HPV VACCINE HORRORS: Murder and disability by Gardasil, LAWSUIT HAPPENING, and letter from prominent Rabbis saying “Don’t get the shot!”
I was shocked when I discovered what’s happening. And this shot does NOT even prevent cancer as claimed.
After hearing terrible stories of multiple ongoing tragedies that resulted directly from the Gardasil vaccine in the town of Lakewood, New Jersey, where I have many friends, I feel I must raise particular awareness of the grave dangers of this shot.
There are teenagers in the community in Lakewood, whom a friend of mine knows personally, who are, right now, lying in bed, paralyzed and completely disabled, because of this poison HPV shot given to them by their doctor.
Other young women have gone into menopause, and don’t even have any follicles left, as a result of Gardasil. (See lawsuit below.)
G-d have mercy!! Why???
For what purpose were these children given poison?
The stated purpose of Gardasil is to prevent an STD which could possibly result in cervical cancer when the children are much older.
But there is no true evidence that the vaccine actually works to prevent cancer. It is a sham, and simply causes death and misery.
Now, a lawsuit is ongoing against the vaccine manufacturer, Merck. The law firm is Miller and Zois. They state that they are reviewing Gardasil vaccine lawsuits in all 50 states.
(All for a vaccine that the lying CDC claims there were so few verifiable adverse reports for that they couldn’t establish a correlation!)
Here is Miller and Zois’s February 1 lawsuit update, which I found very interesting:
February 1, 2023: Last week, Merck filed a denial and list of affirmative defenses, which offers a detailed outline of its apparent strategy for defending the Gardasil lawsuits. Merck will argue that the Gardasil claims based on failure to warn are precluded under the National Childhood Vaccine Act of 1986 (42 U.S.C. § 300aa-22). Merck also intends to contest the allegations that Gardasil was “defective” in its design and assert the learned intermediary defense, which puts the obligation to warn about the risks of Gardasil on doctors. Gardasil lawyers are optimistic these defenses can be defeated.
Here is a study:
Here is a (slightly shortened) heartbreaking testimonial from 2019:
My HPV Gardisil Vaccine Injury Story
By Brianne Neal
Now as for my injuries from this vaccination, the story is very clear, black and white- I was healthy and fine for a lifetime, up to the age of 26 years old and nearing the end of my BSN nursing degree when I received the first of the 3 shots in the Gardisil-7 series- and then I was not.
I consented to the Gardisil vaccine as the fiance of a service member, it was a vaccination recommended by the military to all spouses and significant others, and I wanted to do everything "right" and belong, and be the perfect "Army Wife". I didn't realize most all of the spouses had declined this vaccination.
I was given no information about the excipients or ingredients of this vaccine, nor of the risks and potential adverse events when I went to my doctor to receive it. I asked specifically what it was for- I was told to prevent cervical cancer- and if i had any reason to be concerned or forgo the shot, and I was of course told, "Absolutely not, we give them all the time to much younger girls".
My symptoms of extreme fatigue and frequent severe headaches were essentially immediate. I moved from Texas to Washington state with my husband shortly after the first Gardisil shot, and at first I wrote off my symptoms as part of the move, change, and even the Washington state weather. But they got worse. I began having chills every evening for no reason and I was often dizzy and wanting to remain seated as much as possible to keep the lightheaded sensation at bay. I scarcely had an appetite and had to force myself to eat, but I had begun to gain weight. My general disposition had become the feelings of "tired" and "unwell", and I had to drop out of my transfer program to finish my degree.
The appropriate months had passed and it was time to receive the second Gardisil shot in the 7 series. I will never forget that crisp Washington day, and the fateful events that transpired. I went to Planned Parenthood for my second shot in the series as I was in between health insurances for a brief period and it was offered there at a reasonable price. I remember the PA in the clinic there pulling the vial from the box, and upon it was a large sticker outlined with a thick red line. "What's that about?" I asked her. She replied that she had to inform me that this shot is known to be a painful delivery, and it is recommended to be administered to sitting patients as opposed to those standing. I remember my hesitancy and uneasiness about it, but again, wanting to meet the expectations of me, and also having already received the first shot and being told I had to receive all 3 in the series to achieve efficacy, I submitted, and I took the devastating blow that was the second shot in the Gardisil-7 series.
The arm I received the shot in was immediately in excruciating pain, all the way down my arm and in to my fingertips. Quietly tears rolled from my eyes. "This didn't feel right," I sat there frightened thinking to myself. It was as if Mohamed Ali in the prime of his career had just socked my bicep with a full-force haymaker, and I was absolutely stunned.
My sickness following that second shot was fierce, and immediate. My fatigue turned almost narcoleptic, and my joints and muscles ached unbearably, constantly. My headaches became excruciating and even more frequent. I quickly developed POTS (Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome) and frequently full-on fainted upon standing. I began having full-body seizures, regularly. My brain became foggy and scattered, and not only would I confuse words I had known my whole life, and get lost 2 blocks from my house- it literally hurt my head to try to think. I lost 70 lbs, had a cardiac arrest, and my heart developed severe arrythmia. My hands trembled uncontrolably.
As my seizure frequency increased, I became a frequent flier at the local general hospital and they were at a loss as to what was the cause of my ailments. My husband told me a couple years ago that the paramedics that would come to the house when I was unconscious after seizures were often the same individuals, and that they had related to him that during that time there were two other girls within the same ambulance coverage area that like me, suffered these severe, yet idiopathic symptoms. My neurological symptoms became even more severe. My speech was drastically affected, and what I could speak sounded like I had a foreign accent, or at other times like I was a deaf individual. I exhibited more than one aphasia. I lost all fine motor function in my hands and couldn't grip silverware or food to feed myself or hold any kind of writing instrument. My husband wrapped handtowels repeatedly around forks and spoons with multiple layers of duct tape for me to attempt to feed myself, and my food had to be cut into very small peices. I would stumble and trip on my own feet when I was stable enough to stand with assistance, which wasn't often. I even had periods of time where I didn't have control of my continence. As if all of the frightening things that were happening to me weren't enough, now I had to be stripped of the last of my dignity, knowing that I couldn't guarantee I wouldn't urinate or worse on myself was a crushing low for me. My disposition was so bad and my siezures so constant, I didn't even notice that I had had a TIA (Transient Ischemic Attack), also known as a "mini-stroke" during that time. It was found some months later on a MRI of my brain. My mother had to leave my father on the east coast and come stay and live with my husband and I for a year, because I was so disabled at that time.
By the time the MRI was ordered, my entire digestive system was in failure; I could neither eat food nor drink water- my body would violently expell the contents. My husband was stationed at First Special Forces Group in Washington at the time, and one of the combat medics on his team was offering to teach him to hang IV bags at our house for me, and how to administer the IV's themselves. Not being able to digest water is an extremely dire state of being and we were quickly running out of options and resources. I was at the hospital every day at that time but the doctors had no answers and would turn me away.
A fellow military spouse who had been aware of my serious ongoing illness directed us to a nurse practitioner who had been in practice in allopathic medicine for 45 years and who now facilitated holistic remedies alongside allopathic treatements. She directed me to a Naturopathic doctor, and in the meantime, brought improvement to my digestive woes by running some tests that determined my body wasn't producing any stomach acid, at all, and that was why my body was immediately emptying my stomach, because it knew I couldn't digest my stomach contents. Its amazing how much Betain Hydrochloride and Pepsin tablets made a tremendous difference in my digestion, as did apple cider vinegar. I was able to get a little food and a little fluid down, but I still had an entire mountain to climb as far as recovering from my severe neurological difficulties. The Naturopaths had seen my same presentation many many times, more and more frequently in the recent years. They ran a whole host of toxic substance and heavy metal panels, and my numbers were off the charts. I had essentially been poisoned, and many of these poisons had made it up in to my brain and neural tissue.
By the time everything was said and done with, my many diagnoses included- Hashimoto's Thyroiditis, Addison's Disease with 3 distinct Addisonian Crises, Fibromyalgia, Mitral Valve Prolapse, Rhematoid Arthritis- with a concentration in my left arm and left side of my cervical spine; the same bicep I recieved the second shot of the Gardisil 7 series, IBS, Degenerative Disc Disease, Cervical Polyps, and Cystic ovaries- to name a few. To this day, the intramuscular and nerve pain in my left arm where I received the second Gardisil shot remains. It never went away. My many specialists were never able to put a distinct lable on my neurological deficits.
In the years since, I have met many women with extremely similar medical sagas, women of different ages, from different places, of different ethnicities, and different socioeconomic backgrounds- the ONLY thing we all had in common was having received the Gardisil Vaccine.
Through many years of medically assisted detoxification, chelation, organic eating, sauna, hyperbaric chamber sessions, physical therapy, occupational therapy, psychological therapy, countless high quality doctor-recommended supplements, and appropriate allopathic medications, I have been able to regain what were my neurological deficits. My cluster headaches though now controlable, and other diagnoses still remain, each in varying degrees that shift depending on stress. I am unable to hold a conventional job. I am highly functioning for my diagnoses and have many decent and productive days, but still have days that I must take respite within the safe confines of my own home.
I got to a point where both allopathic and holistic doctors alike said I was healthy enough with medications and screened well during preconception examinations, and also had good vitamin stores, and I was given the go ahead to start trying to conceive. That was over 3 years ago. I am 34 years old with the ovarian reserve of a 19 year old, yet I have had multiple miscarriages including a second trimester missed miscarriage. While not completely unattainable, it appears that my journey to motherhood will be complicated and require therapies and assistance.
I WAS 26 YEARS OLD WHEN I RECEIVED THIS VACCINATION. I NEVER RECEIVED THE 3RD AND FINAL SHOT OF THE GARDISIL 7 SERIES. I CAN NOT EVEN IMAGINE WHAT THIS WOULD HAVE DONE TO A NOT COMPLETELY DEVELOPED ADOLESCENT BODY!!!
JAPAN HAS OUTLAWED THIS VACCINE AS SCORES OF YOUNG GIRLS WERE INJURED AND CRIPPLED UPON ITS INTRODUCTION TO THE COUNTRY.
ALLOPATHIC DOCTORS ARE NOT TRAINED IN THE SEVERE ADVERSE EVENTS THAT ARE ATTRIBUTED TO THIS VACCINATION. SPECIALISTS REPEATEDLY TOLD ME THEY DIDN'T KNOW HOW TO HELP ME.
IF I COULD DO IT ALL OVER AGAIN, I WOULD NEVER EVER EVER EVER SUBMIT TO THIS VACCINATION.
I HAD ALWAYS HAD A HEALTHY CERVIX AND PAP SMEARS AND NOW REGULARLY HAVE TO HAVE POLYPS REMOVED FROM MY CERVIX.
THIS VACCINE WAS NEVER TESTED FOR MUTAGENIC, CARCINOGENIC, OR FERTILITY DIMINISHING EFFECTS- OFFICIALLY. THE ANECDOTAL EVIDENCE HOWEVER IS OVERWHELMING THAT THIS VACCINE CAUSES ALL OF THESE NEGATIVE EFFECTS.
PLEASE PLEASE HEAR MY DESPERATE PLEAS!!! PLEASE DO NOT SUBJECT YOUR PRECIOUS CHILDREN TO THIS UNNECCESSARY VACCINE!!
Here is a tiny fraction of the information about this particularly dangerous, and especially ineffective and useless shot.
Robert F. Kennedy on Gardasil: https://www.bitchute.com/video/rrIM5BzU4WYX/
Gardasil injury/death testimonies:
Dr. Suzanne Humphries goes through the manufacturer's Gardasil package insert:
Copy of the package insert:
I have a question: Why is a shot ostensibly to prevent cervical cancer being given to BOYS?
The following article about the absolute HORRORS of the HPV (Gardasil) vaccine was written in September 2021. I will copy part of it here.
The article begins with a letter that was signed in the spring of 2021 by leading Rabbis in Lakewood, NJ, urging people to refrain from receiving the Gardasil vaccine.
The Lakewood letter … indicates that “the vaccine has tragically inflicted serious injury with life-altering consequences on many children in our community.”
This is in line with what thousands of women and girls (as well as boys) around the world have been stating regarding this vaccine. Several documentaries have been produced (see here, here, here and here) which describe these horrific and painful experiences as well as the subsequent neglect and ridicule that these victims of vaccine-induced damage (including paralysis, teenage menopause, and death) have endured in their effort to seek acknowledgement and compensation.
(It is hard to find accurate information about this when using Google, presumably since Google’s parent company Alphabet Inc. owns partnering firms together with pharmaceutical companies including GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Sanofi, and Pfizer and others.)
It should be noted that in the clinical trials of Gardasil, Merck had the girls who were in the control group (i.e., the ones who did not get the vaccine) subsequently vaccinated with the actual shot shortly after the trial ended.
This effectively prevented science from being able to see any long-term effects by comparing the group who got the vaccine with those who didn’t for long-term results. Why would Merck try to destroy this type of scientific evidence? Doesn’t science always look for long term results?
An identical pattern of scientific sabotage is taking place today wherein those who were in the control group for the COVID-19 shot were subsequently injected with the actual shot, preventing us from ever discovering long term adverse effects of this covid injection.
It should be further noted that Merck, the manufacturer of the Gardasil vaccine, is the same company who created Vioxx. According to drugwatch, “Vioxx was once a popular drug to treat arthritis. But manufacturer Merck & Co. pulled it from the market in 2004 amid safety concerns. Research linked the drug to thousands of fatal heart attacks.”
Even before the 2004 retraction of Vioxx, doctors around the world expressed grave concern over severe side effects and death which they were seeing in their patients who used Vioxx.
Instead of investigating the concerns and removing the product from the market, Merck decided to go on the offensive. According to The Australian, according to internal company emails release in Australian courts at the time, Merck had stated that they will attack any doctor who questions the safety of Vioxx, and that “We may need to seek them out and destroy them where they live.“, effectively creating a hit list of dissenting doctors.
The email, which was exposed in federal court in Melbourne as part of a class action against the drug company included the words “neutralise”, “neutralised” or “discredit” against some of the doctors’ names.
Merck is also the manufacturer of a MMR vaccine, used to prevent mumps, measles and rubella, and holds the exclusive licensing rights allowing them to sell this vaccine in the United States.
In 2010, several scientist at Merck blew the whistle on the fact that Merck had deliberately lied about the efficacy of the mumps portion of the MMR vaccine by falsifying data. Effectively, they claimed that the mumps vaccine didn’t really work, based on true data.
As a result of this discovery, the United States government itself filed charges against Merck. This suit is known as Unites States versus Merck. This suit has been ongoing for over ten years. About a year ago, the records of the case have been sealed.
This author speculates why there would be a need to conceal records in the event that Merck was truly innocent of said allegations. Wouldn’t they want the records not to be sealed, so that their record could be vindicated in the court of public opinion?
We were able to obtain copies of the original complaint filed by the government (see below).
Download as PDF (If this link doesn’t work, please go to the link to the original article above, yo get the PDF of the government’s lawsuit against Merck.)
Now, all the above documented the harms caused by the HPV vaccine - but does it at least work in its stated goal of preventing cervical cancer?
It seems clear that the HPV shot is a huge scam, like so many others, and the human suffering it causes serves no purpose other than to line the pockets of those who manufacture and dispense it.
I asked readers to help me out with information on this.
One subscriber, who is an MD PhD, sent me two emails, which I’m including here in shortened form. Any further documentation that other readers can send to me at firstname.lastname@example.org, or in the comments, would be very much appreciated.
Gardasil was a fraud from day 1. Since my classmate in the NYU MD-PhD program spent 6 years studying papilloma (wart virus), I could not help learning all about it. This virus has been well-known and intensely studied for a century now. It has always been suspected, by some, to cause cancer, but after a hundred years there’s still not a shred of credible evidence that it causes anything but warts.
When Gardasil first came out, it was alleged to “reduce cervical cancer by 75%” (number approximate, but it was a HUGE number). I immediately smelled a rat, but how could I tell my patients to refuse a “vaccine” that produced such dramatic cancer reductions? So I kept my mouth shut.
But they hype continued, and it became clear that they were going to be giving this to little school girls.
Eventually the stench of the fraud became too overpowering, and I took the time to look it up. The first thing I read was the package insert, which accurately stated that the “vaccine” is against papilloma virus, not against “cervical cancer”. The package insert made no preposterous claims about being a cancer cure, but stated that it was designed to prevent warts, which “may” undergo malignant transformation. Really? Then how come a hundred years of research has failed to document any such malignant transformation? What’s missing in this picture?
Next I looked up the history of this so-called “vaccine”. The 2 women who developed the Merck vaccine (I can’t bring their names to mind now), when they became aware of the lies Merck was employing to dupe people into thinking that this was a “cancer vaccine”, publicly denounced Merck’s marketing campaign. They thus are in the good company of Kary Mullis the Nobel laureate inventor of PCR, and Robert Malone, the inventor of the mRNA vaccine.
(We should also never forget how helpful Merck was in developing poison gas for Hitler’s gas chambers).
The doctor’s next email:
I did a bit of research to see what they’re alleging about HPV these days. To my horror, they’ve now concluded that HPV causes “most cases” of cervical cancer.
Do I believe this? Not a chance. If, after a century of research, no clear connection between HPV and cancer could be established, what has changed?
In the last 10-20 years a number of “studies” have been published, proclaiming that the majority of human cervical carcinomas “have HPV DNA in their cells”. Well, that wouldn’t necessarily prove anything, but the first question is “How was that determined?”
Most of the articles I tried to look up are only available for money, and I won’t pay (there are very few cases where I learned anything of value from an article that demanded to be paid to read). The studies that are visible merely reference previous studies which ask more questions than they answer. First of all, most of the statistics come from foreign countries, where “scientific research” often translates to “accepted a bribe from the government” (or from a pharmaceutical company). Secondly, what exactly is it that they are they calling “cancer”? This question is far from trivial.
For starters, the theory that the world-famous “Pap smear” can identify “cervical pre-cancer” has never been tested. I once asked a pathologist for a reference to a randomized, prospective study comparing the cancer mortality rate in women who take the pointless Pap smear, and women who refuse. His response was “That cannot be done – it’s not ethical”.
“Not ethical”? If the Pap smear’s efficacy at preventing cancer has never been tested, because such a test would not be “ethical”, how then did the Pap smear attain the virtually-mandatory status it has reached? (I think you know the answer to this question: mass marketing and med/pharm profiteering).
Next question: What are these lesions that they’re calling cervical “cancer”? Is there any evidence that they are really malignant? Or is this merely another “basal cell carcinoma” scam? (Basal cell carcinoma, a real cash cow for dermatologists, is totally non-malignant, but if they were to tell the truth, and stop calling it “carcinoma”, then the dermatology industry would lose tons of money).
Here is more - thank you to the reader who contributed!
See the whole paper: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0141076819899308
And now, an excellent article from CHD. I copied part in here, please click the link for the whole thing.
Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines hit the global marketplace in the mid-2000s. From the start, public health agencies enthusiastically promoted HPV vaccination as the “best way to protect [young people] against certain types of cancer later in life.” However, a blistering new study by British researchers—and new datashowing that cervical cancer rates are surging in British 25- to 29-year-olds—raise numerous questions about officials’ inflated claims. The study’s results indicate, instead, that the jury is still out on whether HPV vaccination is effective.
The question is far from academic because, prior to Britain’s introduction of HPV vaccination in 2008, cervical cancer rates had been trending sharply downward. In fact, between the late 1980s and mid-2000s, cervical cancer rates halved. Now, Britain’s leading cancer research charity (Cancer Research UK) reports a steep 54% rise in cervical cancer in one of the very age groups that first received the vaccine.
The trials’ questionable methodology generated “uncertainties” so significant that they undermine claims of efficacy.
The 2020 study, published in the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, critically appraisestwelve published randomized controlled trials that HPV vaccine makers GlaxoSmithKline and Merck used to buttress assertions about their vaccines’ efficacy (Cervarix and Gardasil). The British authors do not beat around the bush in presenting their conclusions, which include the following:
The trials’ questionable methodologygenerated “uncertainties” so significant that they undermine claims of efficacy.
The ages of the women who participated in the trials were not representative of the younger adolescents who constitute HPV vaccination’s primary target groups.
The studies used highly restrictive criteria to exclude many potential participants, limiting the trials’ “relevance and validity for real world settings.” (During Science Day presentations for the Jennifer Robi vs. Merck and Kaiser Permanente Gardasil lawsuit in January 2019, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. made the same point, describing the “elite club of superheroes” who constituted the study group and noting that Merck purged anyone with the slightest vulnerabilities to the vaccine or its ingredients despite the fact that the vaccine would ultimately be marketed to girls with the very vulnerabilities excluded during the clinical trials.)
The trials used “composite and distant surrogate outcomes” that essentially made it “impossible to determine effects on clinically significant outcomes.” The authors explain that the surrogate outcomes used (forms of cervical dysplasia called CIN1 and CIN2) often regress on their own “and are of limited clinical concern.” They also note that different forms of cervical dysplasia each have “their own different natural histories, prevalence and incidence and strength of association with cancer.” Lumping together vastly different forms of dysplasia into the trials’ composite surrogate endpoints, therefore, was “problematic.”
The trial investigators’ unusually frequent cervical screening of study participants likely resulted in overdiagnosis of low-grade cervical changes while overestimating the vaccines’ efficacy in preventing them. The Royal Society of Medicine authors also note that vaccine efficacy against low-grade cervical changes is no guarantee of efficacy against the higher-grade abnormalities that may contribute, along with other risk factors, to cervical cancer.
Most damningly, the authors argue that no certainty about whether HPV vaccination prevents cervical cancer is possible, because the trials “were not designed to detect this outcome, which takes decades to develop.”
… a cervical cancer “peak” at ages 25-29 represents a “big change” from the pattern that prevailed in Britain in previous decades—when cervical cancer peaked in women aged 50-64.
High vaccine uptake . . . and rising cancer rates
Now consider these uncertainties against the backdrop of the United Kingdom’s HPV vaccination program—launched with great fanfare in 2008 with the bivalent Cervarix vaccine (replaced by Gardasil in 2011). The UK’s program rapidly achieved a high national uptake—on the order of 76% to 90%—making it “one of the most successful globally.” Although the HPV vaccination program primarily targeted 12-year-olds, Britain also operated a “catch-up” program during the initial three-year period (2008-2011) that encouraged girls ages 13-18 to get vaccinated. By mid-2018, the UK government estimated that 80% of 15- to 24-year-old girls and women had received the vaccine.
Given that Britain’s HPV vaccine uptake was high from the get-go, many of the women now in their mid to late twenties who are experiencing the spiking cervical cancer rate must have been among the UK’s first HPV vaccine recipients. How does this uncomfortable fact square with Public Health England’s sunny endorsement of HPV vaccination and its confident prediction (in 2018) that it would be able to “get an accurate picture of the impact this vaccine will have on this devastating cancer” as soon as vaccinated girls reached ages 25-29?
Please see this link for the rest of the CHD article: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/bombshell-study-questioning-hpv-vaccine-efficacy-appears-as-the-uks-cervical-cancer-rates-rise-in-young/
Please share the expose of the HPV vaccine fraud widely!
G-d willing, hopefully we will help to save some children from this tragedy.