Federal Aviation Administration knowingly put pilots’ and passengers’ lives at risk by quietly changing ‘acceptable’ parameters for pilots’ EKG readings post-vax
“The FAA has very quietly tacitly admitted that the EKGs of pilots are no longer normal. We should be concerned. Very concerned.”- Steve Kirsch
BS”D
Those who should have been sounding the alarm have quietly gone along with the crime.
It is unconscionable that the FAA not only permitted the covid shots for pilots (they’re supposed to be in charge of safety, and pilots were NOT supposed to be getting new, inadequately tested injections) but then afterwards silently changed the rules for the pilots’ medical screenings, so that their heart injuries from the “vaccine” would pass under the radar - putting them and their passengers at grave risk, should their hearts give out during a flight (G-d forbid.)
I’ve come across a few excellent pieces I’d like to share on this topic, which I believe should be of concern to just about everyone.
I’ll start with excerpts from the Epoch Times article by Janice Hisle, updated January 25 (link to entire article below.)
FAA Change to Heart-Test Limit Triggers Worries Over Pilot Health, Public Safety
Concerns and controversy are swirling around the decision by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to alter an electrocardiogram test limit for pilots.
A researcher for an aviation advocacy group, US Freedom Flyers (USFF), stumbled upon the EKG change in December, several weeks after the FAA enacted it.
Because the revision was made without a published explanation, USFF turned to a nationally known cardiologist and other experts to assess its importance.
They say the FAA’s change involving “the PR interval” is significant. The PR interval represents the time it takes for an electrical impulse to travel from one part of the heart to another. It is an indicator of heart health.
But “the new normal” PR interval that the FAA set for pilots is 50 percent longer than the previous limit; it deviates from a long-accepted limit in cardiology.
Critics fear that expanding the limit could endanger pilots’ health and passengers’ safety.
….Josh Yoder, a commercial airline pilot who heads the USFF advocacy group. “This is a ticking time bomb on a level like we’ve never seen,” he told The Epoch Times in an interview.
Yoder and others say the FAA should be held accountable for relaxing the EKG standard. They say the new standard increases the odds that a pilot’s heart condition would slip past, undetected and untreated, setting the stage for disaster.
Stephen Carbone, a former FAA safety inspector: “I can’t highlight enough how dangerous this is and how irresponsible,” he said. “It risks the lives of pilots; it risks the lives of passengers; and it risks the lives of anyone in a house, apartment building, school, car, beach, park, or museum under the aircraft’s path.”
100 Milliseconds Means a Lot
On an EKG reading, the PR interval indicates how well electrical impulses travel within the heart, “so the whole heart can contract at once,” cardiologist Dr. Thomas Levy, who serves as USFF’s medical adviser, told The Epoch Times.
Dr. Peter Chambers, a retired U.S. military Special Operations flight surgeon, agrees it was unwise for the FAA to change the PR interval limit.
“That removes the ‘safety zone’ that allows us to catch the problem early,” Chambers told The Epoch Times in an interview. “It’s like coming up on an intersection where the traffic light goes directly from green to red–and you’re in the center of the intersection, facing a semi that could hit you.”
There is much more to the Epoch Times’ very thorough article - see the entire piece here:
In the video below, Tucker Carlson interviews Army Flight Surgeon Lt. Colonel Dr. Theresa Long, about the FAA’s new, looser guidelines for pilots’ heart health. She confirms that it’s baffling - there’s no conceivable way that these lower standards will contribute to safety. Quite the opposite. The FAA seems to be loosening rules in order to allow more heart abnormalities in pilots.
Steve Kirsch wrote an excellent piece about this travesty on January 17. I’ve slightly shortened and edited his article here. The link to the original is below.
After the vaccine rolled out, the FAA secretly widened the EKG parameter range for pilots so they wouldn't be grounded. It looks like the vax gave at least 50M Americans heart damage.
Special thanks: I was tipped off about this story by Josh Yoder at US Freedom Flyers. Please consider making a donation on their website. Thanks!
On October 24, 2022, the FAA quietly, without any announcement at all, widened the EKG requirements necessary for pilots to be able to fly. They didn’t widen them by a little. They widened them by a lot. Beyond the normal range.
The PR (a measure of heart function) used to be in the range of .12 to .2.
It is now: .12 to .3 and potentially even higher.
This is extraordinary. They did it hoping nobody would notice. It worked for a while. Nobody caught it. But you can’t hide these things for long.
This is a tacit admission from the US government that the COVID vaccine has damaged the hearts of our pilots. Not just a few pilots. A lot of pilots and a lot of damage.
The cardiac harm of course is not limited to pilots.
My best guess right now is that over 50M Americans sustained some amount of heart damage from the shot.
The FAA’s new “acceptable” EKG parameters are a very wide range; they accommodate people who have cardiac injury. Cardiologist Thomas Levy is appalled at this change:
We discuss his article Myocarditis: Once Rare, Now Common.
Basically, the vaccines are causing heart injury in at least 2.8% of people who get the shot. So 7M Americans now have hearts damaged by the COVID vaccine. He admits the number could be over 100M. The fact that the FAA quietly changed the EKG parameters for pilots suggests that the vaccine is causing a huge number of pilots to fail their screening. This is a tacit admission of a huge problem.
Thomas can be contacted at https://www.peakenergy.com/.
Swiss study of 777 people post-vaccine
From Thomas’s article:
In a recent Swiss study yet to be published at the time of this writing, troponin levels were measured on 777 hospital employees who received a booster injection after having received two shots previously. On the third day after the booster, troponin levels above the upper limits of normal were seen in 2.8% of those subjects. By the next day, half of the elevated troponin levels had come back into the normal range. Longer-term follow-up data was not available.
This study raises more questions than it answers. What would the troponin levels have been at one day post-injection? Did the troponin levels still elevated at day four post-injection resolve completely? If so, how long did that take to occur? Rather than be concerned that some myocardial damage was done by the vaccine, which is openly acknowledged in the study, it is dismissed as being of no importance since half of the elevated troponins resolved 24 hours later.
And, as with all of the current papers downplaying the significance of any vaccine side effect, however significant, the authors always conclude that the vaccine is doing much more good than harm without any further qualification as to why such a conclusion is valid.
Why did they make the change?
Why would they do that?
I’ll take an educated guess as to why they did that. I believe it is because they knew if they kept the original range, too many pilots would have to be grounded. That would be extremely problematic; commercial aviation in the US would be severely disrupted.
And why did they do that quietly without notifying the public or the mainstream media?
I’m pretty sure they won’t tell me, so I’ll speculate: it’s because they didn’t want anyone to know.
In other words, the COVID vaccine has seriously injured a lot of pilots and the FAA knows it and said nothing because that would tip off the country that the vaccines are unsafe. And you aren’t allowed to do that.
Why we sure it was the vaccine that did it
There are several clues that are consistent with “it was the vaccine and not COVID”:
They were quiet about it. If it was COVID, you can be public. But the vaccine is supposed to be safe.
The timing. October 2022 is late for COVID. If it was due to COVID, it would have happened well before now. They can make changes every month.
The vaccine creates far more injury to the heart than COVID (which creates NO added risk per this large-scale Israeli study of 196,992 unvaccinated adults after Covid infection).
Anecdotally, cardiologists only started to notice the damage post-vaccine.
All the sudden deaths started post-vaccine.
The data supporting my 20% damage estimate
• I know from a study of 177 people in Puerto Rico (97% of whom were vaccinated) ages 8 to 84, that 70% of those people, when screened for cardiac injury using an FDA-approved testing device (from Heart Care Corp), exhibited objective signs of cardiac injury.
• There was a study done on pilots. It will be published in The Epoch Times later this week. That indicated heart damage in over 20% of pilots screened (The Epoch Times will release the exact number).
• The Thailand study showed nearly 30% of kids had abnormal cardiac biomarkers after the shot. (BW: see in-depth story about Thailand study below.)
Bottom line: The most logical conclusion is that the FAA knows the hearts of our nation’s pilots have been injured by the COVID vaccine that they were coerced into taking, the number of pilots affected is huge, the cardiac damage is extensive, and passenger safety is being compromised by the lowering of the standards to enable pilots to fly.
The right thing would be for the FAA to come clean and admit to the American public that the COVID vaccine has injured 20% or more of the pilots (based on their limited EKG screening), but I doubt that they will ever do that.
The change: from 200 msec to 300 msec and beyond
The changes were made on October 24, 2022 to the GUIDE FOR AVIATION MEDICAL EXAMINERS.
Here is the change log where you can see the change listed (see page 4):
Here is what the policy was before the change. It was just one row:
Here are what it looks like as of Oct 24, 2022 (click the image to see the context):
So it’s now two rows, one for less than 300 ms (it used to be 200 ms), and a second row to handle 300 ms or more.
For more information about the change, see Myocarditis: Once Rare, Now Common.
The Thailand study
In the US, we are not allowed to do lab tests on people before and after the vaccine.
The reason for that is simple: it would make it crystal clear that the vaccines are unsafe. That is why there are no before/after studies in the US. There never will be.
Why? Because that is how science works in America today: it’s unethical to design a study that might expose that the COVID vaccines that they forced us to take cause harm.
Think I’m kidding about how they game the trials? Get yourself a copy of Turtles All the Way Down and just read the first chapter. It’s eye opening.
Even though we can’t do a before/after study in the US, they did such a study in Thailand on 301 kids. They found that 29.24% of the participants developed cardiac injuries within days after they got the second shot:
But here’s the most important part about that study that nobody points out:
None of the tests that were done in the Thailand study included doing a cardiac MRI with contrast on all the participants since that would be expensive and invasive. That test is the gold-standard for cardiac injury.
In other words, the 29% rate of injury was a lower bound of injury.
If you did a cardiac MRI on all those kids, you are going to find stuff that you will not find using the cheap and easy tests. Maybe a lot of stuff.
Summary
I believe that the actual rate of heart injury from these vaccines will be found to be well over the 29.7% rate of heart damage in the Thailand study.
At a more conservative 20% injury rate, we are looking at 50M Americans with heart damage caused by the jab.
As more studies are done, it’s going to be crystal clear why so many people are dying suddenly, especially kids. It’s also going to explain why nursing homes have lost up to 33% of their residents in 12 months where before they were losing only 1 or 2% a year. It’s going to explain why I was unable to find even a single nursing home where the all-cause mortality dropped after the vaccines rolled out. And it’s going to explain why none of the nursing homes wanted to talk to me about what happened to people after the shots rolled out.
Confidence in the CDC and the medical community should hit rock bottom after it is revealed how extensive the damage caused by these vaccines is.
Steve updated his article with a note that a pilot sent him:
Steve, I am a 66 yr old commercial aviator with no previous heart problems. On Jan 6, my first class medical was deferred, due to 2nd AV block, Mobitz type 2 (see picture of EKG with diagnosis). I am asymptomatic.
I received both Moderna injections (March&April 2021). No booster.
I am an ex endurance athlete (road bike racer) and do not and have not taken any routine medication.
I’m awaiting an appointment with Cardiologist next week.
Coincidentally, my wife suffered a severe heart attack in May 2021, 8 days after her first Moderna injection. She had no previous history of heart problems.
Here’s the link to Steve’s original article:
Steve has followed up by contacting the FAA to ask them to look into the pilots who’ve been injured. Of course, he didn’t get anywhere. It just isn’t happening.
The FAA is not investigating any pilot injury, disability, or deaths if it is associated with the COVID vaccines. They know about the incidents, but there is no investigation. When contacted, they have no comment as to why there are not investigating these incidents. The official story is “we haven’t seen a problem” but they haven’t seen a problem because they refuse to look.
The corruption is at the highest levels, e.g., Federal Air Surgeon Susan Northrup and FAA Deputy Administrator Bradley Mims. I’ve spoken to both of them directly. They are doing nothing to fix any of the problems I’ve identified and aren’t interested in talking to the injured pilots.
Dr. Paul Elias Alexander wrote about the very concerning change in FAA’s EKG allowable parameters as well. Here is a quote from his article:
Why would the FAA have to change a typical test and set a new test limit when it is known that a PR interval longer than 200 ms “is clearly associated with arrhythmias in the future, pacemakers, and early death”? Are pilots failing this test of the normal cardiac electrical conduction 200 ms interval? What does the FAA know about pilots who have been vaccinated for this has followed mass mandated vaccines of airline pilots. What is it? Is there data the FAA and airlines now have that could inform us of how many pilots failed this 200 ms threshold since COVID injection? ‘A PR interval longer than 200 ms “might be innocuous, but you can’t assume it to be innocuous,” particularly “in the setting of the pandemic.”’
Here is the link: