned regulators of a clear fertility danger inherent to the vaccine (found in section IX of their petition).

Subsequent regulatory document leaks from the European FDA revealed Pfizer exempted themselves from testing the key areas of concern (infertility, autoimmunity and cancer) in animals.  This highly unusual moved further suggested serious problems existed in these three areas (as you can’t find something if you don’t test for it).

Despite repeated denials, signs of each of these key complications from the vaccine have now emerged.  While I do not have every piece of the puzzle—there are likely many “population control initiatives” I’ve never heard of—I know enough to paint a clear picture of this dirty business. 

The first half of this two-part article will lay out the historical precedent of using any means necessary to reduce the population, while the second part will examine how this has been attempted with vaccinations. 

Beliefs of Population Control

As best as I can tell, there are three overlapping schools of thought that have created the zealous belief in a need for population control. 

            1. Many governments, especially those in the East, have adopted the viewpoint that periodic wars are necessary for the stability of the society.  This viewpoint primarily arises from social instability caused by too many young adult males in the state coupled with the issues that occur when there is insufficient food available to the population. In turn, many wars have been fought specifically for this reason. (I am most familiar with this being a common theme in China, as they have observed over the centuries the one thing that will create rebellions are famines.)

Following World War 2, the Western ruling elite came to a consensus that the war approach was no longer tenable due to the extreme collateral infrastructure and environmental damage modern weaponry (ie. nukes) created. There are only two exceptions to this rule:

     Wars in third-world countries lacking modern weaponry, where collateral damage was inconsequential to first-world countries.

     Talks that occurred within the Chinese military leadership, but have so far not materialized, over starting a war with India so both countries could mutually alleviate their challenging population burden. For context, China has attempted population control with their “one-child” policy, but it has been met with mixed success and widespread social resistance.

The alternative to war is a multipronged attack that seeks every possible avenue to reduce fertility and accelerate aging, which many argue is the more humane option of the two.  One of the curious facts I have observed over the decades is how frequently an odd policy or environmental agent always seems to converge on the common pathway of reducing population.  Once or twice, you can write it up as a coincidence, but at a certain point, you have to wonder if it is all intentional.

“When I studied the early history of infectious diseases (discussed in my previous articles on smallpox), one of the most striking things to me was the absolute squalor the serfs were forced into as the feudal lords kicked them off the land to live in the early cities.  It was much worse than most people of this modern era can even conceive of. 

“When I first learned of this, I guessed this must have been viewed as a necessary trade off by the European rulership to support the Industrial Revolution, which was vital for national development.  After I learned about the Malthusian philosophy, I realized the abhorrent living situations was likely the goal in of itself. 

In 1798, Rev. Thomas R Malthus published the influential work An Essay on the Principle of Population, which argued that human populations tend to increase at a geometrical (exponential) rate, but the means of subsistence (food) grows at only an arithmetic (linear) rate.  "The power of population is indefinitely greater than the power of the earth to produce subsistence for man," according to Malthus, who therefore believed the standard of living of the masses could not be improved without the checks of war, famine, or disease. In their absence, population would increase by a geometric rate and lead to a catastrophic “Malthusian” food supply collapse. 

While there are numerous errors in his theory, Malthus was appointed to multiple important positions, and his ideas appear to have gradually become a prevailing conviction among members of the ruling classes in the 19th century. These ideas also influenced other key figures, such as Charles Darwin as he created his theory of evolution and natural selection. 

Numerous groups were founded over the decades, which emphasized birth control and increasing mortality of the poor.  These groups included Dr. George Drysdale's Elements of Social Science in 1854, the Malthusian League in 1877, and Margret Sanger’s National Birth Control League in 1915, which became the Planned Parenthood Federation of America in 1942.  Initially these groups were domestic, but gradually they became global where they tied international aid and development to population control measures. 

The Malthusian and Darwinian ideals gradually gave birth to Social Darwinism and Eugenics, which were widely adopted by the ruling elite.  Social Darwinism argued that class divisions were the will of nature and that this form of natural selection, rather than being evil, was necessary.  The most extreme version of this ideology, eugenics, appears to have arisen from two key factors:

1.     The tribal nature of human beings and the tendency to view all other tribes as inferior (the ruling class felt this way towards the poor).

2.     The advances of society were making it possible for many of the weaker members of society, who previously would have died off, to survive long enough to reproduce and, over time, significantly weaken the gene pool.

Eugenics in turn advocated preventing those who were less “fit” from breeding.  This has been responsible for horror upon horror since its inception, and it provided the theoretical foundation for why, among other things, the Nazis forcibly sterilized the mentally ill.  In many cases, programs with more immediate results were also implemented.  While most are aware of the millions executed by Hitler, other dictators such as Pol-Pot, Joseph Stalin, and Mao Zedong arguably did even worse.  A lead researcher in this field coined the term “democide” and estimates these governments executed approximately 150 million people in the previous century.  When the Nazis eventually were tried at Nuremberg for their crimes against humanity, few know that that many cited the fact similar actions were first conducted by the “Great United States” in their defense. 

For example, consider one of the more problematic Supreme Court rulings, Jacobson vs. Massachusetts.  It held that Jacobson, who having previously suffered a severe adverse reaction from a smallpox vaccine which led him to contest Massachusetts’ smallpox booster mandate, did not have the right to refuse forced vaccination. 

Following this ruling, Virginia passed a law authorizing the involuntary sterilization of people the deemed to be "feeble-minded," or mentally ill.  Citing Jacobson vs. Massachusetts, a Supreme Court Justice wrote: "The principle that sustains compulsory vaccination is broad enough to cover cutting the Fallopian tubes."  By 1930, dozens of states were forcing women to undergo involuntary sterilization, and more than 60,000 American women were sterilized by the government against their will.

While books could be written on the horrors of eugenics, the key point to remember is that the discipline never disappeared and has enjoyed sustained support from the upper class.  Did you know that the creators of the dangerous AstraZeneca COVID vaccine—which has been promoted as the vaccine of choice for the third world—have extensive ties to major eugenics organizations?  I wish I was making this up.

One of the major shifts that has appeared within these movements has been who they target. Until recently, they seemed to be racist against specific sets of people, primarily those of color. Planned Parenthood’s founder, for example, wanted to reduce the black birth rate. Eugenics was also conducted by whites against other whites, however it typically was due to class differences or perceived genetic quality rather than race (the only exception I can think of was the British Empire towards the Irish). This all seems to have shifted recently to where the healthy and affluent white members of society are now being targeted too.  As this is a new change, much of the western population has been caught off guard, and there has been a much higher COVID vaccination uptake in whites than other races who remember being targeted by their government.

Governmental Planning for Population Control

Numerous documents and conferences (a few of which will be discussed) suggest population control has also been a priority for both national governments and international governments.

National Security Study Memorandum 200 is the most well-known authentic government document advancing a systematic population control agenda.  Written in 1974 by Kissinger during Nixon’s presidency (and unclassified decades later), it identified thirdworld population growth as a critical national security issue for the United States and outlined a variety of steps to combat it.

Population control has also been discussed within the public media. The 9/4/94 Associated Press article "Compromise near on Population Control Plan" stated:

“On the eve of the opening of the United Nations Population Conference in Cairo, a U. S. official said that a compromise on the sensitive issues of abortion and birth control was "very close."…During three preparatory conferences, delegates from 170 countries agreed on more than 90% of the plan for controlling population.”

(My note: The author mentions other such documents whose veracity the author hasn’t been able to verify, so I left them out of this excerpt.)

Mechanisms of Population Control

As best as I can tell, population control measures typically follow one of three approaches:

1. Create social changes that discourage having children.
2. Introduce an environmental factor that decreases male testosterone and sperm viability.
3. Directly sterilize (or give birth control to) women of childbearing age.

Social Approaches:

The first approach is a politically touchy subject.  I will cite a few quick examples:
•Second Wave Feminism transitioned a significant portion of the population from raising families at home to a sterile existence working outside the home.  Second Wave Feminism…..corrected many serious injustices towards women, but there is also some evidence to suggest the movement was hijacked to help the upper class by removing women from a motherly role and doubling the workforce. For example a pioneer of this movement, Gloria Steinem who strongly discouraged being a housewife, was also a CIA operative.
•The societal messages around dating have been shifted from romantic bonding (which produces children) to a hookup culture without intimacy.
•Women are strongly encouraged to pursue a career before having children or a family, which frequently results in them missing the opportunity to do so.
•Previously rare pairings that either cannot or are unlikely to produce children are actively encouraged by the media and corporatocracy.
•Alternatives to relationships, such as computer or video addictions, are strongly encouraged in society.
•Economically, it has become more and more difficult for individuals to afford to have children.
•Having children is labeled as environmentally destructive and hence strongly discouraged.
•Having children is now characterized as a major obstacle to spiritual growth and self-development.
•The widespread support and social validation for having children has gradually diminished.

The idea of population control or mass extinction for the greater good has also been increasingly observed within the media.  Avengers Endgame was the top grossing film of 2019, and it was so heavily promoted throughout the media that it accomplished the unique feat of almost doubling the revenue of the runner-up.  I have often wondered whether this was deliberate on account of the message the movie spread in the months immediately preceding COVID-19 of the need to be evil and eliminate half the population for the “greater good”.

There are also many factors that directly affect fertility.  Each of these appears to have followed a gradual progression like the mythof a “boiling frog” where the onset has been too slow for most of the victims to recognize.

Male Approaches:

It is almost universally agreed within the scientific literature that there has been a massive, sustained decline in male testosterone levels over the decades (a male’s testosterone levels goes hand in hand with his health and fertility).  This decline directly affects male (and to a lesser extent female) health, and numerous integrative physicians have found rectifying it creates profound benefits in a large percentage of their patients.  The decline of sperm quality and viability has also been observed, but as it is more difficult to objectively quantify, not as much as data exists to clearly support this trend. 

A common means of controlling animal populations is to universally introduce an agent which decreases male fertility (as these tend to be easier to distribute on a large-scale basis than agents which target female reproduction).  In addition, a common method of controlling animal behavior is to neuter males, as this reduces their aggression and “disobedience to authority.” (For example, a recent lawsuit was filed by a 16-year-old boy who developed breasts after he was forced to take estrogen in jail to “control his behavior.”)  It is hence understandable why those in the ruling class would be open to using similar approaches on the “useless eaters” of the population (many terms for this concept exist, including those originating from the Nazis’ eugenics program).

Many of the factors causing this decline appear to have been deliberately placed in the environment.  The most influential are xenoestrogens, artificial chemicals that mimic the characteristics of estrogen and feminize organisms.  Alex Jones’s infamous commentary on chemicals that “turn the friggin’ frogs gay,” for example, was a reference to atrazine, a still widely used herbicide, that for over 20 years has been known to create hermaphroditic frogs.  For those interested, the eight-hour audiobook, Estrogeneration: How Estrogenics Are Making You Fat, Sick, and Infertile provides an excellent summary of the topic.

Some of the most common xenoestrogens in addition to atrazine (and some other herbicides) include:
•Birth control pills, which are designed to not break down and thus cycle back into the water supply (this is a common problem in areas that reuse waste water, particularly China, where oral contraceptives are widely used).
•Soy (excluding the rare exception where it is fermented like in Miso or Natto), is a food that comprises a significant portion of the food supply.  While much less common (but sometimes still) an issue, a similar effect results from lavender products.
•Bisphenol A and S found in many plastics, which constantly contact our bodies and food.
•Phalates (also found in many plastics, I particularly care about this when sourcing IV supplies)
•Parabens (these are uses for fragrances in many cosmetic products).
•DDT and PCBs are highly dangerous mutagenic chemicals.  Despite their known toxicity (Monsanto, the initial PCB producer, saw within three years 23 of their 24 researchers develop disfigured faces) it took decades, and in some cases almost a century of activism, to remove them from the market.  Massive amounts of these chemicals were produced, and they persist in the environment, accumulate up the food chain (especially via fish), and still affect people today.  In addition to being destructive to both humans and wildlife, a good case can be made these chemicals created many of the changes we are still seeing today (such as the decline of male sperm counts).

While it is appreciated that increasing estrogen levels will directly feminize males, it is less appreciated that there are estrogen receptors in the brain that reduce testosterone levels when stimulated.  Clomifene, a drug designed for inducing ovulation (either for patients who cannot ovulate, or to collect eggs for IVF) blocks this anti-testosterone receptor. Direct testosterone administration can be used for male health, however, many physicians also find significant benefit from using clomifene, as it alone can raise testosterone, and in many cases treat male infertility. This (and many pieces of evidence) suggest xenoestrogens play a key role in the male decline of testosterone. 

One of the largest influences on testicular function is microwave radiation (emitted by cell phones and Wi-Fi enabled devices).  Brain matter, the heart, and the testicles are the most susceptible tissues in the body to this microwave radiation (for those curious, there is actually a lot of research proving this). 

Microwave field strength (per the inverse square law) exponentially decreases from its source, and a frequently successful approach for treating male infertility is to avoid carrying a phone in the pocket or using a laptop near the lap.  While I am not familiar with the effects of this radiation on the ovaries, it has been shown that microwave field strength increases within the uterus rather than decreases as would be expected (the uterus is a fascinating organ) and that some degree of correlation between birth defects and prenatal EMF exposure exists.

Many other factors also influence testosterone levels and fertility.  Two of the more interesting examples are metformin, a very commonly used medication for diabetes that has the curious side effect of reducing testosterone (which can be debilitating for older men who are already deficient in testosterone), and the widely used sugar replacement stevia, which has been repeatedly studied for its testosterone reducing and contraceptive properties. This all goes in a full circle as these many of these substances also interfere with metabolism thereby creating obesity, and fat cells via aromatase further perpetuate the cycle by turning testosterone to estrogen.

To tie this all together, Niels E. Skakkebæk, MD PhD, an expert in testicular cancer, has shown through Denmark’s national cancer registry (maintained since 1943) that the rate of testicular cancer more than tripled from 1943 to 1993 and continues to grow since that time. At the same time, he also found sperm density fell from 113 million per milliliter in 1940 to 66 million per milliliter in 1990 and that the volume of sperm has dropped an average of 19%. 

Female Approaches:

While male sterilization methods tend to be uniformly administered throughout the environment, due to mammalian biology, female sterilization typically requires more targeted approaches.  The only exception I know of to this rule occurred in India in the 1970s, where their prime minister in return for international loans declared martial law and with military force mandated vasectomies, gruesomely sterilizing six million men before being forced to abandon this initiative due to violent male counterprotest (hence why only women are directly targeted for sterilization).

Sterilization through vaccination has long been viewed as the holy grail of population control, as global faith in vaccination allows the covert mass administration of sterilizing substances, and unlike many other methods, in theory it only needs to be done once.  As such, a lot of research has been done in this area, but at least until recently, the technology for it was lacking.  To fully understand the context of that approach, we will first review what has been done with the forced administration of traditional contraceptive and sterilizing technologies.

While the Nazis, who forcefully sterilized or executed millions they deemed unfit to breed, are history’s most notorious offenders, many sterilization campaigns have been forcibly conducted by governments around the world against poor women of color.  One of the best-known examples occurred in the United States from the 1960s to the 1970s.  There, the Indian Health Services, through force and deceit, sterilized between 25% to 40% of the female native American population via tubal ligations and hysterectomies, resulting in a halving of their birth rate.

Other examples include:
•40,000 women that were sterilized in Colombia between 1963-65 by Rockefeller-funded programs. 
•A million women were sterilized in Brazil between 1965-1971.
•A U.S.-imposed population control program administered by the Peace Corps in Bolivia sterilized Quechua Indian women without their knowledge or consent.

In our current era, the labor value of individual human beings has been significantly decreased by modern technology (particularly in the recent times with AI and Robotics).  From many publications I’ve read, it appears that the Oligarchy now holds the perspective that the productive value our current population level offers has become outweighed by the costs of having that many people.

  The second part of this article discusses the various ways vaccinations have been used to affect fertility. 

It is my belief that vaccines represent the ideal form of population control because they are very easy to administer, they can provide long-term or permanent sterilization and the blind public faith in vaccination prevents most people from ever questioning sterilization done under the guise of “public health.” I am not the only person who realized this and the Western Elite (currently led by the WHO and Bill Gates) have spent decades attempting to develop sterilizing vaccines.

There is clear evidence forced trials of sterilizing vaccines have been repeatedly occurring over the decades. As such, it was reasonable to assume that the Eugenicists would not let an opportunity like the Covid vaccines to go to waste, and there was a real possibility that something was present in the mRNA vaccines that would cause sterility or death.
If you wish to know more on the subject for forced sterilization campaigns by the WHO, I would highly recommend reading Chapter 10 of The Real Anthony Fauci. It also researched this topic, but goes into much greater detail in many areas and provides supporting references.

In the past, these programs typically targeted the poor, people of color, colonial subjects and those with genetic defects that were considered dangerous to the country’s gene pool.

In recent times, the targeted demographic appears to have been expanded to include most of the Western population.  Because of this, groups (that you, dear reader, likely belong to) that were not typically targeted for population reduction in the past now are.  We are all the prey now.

Given that vaccines are unconditionally trusted by most people and are very easy to administer, if a vaccination could produce sterilization or at least reduce fertility from a single injection, it would provide a technological solution to a dilemma the ruling class has faced for over a century.  The only possible superior alternative I can think of would be a highly contagious respiratory virus (or “self-spreading vaccine”) that impaired future fertility without otherwise causing too much damage (and to some extent has been observed in men after COVID-19).

As a result, methods of making fertility-impairing vaccines have been repeatedly researched.  Each of the candidate vaccines I was able to identify worked in a similar manner: they carried an antigen that was similar to a protein necessary for fertilization or pregnancy, and thus created an autoimmune response that impaired fertility.

There are basically two ways this can be done.  The first is to produce the needed antigen and mix it with an immunostimulatory adjuvant.  The second is to genetically engineer an infectious organism that has the antigen within it, and as with rheumatic fever, the damage to fertility will occur because the immune system is programmed to fight this pathogen.

In the previous article on the military’s anthrax vaccination program, I discussed a class of bioweapons originally developed by Russia that spliced necessary human tissue onto infectious organisms to create a time-delayed autoimmune bioweapon.  One of the curious aspects of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein is that it has a high number of similarities with normal human tissue, which I suspect may have been deliberately engineered in the virus to cause severe autoimmunity.

A friend who worked in this field was at the site of the original SARS outbreak in Canada and told me they were relatively certain the original SARS outbreak was an accidental lab leak.  As that virus is very easy to modify and is an excellent delivery platform, they said it has been a favorite subject for everyone in the field to mess around with engineering.  From the start of this pandemic, they were also positive SARS-CoV-2 was artificial (which was painfully obvious from the gene sequence), but like many others they did not publish their views for fear of retaliation.

Due to the long history of population control measures and the ruling class’s increasing need to develop an effective tool for it, I suspected the COVID vaccines would eventually be found to reduce fertility. After all, this was a once in a lifetime opportunity I could not see the eugenicists would let themselves miss. 

Early on Dr. Mike Yeadon recognized an overlap in the spike protein with a protein necessary for maintaining a pregnancy (Syncytin-1) created a clear risk for fertility.  At great personal risk, he filed a formal petition to the regulators to protect women of childbearing age in the initial vaccine trials. His concerns were not addressed and subsequent regulatory document leaks from the European FDA revealed Pfizer exempted themselves from testing the fertility risk, something that is typically always required. 

Once the vaccine emerged on the market, it was discovered that one of the most common effects was severe disturbances and alterations to women’s menstrual cycles.  This side effect was initially denied by every medical authority (it does not occur with other vaccines), but eventually acknowledged and rationalized as being an insignificant manifestation of inflammation (so once again “that means the vaccine is working”). 

I initially wondered if these changes were due to varying degrees of clotting in the body (in Chinese medicine, blood stasis is the main cause of menstrual abnormalities, and many vaccinated patients reported massive clots during their menstrual cycle none of us had seen prior to these vaccines).  Later, when a Japanese FOIA request was approved, biodistribution studies of the lipid nanoparticle (containing the vaccine mRNA) became available for review and showed they concentrated in the ovaries.  This is very unusual and raises the possibility that the lipid nanoparticle may have been designed for this purpose.

Since the ovaries regulate the menstrual cycle, this suggested that menstrual changes were a result of the vaccine creating some type of disturbance in the ovaries, which was a much more plausible explanation than simply saying “oh, it must be coming from general inflammation.”  This also made me worry that some type of permanent change was being created in the eggs with an ensuing effect that would take decades to show up (many potential health issues come to mind).  The only related precedent I can even think of for this was DES, a now banned estrogen analog that was widely prescribed to pregnant mothers (ironically to prevent complications in pregnancy).  DES had many side effects including alteration of genitalia and an increased risk for cancer decades later in the fetus’s life.

While I have some experience working in drug development and with regulators, Dr. Yeadon has significantly more experience than me, and with his permission I will quote him:

I was just reflecting on my first encounters with the fundamental design points of the leading c19 “vaccines”. I focused on mRNA because I believed that to be the most dangerous option. The industry had spent years trying to make this a viable mode of treatment and had not overcome several serious barriers. One was that mRNA wasn’t stable & would get broken down quickly. Another was that it was nearly impossible to get cells to take up the mRNA without violent processes involving electrical fields or toxic chemicals. Why would that be? Consider that the integrity of your genetic complement is the most important thing to pass to your progeny. No wonder your cells have multiple defense mechanisms to prevent alien genetic codes invading them.

So the mRNA “vaccine” companies chemically altered the ribose nucleic acid bases so these aren’t even natural bases. They also wrapped up the mRNA in special lipids to help fool your immune system & allow an alien install.

All that looks risky & nowhere near long enough was given to look for unwanted effects. Even though they planned to inject BILLIONS who didn’t even need it, and even that only if they worked (which they don’t....so they’ve lied about efficacy, as real-world numbers are nothing like the trial claims).

But recently, I’ve realized they’ve all made appalling errors and they all made the same errors. That’s not possible to happen if they were competing honestly.

1. They picked the most dangerous part of the virus to express, the spike protein. We now know that most of the serious complications arise from the toxicity of spike. Why did all four choose this piece? This is 13% of the gene sequences, so there were plenty of other options.

2. They’ve picked the genetically most unstable part of the virus. That’s just stupid, and had they not done so, they couldn’t have played the “new variant claim”. Was that why they picked it?

3. They’ve picked the least dissimilar part from numerous other human proteins. That maximizes the risk of auto immune reactions.

The more you look at it, the more it looks like collusion to injure people.

By the way, there have now been really comprehensive studies of how human immune systems deal with infections like this. Only 10% of immune responses in your extensive “immune repertoire” is directed to spike protein. All the rest go to other parts of the pathogen. Coincidence? I don’t think so.

My initial hypothesis during the COVID rollout was that the mRNA vaccines would be pushed through and everything else would be thrown under the bus (which is largely what happened) due to the trillions of dollars to be made from opening up the mRNA market.  Since the mRNA products were too unsafe to give to humans outside of the unprecedented “emergency” situation created through unnecessary lockdowns, commercial interests dictated that this window would be used to the maximum extent possible. 

I also had two alternative hypothesizes.  The first was that mRNA vaccines were going to be used as some type of Malthusian tool to reduce the population.  The second was that the Chinese military had designed the Sars-CoV-2 so that the most likely vaccine candidate, a vector that mass produced spike proteins, would be the actual weapon and would end up being deployed in enemy territory and allow the country to self-destruct from within.  It should be noted that while China also developed these vaccines, they were never deployed and traditional vaccination platforms were used for its citizenry instead.

At this time, I feel each hypothesis is still quite likely to be true, and the purpose of this article series is to introduce the evidence for the Malthusian interpretation Dr. Yeadon hints at in his commentary.  Lastly, while I believe it is likely the virus was deliberately engineered to create significant autoimmunity (a key characteristic of both COVID-19 infections and vaccine injuries), it is much harder to know if it was specifically engineered to reduce the fertility of those infected or was an early prototype for a virus that will be able to do this.

We will now review each of the vaccinations I have identified that appear to have contributed to reduced fertility.  Each has most of the following characteristics:

•A tendency to produce autoimmunity to a protein necessary for pregnancy
•An unusual dosing schedule
•Distributed to all women of childbearing age
•Coercive and forceful measures are implemented that ensure a high rate of vaccination uptake.

Sound familiar?

We will now review the following vaccinations:

•Whole Cell Pertussis Vaccines
•hCG Vaccines
•The HPV Vaccine
•The Anthrax Vaccine
•The Porcine zona pellucida contraceptive vaccine

Whole Cell Pertussis Vaccines

The Tetanus-Diptheria-Pertussis vaccine has a very questionable past.  Due a petty squabble between England and Ireland that originally arose over an English King wanting a divorce, the English treated the Irish terribly.  Irish orphanages in multiple cases were used as testing grounds for experimental vaccinations. 

In 2014, unmarked mass graves belonging to Irish orphans were discovered.  Further research revealed these graves belonged to a group of 2,051 children on which an early and dangerous diphtheria vaccine was covertly tested on in the 1930s.  This unethical human experimentation on Irish children (including infants and handicapped children) continued at least through the 1960s and 1970s at Irish care homes, where a separate investigation found early Tetanus, Diptheria and Pertussis vaccinations were covertly tested on these children.

The whole cell pertussis vaccine (given in combination with tetanus and diptheria) developed through these programs was problematic.  Physicians at the time observed that sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) did not exist prior to introduction of the vaccine, and infant death always happened in correlation with vaccination.  I have seen a variety of different resources on exact timing of SIDS, but most references state that 90% of SIDS occurs between 2-4 months of age, and the 3 doses of the DTP vaccine are typically given at 2, 4 and 6 months of age. 

The evidence that most strongly supports this hypothesis came from the initial COVID lockdowns.  Many people in the conventional medical community predicted that infants not coming in for their well child (vaccine) visits would be severely harmed.  In contrast, individuals in the vaccine safety movement predicted before the data was even available that this was a once in a lifetime opportunity to see a reduction in SIDS.  A reduction in SIDS did occur, alongside an unprecedented decline in premature births (which are also linked to vaccination).

In addition to SIDS, the DTP vaccine was known for causing brain damage, and to some extent is correlated with increasing crime and ADHD rates (both of which are often reflective of brain damage).  The brain damage issue was quite common (two children within my extended family for example experienced these complications) and a torrent of lawsuits were filed against the manufacturer in the 1980s.  Since the legal cost of these lawsuits exceeded the revenue from vaccination, that litigation situation served as the basis for the creation of National Vaccine Injury Program. 

The program was intended to be a compromise between consumer advocates in Congress creating support for parents who were facing unreasonable difficulties in the courts and the manufacturers who needed a way to be able to continue producing vaccines.  Fauci played a key role in brokering this deal, and the program rapidly drifted from its original vision to one that protected vaccine manufacturers from all legal liability.  This led to a gold rush to add more unsafe vaccines to the vaccine schedule.  An explosion of chronic autoimmune and neurologic illnesses (such as autism) followed not long afterwards within the population (the Real Anthony Fauciprovides an excellent summary of these changes). 

There were two ways the DTP combination vaccine could be manufactured: a “whole cell” pertussis preparation (DTwP), or an “acellular” pertussis preparation (DTaP).  The trade-off is that although the whole cell preparation is more effective in preventing disease, it is also more likely to cause severe adverse events.  The secondary trade off relates to cost.  To quote the Journal of the Medical Association: “Although DTaP vaccines are associated with significantly fewer adverse events, they are more expensive than DTwP.”

Given that context, see if you can guess what happened next…

Due to the mass public outcry in America against this vaccine, the “safer” DTaP was used in the U.S., while the DTwP was sent to Africa where it continues to be widely used to this day.

There are 3 vaccines that are considered the cornerstone of all global public health programs, Polio, MMR and DTP (especially DTP).  The distribution and uptake of these vaccines is hence an unquestioned priority in almost all of these programs.  Dr. Peter Aaby, a renowned vaccine scientist and promoter of vaccination, was commissioned by the WHO to study the overall effect of these vaccines on infant mortality.  For context, these types of studies are almost never conducted which is why we still do not have data to show if many of the vaccines given to children do in fact provide a net benefit.
 
The results were not what Aaby expected.  While a significant reduction in death was observed from the MMR vaccine as he had likely expected to find, the opposite effect was found for the DTP and his data suggested the program needed to be scrapped.
To quote his paper:

“DTP was associated with 5-fold higher mortality than being unvaccinated. No prospective study has shown beneficial survival effects of DTP. Unfortunately, DTP is the most widely used vaccine, and the proportion who receives DTP is used globally as an indicator of the performance of national vaccination programs.”

In another section of his paper, it is specified that the overall death rate increased by 3.93 time in boys and 9.98 time in girls (for an average of 5.00).  This has been hypothesized to explain the higher incidence of autism in boys (boys get autism while girls just die, once again the ideal effects for reducing population).

“It should be of concern that the effect of routine vaccinations on all-cause mortality was not tested in randomized trials. All currently available evidence suggests that DTP vaccine may kill more children from other causes than it saves from diphtheria, tetanus or pertussis. Though a vaccine protects children against the target disease, it may simultaneously increase susceptibility to unrelated infections.”

This is analogous to the COVID vaccines being mandated for the population to save lives from COVID despite the total number of deaths being much greater in vaccinated individuals due to circulatory disorders caused by the vaccine (which may be even higher once the long-term effects become known).  Aaby’s results were of course buried.  Since his publication, instead of being re-evaluated, the distribution of DTP has only increased, largely due to Bill Gates shifting the focus of the WHO towards vaccination (rather than public health projects that save lives).

Peter Gøtzsche MD, is one of the heroes and a critical reformer in evidence-based medicine who has repeatedly stuck his neck out to speak truth to power and end unsafe medical practices (although in general he supports vaccination).  When Gøtzsche was subsequently requested to provide a meticulous systematic review of the evidence for DTP, he concluded from the data "evidence tells us that it is likely that the DTP vaccine increases total mortality in low-income countries." 

hCG Vaccines:

One of the most studied methods of sterilization through vaccination (now euphemistically termed “immunocontraception”) is producing an immune response to hCG, which is a hormone necessary to maintain pregnancy.  This results in the immune system lowering hCG levels enough to prevent viable pregnancy.

The chronology of the hCG vaccine is very similar to that of the anthrax vaccines, as described in a previous article.
1. A significant need was present that had no viable technological solution (an effective adjuvant to enable a new generation of vaccines products versus an effective means of sterilization through vaccination).
2. A workable but problematic solution was identified (hCG added to a vaccine as opposed to squalene used as an adjuvant).
3. A large secret forced experimental campaign was conducted to develop this approach.
4. Public outcry and suspicion arose towards all the sketchy aspects of this approach.
5. The responsible authorities initially vehemently denied on all grounds that this could possibly be happening (WHO/hCG vaccine vs. the military/anthrax vaccine).
6. Independent tests were conducted and suggested the substance in question was present in the vaccines.
7. The responsible authorities back-peddled to a softer denial (the positive results were due to lab error, we have do have vaccines with this additive but we’d never use it on people, etc.).
8. Further testing proved without ambiguity that the agents were present.
9. The debate ended while unethical experimentation continued over the decades and the technology was gradually improved.
10. Use of the technology is normalized.

The more I thought about this ten-step process, the more I wondered if we are in fact at step 6 of introducing injectable nanotechnology such as graphene oxide (there is suggestive but not irrefutable evidence of its presence in the vaccines), which will eventually arrive at step 10. 

Prior to the development of more advanced approaches, hCG was typically deployed by being added to the tetanus toxoid and then administered in the tetanus vaccine.  In 1972the WHO initiated their "Special Programme" in Human Reproduction (approximately $400 million was invested in the first 20 years of the program).  Later that year WHO and Rockefeller scientists were able to present a successful prototype to the National Academy of Sciences.  A few years later, to quote The Real Anthony Fauci:

“By 1976, WHO scientists had successfully conjugated a functional “birth-control” vaccine. The WHO researchers reported triumphantly that their formula could induce “abortions in females already pregnant and/or infertility in recipients not yet impregnated.” They observed that “repeated inoculations prolong infertility.”

Experimental campaigns soon followed.  Their classic giveaways were as follows:
• A new “special” version of an existing vaccine is introduced.
•The vaccinations are only administered to women of childbearing age.
•Requiring additional doses was not needed for the regular vaccine (each campaign followed the published protocol for the WHO birth-control conjugate of tetanus toxoid linked to βhCG: five spaced doses of “TT” vaccine at six-month intervals).

In 1993, WHO announced a “birth-control vaccine” for “family planning.”  By November 1993 publications had appeared saying an abortifacient vaccine was being used as a tetanus prophylactic.  Human Life International (HLI), a Catholic pro-life organization, raised questions about it and the apparent activity of the WHO, where millions of unsuspecting women in Mexico, the Philippines, Tanzania and Nicaragua were allegedly being used as human guinea pigs in which they were injected with an anti-fertility vaccine but told it was nothing more than a tetanus vaccine.

As detailed in the June 1995 HLI Reports newsletter, when the first reports surfaced in the Phillipines, health officials at The WHO and Phillipine health agencies categorically denied that the vaccine contained hCG. When confronted with lab test evidence showing the vaccine vials contained hCG as well as laboratory evidence that there were high levels of hCG antibodies in 27 out of 30 women who had been vaccinated, WHO officials started to make excuses.

To quote the author, "first they said there was no hCG in the vaccine, then they said there was, but it was in tiny amounts. Then they said that hCG is part of the vaccine manufacturing process. Now they are saying the tests to detect hCG are flawed and produce 'a lot of false positives'. But, there is one fact that cannot be disputed. There is no known way for the vaccinated women to have hCG antibodies in their blood unless hCG had been artificially introduced into their bodies."  For reference, 30 women who received this vaccine were tested and 26 had antibodies to hCG.

As described in my previous article, this the exact same thing that happened with the anthrax vaccines and is visible within the WHO’s response to the controversy.  These types of denials are always extremely insightful once twenty years of additional information is available. 

One of the very first articles I invested a lot of time into for this substack focused on the PR industry.  I did this because it is critical to understand that whenever an unpopular public policy is proposed, instead of listening to public opinion, everyone involved lies and PR makes it possible for this approach to work and the unpopular policy to materialize. 

After the widespread outcry against the hCG vaccinations, the WHO backed off and planned “tetanus” vaccination campaigns were cancelled.  In the following years, Bill Gates initiated his campaign to buy out the WHO, and with a 10-billion-dollar investment in 2010 shifted the WHO’s focus much further towards vaccination and fertility control.

In 2013, the previously postponed tetanus vaccination campaign was finally initiated in Kenya.  This shady campaign only targeted women of childbearing age and the vaccines were not administered in a normal fashion (five doses were required with 6 months between each booster). 

The distribution was also suspicious as the sites that would typically be required to distribute the vaccines across the country did not receive them.  Instead, a centralized location received the vaccines, and they were continually guarded by police (including their empty vials).  The only other instance I can identify of a heavily guarded vaccine where samples could not be obtained for independent testing was during the early days of the COVID-19 vaccine rollout (because of an alleged critically limited supply).

Nonetheless, a small team of Kenyan Catholic Doctors were eventually able to obtain samples of the vaccines which when tested clearly showed the presence of hCG.  After repeated denials by all involved, the program was eventually terminated by Kenya’s government.

At the same time this was happening, step 9 was also being implemented.  Consider this 2011 paper:

Human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) is synthesized soon after fertilization and is essential for embryonic implantation. A vaccine targeting hCG would be an ideal choice for immuno-contraception; an anti-hCG vaccine developed by Talwar et al., has previously undergone Phase II efficacy trials, providing proof of principle. These trials established the threshold levels of bio-neutralizing anti-hCG antibody titers required to prevent pregnancy; however, these titers (>50 ng/ml) were achieved in only 80% of immunized women. In this communication, we report a novel recombinant anti-hCG vaccine which demonstrates improved immunogenecity. hCGβ was genetically fused at C-terminal to the B-subunit of E. coli heat-labile enterotoxin. The recombinant fusion protein (hCGβ-LTB) was expressed in Pichia pastoris and, upon adsorption on Alhydrogel along with Mycobacterium indicus pranii (MIP) as an immuno-modulator, evoked a very high anti-hCG immune response in 100% of immunized BALB/c mice. This recombinant vaccine is expected to reduce cost as well as facilitate production of a molecularly consistent conjugate on a large scale.

In plain language, this means that after the initial research on hCG was done, the knowledge was used to genetically engineer infectious microbes that produced sterility. This cumulation of decades of research has been studied by many researchers beyond those mentioned in the above paper.

RFK Jr. always focuses on the 1988 law that led to the establishment of the National Vaccine Injury Program because it was the turning point in America’s vaccination program that began our current era of chronic illness. The three most dangerous vaccinations developed in this new era had two characteristics in common: a frequent association with the development of severe autoimmune conditions and negative effects on fertility. 

The first one, anthrax, was covered in a previous article.  Prior to COVID-19, the second vaccine, Gardasil, was the one I considered to be the most dangerous on the market and had injured or disabled multiple people I directly knew.  The third is of course the COVID-19 vaccines.  After discussing these vaccines, I will also briefly review the Porcine Zona Pellucida vaccine.

The Anthrax Vaccine:

(the following content was not covered in the previous article)
In addition to horrific autoimmune conditions, the anthrax vaccine was also frequently associated with infertility.  To quote one reader (with their permission) who never received the vaccine or went to Iraq:
“We purposely were careful NOT to get pregnant immediately (which is common after deployments), because my husband was concerned about the shot and pills he was given during the Gulf War and his ensuing stomach issues. We soon found out that was a good call as soooo many women we knew miscarried or had still births. The few who did deliver had severely ill babies with bizarre issues, like...extreme allergies to everything, extreme skin issues, digestive abnormalities, etc... and several of those babies eventually died. This was all word of mouth as there was no internet, cell phones, or social media then. During that first year there were also several soldiers my husband knew who just dropped dead during runs from massive heart attacks.

I also heard of several people dying with bizarre cancers. For example, a civilian Dr. friend I knew told me of one woman who became almost completely covered with cancerous moles. She died a horrible death with no one knowing what she had, why, or how to treat it.”
This reader, despite being from the opposite end of the world experienced similar effects to those shared from Kenya, which once again illustrates how no one is safe from these global predators. Western medicine has a massive body count and a central argument of this substack is that those human beings represents an important, but forgotten side of medicine.

One of the most concerning aspects of the anthrax vaccine was its tendency to affect the family and future children of the vaccinated soldier, and in many cases, the shedding which was “theoretically impossible” was quite severe (inexplicable shedding appears to also occur with the COVID-19 vaccine, but is less severe than what occurred following Anthrax vaccination).  For example, the family of the reader quoted above (particularly the children) experienced continual severe or life-threatening health issues that are still occurring today.

There are multiple points of evidence suggesting the disease was partially due to an infectious stealth bacterium that had also been developed through bioweapons programs.  However as this is a complex subject, for the sake of simplicity, I focused on squalene adjuvants as being the primary cause and will discuss the stealth pathogens in a future article.

The HPV Vaccine:

Like the COVID-19 vaccines, there were many issues with Merck’s HPV vaccine Gardasil that should have led to it never being approved or at least pulled from the market years ago.  The vaccine provides no benefit and is linked to numerous severe harms. 

Peter Gøtzsche for example, typically supportive of vaccination, realized how problematic the HPV vaccine was and broke with his colleagues to speak out against it.  Shortly before this happened, the Gates Foundation bought out the Cochrane Collaboration (widely regarded as the most unbiased evaluators of medical evidence in the world).  Gøtzsche was then expelled from the Collaboration he cofounded for speaking out against this vaccine. 

This shook the evidence-based medicine community and many of the most ethical people in the field spoke out against it.  Since that time, the Cochrane Collaboration has stopped producing honest papers (for example, as covered in The Real Anthony Fauci, Cochrane’s new leadership knowingly published a very bad review that was used to tank Ivermectin and hence killed many people).

The HPV vaccine was specifically targeted to girls of child-bearing age (since the goal was to get the vaccine before their first HPV exposure from sexual activity, the first dose is scheduled for 11-year olds, although it is sometimes given earlier).  These girls were the most likely members of society to become pregnant and in a normal world, the vaccine’s effects on fertility should have been a key focus for any drug regulator 

In this section (primarily sourced from Chapter 10 of the book HPV Vaccine on Trial), we will look at the potential effects on fertility that were actually addressed by those responsible for evaluating them.  In 2020 it was estimated 77.1% of girls between 13 and 17 years of age had received this vaccine, while in England roughly 90% of girls had received the vaccine.  The numbers here matter, so try to keep them in mind before we move to the graphs.

In the clinical trials, the miscarriage rate for recipients of the Gardasil was 25%, and 27.4% for the later Gardasil 9.  This compares with a typical miscarriage rate of 8% to 15% with miscarriage rates increasing by age (so 10% is a safe estimate). Despite the catastrophic implications of these findings, in the same way the COVID-19 vaccination was given a free pass, the FDA chose not to find this miscarriage data concerning.  The FDA’s “reasoning” was that the 25% miscarriage rate was also observed in the placebo group, which arose because the “placebo” was Gardasil’s adjuvant, the primary toxic component of the vaccine.  In the clinical trials for the competing HPV vaccine Cervarix, which used a less dangerous adjuvant, an 8.3% miscarriage rate was observed in controls, while a 13.5% was observed in the vaccine arm, which should have informed the FDA that Gardasil quadrupled the miscarriage rate. 

This rate was even higher when the vaccine was received within 30 days of conception.  In the case of Gardasil 9, an overall miscarriage rate of 28.4% occurred compared to the 12.7% rate observed in the placebo group.  Of those receiving this vaccine, the rate was 40% in the 23-26 age range, and 18.9% in those aged 16 to 22.  Once again, the FDA completely ignored this safety signal, while the Europe’s FDA equivalent (the EMA) simply asked for an explanation and then signed off on it.

During the first Gardasil vaccine approval process, the FDA also noticed a large increase in birth defects (5 compared to 0 in the “placebo”) when Gardasil was given within 30 days of conception.  Like before, the FDA ultimately decided to drop the issue (it was not even mentioned on the package insert which simply stated there was no data on Gardasil’s effects on pregnant women).

Pfizer’s COVID vaccine (and likely the other COVID vaccines whose documents were not leaked), skipped much of the necessary animal testing (with the testing that was conducted often very incomplete) before proceeding to human trials.  Gardasil similarly had only very partial animal studies, and its effects on fertility were only tested during those animal studies.  Key toxicology studies were not conducted on the reproductive systems of female rats, there was no long-term observation of rat fertility, and the male rats were quickly disposed of after receiving the vaccines. 

Prior to Gardasil, unexplained premature ovarian failure (POF) was very rare (2 cases were identified by researchers from 1998 to 2008, while 13 were found from 2008 to 2013 following Gardasil’s initial entry to the market).  In 2013 the American Journal of Reproductive Immunology presented 3 cases of autoimmunity and POF following HPV vaccine administration. In 2014, Dr. Deidre Little published three case of healthy teenagers developing POF following vaccination.

VAERS (which typically captures less than 1% of the adverse events that occur) tells a similar story.  Currently on VAERS (which has been in operation since 1990), 25 cases of POF have been reported, 21 from the HPV vaccine and 4 from the COVID vaccine, while 75 cases of premature menopause (a related condition) have been reported, of which 54 came from an HPV vaccine and 16 from a COVID vaccine.  Polysorbate 80 is associated with autoimmune damage to the ovaries and has direct ovarian toxicity.  Since it is found in Gardasil (as well as the COVID-19 vaccines), it was suggested as a possible cause of POF; however, because it is also in other vaccinations, I do not think this link is specific enough.

Given all of this, what would you expect to occur once Gardasil was given to our next generation?

The Porcine Zona Pellucida Vaccine:

To conclude this article, we will review the Porcine zona pellucida (PZP) vaccine with the disclaimer that this the most speculative section of this article.  A key point I’ve tried to illustrate in this series is that the population control methods we see adopted for civilians significantly overlap with those used in wildlife management.  This could either be a product of those methods being first developed on animals, or because the predatory ruling class sees us as their animals. 

A key reason why I support animal rights and oppose inhumane animal experimentation is because if allowed there, those abuses eventually happen to humans.  As an example, the Biotech company Oxitec has spent years developing male mosquitos that sterilize female mosquitos when they mate, hence providing an extremely effective means of mosquito population reduction.  A wide coalition of scientists and activists have opposed this plan due to numerous irreversible problems it has the potential to create.  Nonetheless these mosquitos have been deployed and recently the EPA approved their release in Florida and California.  As far as I know from studying the subject, for humans, the closest we’ve come to an agent that can sterilize the recipient’s sexual partner were the anthrax vaccines.  You have to honestly ask yourself if this is the type of research you want done.   

Like the hCG vaccines, the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines have a very unusual dosing schedule.  This schedule does match one vaccine, the PZP vaccine (which also utilizes one of the more toxic oil adjuvants discussed in Vaccine A), and like the mRNA vaccines must be frozen (although it does not require as low of temperatures).  The PZP vaccine is designed to create antibodies to the sperm receptor found in the eggs of all mammals, thereby making fertilization impossible.  It is used for controlling wild populations of mammals such as horses. 

While the PZP vaccine is claimed to just safely block sperm fusing with an egg, there is some controversy around the vaccine, since evidence suggests that PZP antibodies actually work by inducing ovarian dystrophy, oophoritis (inflammation of the ovaries), destruction of oocytes in all growing follicles, and depletion of resting follicles.  While difficult to calculate precisely, like hCG vaccines, the PZP vaccine appears to cause progressively longer periods of sterility with each booster administered (8 years of sterility after 3 doses was one estimate).

Like the COVID vaccines, PZP can also cause significant menstrual irregularities.  PZP antibodies are also transferred through breast milk (it’s a bit of stretch to connect this, but there have been VAERS reports of infants who were severely injured or died following drinking their vaccinated mothers’ breast milk).  Finally there is an association between PZP vaccines and stillbirths, which has also been reported with the COVID-19 vaccines.

A major challenge for the PZP vaccine was ensuring a lengthy period of sterility, as it was not practical to repeatedly vaccinate wild animals.  Multiple groups have examined this question and the relatively new biotech company, SpayVac was able to solve this issue with Lipid Nanoparticles.

These particles are designed to hold onto the antigen so they create a prolonged sustained immune response in the tissue, which may be part of the reason why vaccine spike proteins are more destructive than those from a COVID-19 infection.  I also read speculation that the lipid nanoparticle used by SpayVac (IMV’s DPX) was designed to travel to ovaries where it finally releases its contents (IMV is also developing a DPX-based COVID vaccine).  Despite my best efforts, I was unable to located the patents or drug studies on these lipid nanoparticles, so as far as I know there, is no evidence to support that speculation.  That said, I don’t know if it matters because Pfizer’s lipid nanoparticle clearly travels to the ovaries.  This is quite problematic if they behave in a similar manner to DPX’s lipid nanoparticle, something specifically designed is designed to create a prolonged immune response in that region.

It was also noted that Pfizer’s CEO Albert Bourla is a veterinarian and likely worked with the PZP vaccine.  When I dug into this, I found out something possibly even more disturbing.  When male pigs are farmed, if you do not castrate them, 20% of males will develop meat that some people dislike the taste of (known as “boar taint”). 

Pfizer developed the vaccine Improvac, which creates autoimmunity to GnRH,  thereby significantly dropping the production of hormones in the body.  This chemically castrates the pigs and gives a cheap and easy way to prevent boar taint.  Some of the most toxic drugs on the market such as Lupron, that are typically used for more severe women’s health issues or to block puberty in transgender children, function interfering with the GnRH receptor, albeit in a more temporary fashion than Improvac.

In the following obscure 3 minute video (it had 2,000 views when I found it you might want to save a copy in case it disappears!), Bourla, already in an executive position eagerly presents Improvac to the European market. 

From seeing this, I am relatively certain he knew about the PZP vaccine and likely was aware of the value of using a similar approach to manage fertility in human males.  On December 28, 2020, he also signed a $4.2 billion deal for the rights to Relugolix, a new human GnRH receptor blocker.

(For author’s conclusions and pieces I didn’t include, please see link below.)

Vaccines Have Been Repeatedly Developed for Forced Sterilization Campaigns.

Transcript of the documentary video above:

JUNE 09, 2022

Movie Transcript – English

– Humans across the globe are becoming increasingly less fertile. The worldwide fertility rate dropped by nearly 60%.

– The lowest number of recorded births in 30 years.

– [Reporter] Fertility rates have hit a record low.

– A baby bust.

– Why are the rates lower? What’s happening here?

– [Commenter] Your body’s designed to do something, when you are told that you can’t. If I ever had to say to my daughter that she won’t be able to have children, it would be devastating.

– [Commenter] Since women stopped being able to have babies, what’s left to hope for?

– When I heard about this story from east Africa about fertility, my thought to myself, “That’s me.”

– As a gynecologist, in the last few years, we have seen a dramatic increase in the number of women who are losing pregnancies, the number of women who are presenting with threat of abortion, with bleeding in early pregnancy. We are also seeing a lot of young couples with infertility.

– Infertility is one of the most major problems now in gynecology in Africa.

– I have seen the tears. They have lost their identity. You die inside.

– The ultimate mystery, why are women infertile?

– My journey with the miscarriages was very difficult. The first one, I carried that pregnancy for about three weeks. I got pregnant again, and I must have carried that pregnancy for about four weeks. I got pregnant a third time, and this time, I carried that pregnancy for 10 weeks. I knew there was a problem.

– When a woman is pregnant, her baby produces HCG through the placenta

– [Narrator] Human chorionic gonadotropin, HCG, what is that?

– It’s a first signal that tells the woman she’s pregnant. It tells the ovaries to produce a second hormone called progesterone that then maintains the pregnancy.

– I was tested, and my anti-HCG levels were way up.

– [Narrator] What does this mean when a woman has antibodies, an immune reaction to HCG produced in her own body?

– If you create antibodies against HCG, the minute the new baby forming in the woman’s womb starts producing HCG, it is destroyed like it was bacteria or viruses, so that the signal is completely lost, and therefore, the ovaries do not produce progesterone. So if you have high enough levels of anti HCG antibodies, then the woman would actually just become sterile.

– [Narrator] But how does a woman develop antibodies to HCG, effectively, an autoimmune disease where the body is attacking itself? This was the question that was asked and answered by vaccine developers seeking to create an antifertility vaccine on behalf of the World Health Organization, starting in the early 1970s. This research and development program was undertaken in response to perceived overpopulation.

– From ’72 to ’92, they spent 20 years funding the research for development of that vaccine.

– [Narrator] These facts are indisputable. WHO, through its task force on vaccines for fertility regulation has been supporting research on a synthetic vaccine against the HCG molecule. In order to immunize a woman against getting pregnant or abort a successful pregnancy, scientists discovered that physically combining the beta subunit of HCG with the tetanus toxoid used in the routine tetanus vaccine was the most effective approach.

– Not only did the woman develop antibodies against tetanus, she also produced antibodies against HCG, including that produced by her own body. But inevitably, an antifertility program faced challenges. Despite support from Kenya’s leaders, and what were described as elite groups, the response of Kenyan women was unenthusiastic. In particular, women’s groups were concerned about the potential for abuse. Why?

– Because it had already happened. Women in the vaccine trials had already been sterilized without their knowledge or consent. Women were also worried that an antifertility vaccine campaign could be disguised as a tetanus vaccine program. Notably, the Catholic Women’s League of the Philippines had won a court order halting a UNICEF antifertility program specifically using tetanus vaccine laced with HCG.

– By the time of the order, 3 million women had already been vaccinated, but by 1995, for those in favor of fertility control in Kenya, the time for action was long overdue.

– World Health Organization brought in a tetanus campaign, and they said they wanted to eradicate neonatal tetanus.

– [Narrator] According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, neonatal tetanus is a form of tetanus infection that occurs in newborn infants. Neonatal tetanus occurs in infants born without protective passive immunity because the mother herself is not immune. It usually occurs through infection of the unhealed umbilical stump, particularly when the umbilical cord is cut with an unsterile instrument.

– We were already giving tetanus injections to all the pregnant women who WEre attending antenatal clinic to prevent neonatal tetanus. That was already part of the program in the country.

– But here, World Health Organization comes and says, “No, no no, we also want to give them outside pregnancy.” And the question is why?

– [Narrator] At a conference in Houston, Texas in 1995, Dr. Karanja had learned of antifertility campaigns in other countries under the guise of tetanus vaccination programs. That same year, the WHO planned a tetanus vaccine campaign in Kenyan women of childbearing age. Dr. Karanja prevailed upon the leaders of the Catholic church, a very large healthcare provider, to demand that the campaign vaccines be tested for HCG.

On this occasion, the government shared their concerns. Without explanation, the WHO apparently abandoned their campaign. 19 years later, however, the WHO was back, this time with the Kenyan government’s blessing. A neonatal tetanus program was started in October of that year.

– Currently, we have a tetanus campaign being carried out in Baringo County. We are targeting girls from the ages of 15 to women of the ages of 49, basically, the childbearing age.

– [Narrator] And then, there was the question of the vaccine schedule.

– They can produce sterility with the birth control vaccine, but they need to give multiple shots. Takes about five to really be effective, and they’re spaced about six months apart. Now, it’s interesting that tetanus vaccines can be spaced five years, or maybe 10 years. You don’t need a shot every six months, and you certainly don’t need five of them.

– The original plan was to give five doses, spread over six months each.

– [Narrator] This was the antifertility vaccine schedule. At this point, the Catholic Church decided to take the testing of vaccines for HCG into its own hands.

– [Spokesperson] The vaccines we are testing were collected from the field during the time of the March 2014 campaign.

– [Spokesperson] We got them from some of the nurses who were vaccinating.

– [Narrator] In Nairobi, three independent accredited laboratories tested samples from vials of the WHO tetanus vaccine being used in March 2014, and found HCG where none should be present. In October 2014, six additional vials were obtained by Catholic doctors, and were tested in six accredited laboratories. HCG was found in half the samples.

– All the tests showed that the vaccine used in Kenya in March and October 2014.

– Was laced with serum bHCG.

– [Reporter] Beta HCG.

– The human chorionic gonadotropin.

– [Reporter] The bishops are now vowing not to allow the exercise to take place.

– [Reporter] Calling for the immediate suspension of the vaccine.

– We are calling our people not to participate, and not to allow themselves be influenced by what is happening without clear information.

– [Narrator] The story made headlines around the world. In an effort to limit the fallout, the government stepped in.

– It was then agreed that there will be a joint committee of experts to test the vaccines, so there was three people from the government, and three people appointed by the Catholic bishops. We agreed we are going to test the nine vaccines that we had already tested. We also agreed to go and take some samples from the regular tetanus vaccine store of the government.

– [Narrator] A joint testing protocol was agreed upon, using another more specific detection method, high performance liquid chromatography, HPLC. AgriQ Quest, an independent accredited testing facility was contracted by Dr. Nicholas Muraguri, the government’s director of medical services to undertake analysis of vaccines.

– Muraguri urged AgriQ Quest to test samples provided by him rather than the previously tested samples obtained from the campaign. AgriQ Quest chose to analyze both sets of samples. Frederick Muthuri is the director of AgriQ Quest’s Nairobi facility.

– The committee of experts now give us a letter appointing us now as the testing laboratory for this vaccines. We actually found that some of the vaccines were contaminated with beta HCG.

– Vials that were positive for HCG using the ELISA method were still positive for HCG, using high performance liquid chromatography, the HPLC test.

– [Narrator] In two sets of analyses, AgriQ Quest found HCG in the same vaccine vials that tested positive earlier. However, AgriQ Quest found no HCG in 52 samples not from the campaign, but from government stores, many with the same batch numbers as the vials that tested positive for HCG. Bizarrely, Nicholas Muraguri, on behalf of the government, wrote to a AgriQ Quest demanding that they-

– [Reporter] Alter the results to reflect that the vaccines were safe to be administered.

– [Narrator] AgriQ Quest refused. The government went on the attack.

– World Health Organization was extremely angry, and you do not, you do not, repeat, you do not confront World Health Organization in Africa.

– [Reporter] The World Health Organization is encouraging mothers to continue taking the tetanus vaccine, which it says is safe.

– The vaccine is indeed safe.

– Safe.

– You’re saying that this is 100% safe?

– Absolutely safe.

– [Spokesperson] Safe, and free of beta HCG.

– [Reporter] The altercation has forced WHO and UNICEF to respond, accusing the Catholic church of peddling misinformation.

– This evidence has been shown to have been dismissed.

– It is safe, and it does not adversely impact the reproductive capacity of the girls and women of this country.

– [Reporter] The government side is quick to point out that only samples provided by the church were found to have been contaminated, yet they had the same batch numbers as those that tested negative.

– Does that mean that the Catholic Church is lying?

– One vial is open? Don’t know who it was who opened it. It is not important. Same family, closed vials was negative, so I leave it to you to interpret what that means.

– [Reporter] Their credibility cannot be confirmed.

– [Narrator] The government publicly denounced the Catholic Church’s concerns as baseless pronouncements-

– [Reporter] Not backed by any scientific evidence.

– [Narrator] For Doctors Karanja and Ngare, the backlash had just begun.

– We got letters from the medical board calling us for disciplinary action, and this is the board that registers doctors, so if they took away my license, then I wouldn’t be able to practice as a doctor in this country.

– A gag order was established against my person. I am not from 2014 expected to talk about vaccines in this country, because I am a danger. They say, and I don’t know why they say that, that I am an influential person, and that when I talk against vaccines, that people will listen to me.

– [Narrator] That brings this African story to its closing remarks. How baseless are the facts? What, if any, is the scientific evidence? There was an explicit intent through a three-decade-long program of research and development by the WHO to develop an antifertility vaccine, the motive, to reduce female fertility in the face of alleged overpopulation.

– The WHO’s research and development program had identified a conjugate, a chemically bonded form of beta HCG and tetanus vaccine as the most effective formulation, and for a five-dose schedule at six-monthly intervals as being necessary to prevent successful pregnancy. The resulting antifertility vaccine was successfully trialed in developing countries.

– According to the WHO, up to 63 countries may have been targeted. The antifertility vaccine schedule was the one planned for use in Kenya’s so-called neonatal tetanus vaccine campaign. Vaccine samples from the actual campaign were obtained and tested. The presence of HCG was confirmed using different tests in multiple laboratories.

– One of these laboratories, AgriQ Quest was contracted by the government’s Dr. Muraguri to analyze vaccine samples for beta HCG. AgriQ Quest confirmed that the samples that tested positive for beta HCG in other labs did so in their hands. Upon learning of these results, Dr. Muraguri demanded in writing that AgriQ Quest alter their report, refusing to pay for the testing when AgriQ Quest would not do so. However, tetanus vaccine samples provided from government stores, not from the field campaign, were negative. At this point, the government went on the offensive, declaring the vaccines-

– [Spokesperson] Safe and free of beta HCG.

– [Narrator] To cover the anomaly of the positive tests, government officials and others appear to have encouraged speculation in the media that the positive campaign samples were tainted and had been tampered with. Here, we come to the key forensic evidence. The director of AgriQ Quest confirmed that the HCG tetanus toxoid conjugate that he had detected, the chemically bonded form, the same one that the WHO had been developing and testing for many years could only have been introduced in the manufacturing process, and not through later contamination with beta HCG.

– This is not something that you can actually take and put in a vial, and test, and find it. This hormone was actually riding on something else, so there was actually a hump and a peak, so it actually rides on something else, which was, is actually chemically linked or bonded.

– The HPLC test showed that this HCG was conjugated. It was connected to the tetanus toxoid.

– At the time of production, it is made that way. They did not expect that these samples would actually be tested, and whatever was claimed to actually be confirmed.

– [Narrator] Despite that, Dr. Muraguri did go on national television to claim-

– I think it’s full of contradiction, because they have not submitted any reports.

– This is a report from AgriQ Quest laboratory analysis report, the Joint Committee of Experts on Tetanus Toxoid Vaccine Testing. This is a report from Nairobi Hospital. This is a report from the University of Nairobi College of Health Sciences. This is a report from Lancet Kenya.

– [Narrator] Dr. Muraguri himself appeared to have forgotten that he had the report.

– Even the report given to Karanja, which I’m holding here.

– [Narrator] And furthermore-

– The lab that they purported to have tested the vaccine has actually confirmed to me that no such thing ever happened.

– [Interviewer] No laboratory ever tested the vaccine and found HCG?

– That is not correct.

– [Narrator] Dr. Muraguri’s claims were false.

– So it just means that somebody actually had something big to hide.

– [Narrator] Which leads us to a disturbing turn of events. Despite alleged threats, harassment, and break-ins at his laboratory, on October 8th, 2020, AgriQ Quest director invited our cameras back. We were shown that the government samples of the tetanus vaccine bearing the same batch number as the campaign samples had been falsely relabeled.

– [Spokesperson] It had been put another label.

– [Interviewer] Just the bottom part?

– [Spokesperson] No, it was all over.

– [Interviewer] And then the whole thing fell off?

– [Spokesperson] Yes, it fell off, and the label showed Serum Institute, but the label below showed another different company.

– [Narrator] Underneath the false label was not only a different batch number, but a completely different manufacturer. Despite the health secretary stating publicly that for Kenya-

– The source is just one.

– [Narrator] This is also false. It appears that there were at least two suppliers of the tetanus vaccine to Kenya, the Serum Institute of India, and Biological E. Limited, and that the contents of their vaccine vials were different.

– It’s really sad when you see pharmaceutical industry, and people interested in profit, and maybe other things like population control, actually injuring people on purpose to achieve their ends.

– To imagine that a system somewhere, some people somewhere are behind my inability to carry pregnancy to term? That is a diabolical agenda.

– And woe to them, because as long as I’m here, alive in this world, they bring any vaccines here, I will hunt it down, analyze it, and tell the Kenyan people what it is.

– [Narrator] In a story that is reminiscent of John LeCarré’s The Constant Gardener, on April 29th, 2021, Dr. Karanja was killed, officially by the SARS-CoV-2 virus. The late Dr. Karanja had a message for the rest of the world.

– [Dr. Karanja] When they’re through with Africa, they’re coming for you. Keep your children ready. They will come for them, and they’ll come for you.

– I’ve been concerned about Bill Gates for some time, and the first contact I had with his agenda was at a meeting that I went to, the American Society of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecologists. The guest of honor was Malcolm Potts, who was from Berkeley University of California. He was the head of the International Planned Parenthood Federation. He was an advisor to Bill Gates. He was in the know about what Bill Gates was doing.

– Now, picture this, we’re sitting at a breakout session, and he was boasting about the success of their program in Africa. They would have Depo-Provera parties every month, and they would bring all sorts of bobbles, and beads, and gifts to the young girls as young as 12 years of age, and that would be an opportunity for them to inject them with Depo-Provera, which ensured infertility in those young tribal women. It also ensured the end of their normal reproductive cycles for the time that they were on the Depo-Provera, and in the majority of cases, far beyond.

– So I’ve seen many, many cases where Depo-Provera has caused permanent infertility. It’s hard to believe that these African girls even knew what was happening to them, ’cause many of them hadn’t even had their reproductive cycles in place long enough to know what normal is. Of course, the unknowing young girls were not made aware of the fact that this would deprive them of their reproductive cycles, and likely their fertility for not just months, but years, and lead to premature osteoporosis, obesity, depression, and other severe consequences.

– You’re basically taking away that woman’s reproductive health. The work that they were doing in Africa was under the auspices of the Gates Foundation. In retrospect, it kind of concerned me then, and concerns me even more now as we see a lot of what has happened with the Gardasil vaccine, and potentially other newer vaccines.

– [Dr. Bridle] We’re injecting these vaccines into the shoulder muscle. The assumption, all up until now, that they don’t go anywhere other than the injection site. Is it a safe assumption? Absolutely not. The spike protein gets into the blood. It accumulates at quite high concentrations in the ovaries. The spike protein is a pathogenic protein. It is a toxin. It can cause damage in our body. We made a big mistake. We didn’t realize it until now. Will be rendering young people infertile?

– When you vaccinate a person, they may make antibodies that might lead to an attack on the placenta. I am not saying that you take these vaccines, it will cause infertility, but I will say that none of the manufacturers should give you any assurances whatsoever that it won’t, because they have not bothered to measure whether the similarity is enough to produce on any occasions any antibody at all that might bind your own hormone, and if it does, yeah, it could stop you getting pregnant, or prevent your placenta from functioning properly. That’s the concern.