More about the WHO attempt to control the world (literally)
A treaty without Senate approval?!?
BS”D
Today, the Brownstone Institute published a very concerning article about the WHO meeting that is going on now:
U.S. Government Negotiates Deal to Give WHO Authority Over U.S. Pandemic Policies
The Biden administration is preparing to sign up the United States to a legally binding accord with the World Health Organisation (WHO) that would give it the lawful authority to dictate America’s policies during a pandemic.
Despite widespread criticism of the WHO’s response to the Covid pandemic, US Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Xavier Becerra joined with WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus in September 2022 to announce “the U.S.-WHO Strategic Dialogue”. Together, they developed a “platform to maximise the longstanding U.S. Government-WHO partnership, and to protect and promote the health of all people around the globe, including the American people.”
These discussions and others spawned the ‘zero draft‘ of a pandemic treaty, published on February 1st, which now seeks ratification by all 194 WHO member states. A meeting of the WHO’s Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB) is scheduled for February 27th to work out the final terms, which all members will then sign.
Written under the banner of “the world together equitably,” the zero draft grants the WHO the power to declare and manage a global pandemic emergency. Once a health emergency is declared, all signatories, including the United States, would submit to the authority of the WHO regarding treatments, government regulations such as lockdowns and vaccine mandates, global supply chains, and monitoring and surveillance of populations.
Click here for the rest of the article: https://brownstone.org/articles/us-government-negotiates-who-authority-over-pandemic-policies/
Investigative journalist Janet Phelan has just written a piece for my substack on this matter of critical concern to all of us.
A Treaty Without Senate Approval? What does this Herald for our Republic
By Janet Phelan
With all the alarming verbiage incorporated into the proposed amendments to the WHO International Health Regulations and into the proposed pandemic treaty, one glaring anomaly strikes the eye like a shard of glass.
Apparently, the current draft of the proposed pandemic treaty has a clause which decimates the normal progression of approval and ratification by a member state. In the US, treaty adoption requires a couple of steps. First, it must be signed by the President. Following this, it must be presented to the Senate for a ratification resolution.
The proposed pandemic treaty, known as the Zero draft, does an end run around these checks and balances. Here is from Article 35, which proposes a mechanism for “provisional acceptance” sans formal ratification.
1. The WHO CA+ may be applied provisionally, in whole or in part, by a signatory and/or Party that consents to its provisional application by so notifying the Depositary in writing at the time of signature of the instrument, or signature or deposit of its instrument of ratification, acceptance, approval, formal confirmation or accession. Such provisional application shall become effective from the date of receipt of the notification by the Secretary-General of the United Nations.
In other words, the legislative body is cut out of the approval process and this becomes a cozy deal between –in the case of the US—Tedros and Biden.
There has been growing concern that the legislative powers granted to Congress are being gutted by an impetus to lodge more and more power in the Executive Branch. In fact, the legislative function is being rendered ineffective by 1) the refusal of the Executive to enforce existing law and through 2) the concept of “judicial immunity,” which allows the judiciary enormous discretion to ignore existing law and to “legislate from the bench.” The real power centers are now the Oval Office and the courts. More and more, the legislature is reduced to window dressing.
If indeed the pandemic treaty, which is so controversial and has resulted in a flurry of negative publicity and response, gets cemented through this overturning of established procedure of checks and balances, then we can indeed stop warning about the coming of totalitarianism. It would be here.
Here is a link to the proposed pandemic treaty. Article 35 is on p. 31 https://apps.who.int/gb/inb/pdf_files/inb4/A_INB4_3-en.pdf
I am quite sure that the WHO is the fulfillment of the One-World Government that the evil ones plan to establish over us.
This seems like the perfect time to ask G-d for help. Only He can change this.
For more information:
In other news, a biometric based digital ID is being rolled out, country by country. U.K. government is running a “consultation” on it but didn’t bother to mention, advertise or debate it in parliament. It’s a few weeks long and we know they’ll disregard any feedback. It’ll start this year for tax returns.
In parallel, “15 minute cities” are also being imposed, regardless of the near total negative feedback to councils by citizens. Initially we’ll be permitted to use a car 100 times a year, so that’s once a week out & back, enforced by ANPR and massive fines for non compliance and non registrations. Then they’ll tighten the noose until you can own a car but you can’t use it.
Furthermore, CBDC are coming. They will abolish cash and then all freedoms disappear permanently.
It’s my expectation that citizens will be required to get jabbed repeatedly in order to retain validity of their digital ID, without which they will be unable to spend using their CBDC.
Since mRNA shots, the format of all vaccines once the older ones are reformulated, are injurious. Guess what will happen?
Bill Gates gave nearly twice as much to the WHO as the US, nearly $1.5 billion. Wait until you find out there's a field in Gates' ID2020 (digital ID) for a Pre-Crime score. No, I'm not kidding, Big Brother Watch of the UK reported on it.