Potential Grave Dangers Quietly Being Created in the Food Supply
BS”D
There are some concerning reports from doctors, and from an attorney I know, about the possibility that our food supply could quietly be tampered with in ways that would be detrimental to our health.
I wrote a bit about the topic earlier this month:
I know Dr. Peter McCullough MD, and find him to be of a more reserved nature in his statements; I do not consider him an alarmist in any way.
He has raised the following concerns:
•Plant-based vaccines (see his article below.)
•Vaccines given to swine, which could potentially affect even non-pork-eaters because the medication heparin is made from swine (see his article below.)
•Vaccines which are being developed for cattle (see CHD article below and also Dr. McCullough’s April 17 article titled “Veterinary Replicon Vaccines.”)
•Vaccines being developed to be administered through milk - (See below and Dr. McCullough’s April 7 substack article: “Chinese Load Cow's Milk with mRNA Exosomes--Successfully Immunize Mice, COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Assault Possible Through Food Supply.”)
COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Assault Possible Through Food Supply
Regarding plant-based vaccines, I thought the very idea sounded implausible when I first read about it, but I discovered that apparently, sadly the concept is quite feasible and has been in development for many years.
Dr. McCullough wrote last week:
This paper summarizes a WHO meeting: “In January 2005, WHO conducted a meeting regarding the regulatory evaluation of plant-based vaccine. The meeting ended up by concluding that the existing guidelines for development, evaluation, and use of vaccines made by conventional methods can be applied in the production of edible vaccines. There were specific issues related to edible vaccine. Plant-derived vaccines should be clinically tested under US investigational new drug application, and also must follow all the regulatory and GMP requirements.”
The antigens introduced can be proteins as well as mRNA or DNA forms of genetic code that would be absorbed in the GI tract and then induce production of the foreign antigens by somatic cells. This would raise the problem of autoimmunity now seen with the genetic SARS-CoV-2 vaccines.
Kurup and Thomas give this additional caveat: “Growing plants for edible vaccine production requires close monitoring. The safety and quality of the genetically modified plants will be a difficult task even though manufacturing of genetically modified plants are regulated. Cross-contamination between genetically modified plants and non-genetically modified plants may occur during pollination and the genetically modified plants themselves become aggressive. Sometimes the DNA or the antigen may release into the water sources by the contact of insects or birds with the plants which causes the contamination of water bodies.”
From this and many papers it appears the biopharmaceutical complex is well into the development of genetic vaccines to be delivered in foods. Missouri HB 1169 has enormous importance for transparency. Americans need to know if any genetic product that could change their bodies is consumable in purchased and prepared foods. Whether it has been used to protect animals or intentionally designed to be ingested by humans to induce immunity or some other physiological change—now is the time for transparency and scrutiny over the regulatory process.
And:
See this paragraph from Dr. McCullough’s article Sunday, which also raises the possibility that heparin, a widely used anticlotting agent in hospitalized patients, and which is derived from swine receiving these vaccines, could potentially be tainted and possibly have untoward health effects.
Aida and colleagues have graphically summarized the genetic technologies in use as of 2021 in veterinary medicine. In the consumer meat category at present, only swine are of concern given the use of plasmid DNA, replication incompetent viral vector, and RNA replicon products. Do these technologies cause noninfectious diseases in the animals? Can any of the genetic material survive denaturing during curing and cooking? How about pork intestines harvested for the production of heparin widely used in human medicine? It is conceivable that genetic incorporation of foreign RNA or DNA into humans and production of antigens for example, porcine endemic diarrhea or influenza A, could have untoward effects including autoimmunity similar to that with the COVID-19 vaccines?
Full article here:
See excerpts from Monday’s article by Dr. Joseph Mercola on Children’s Health Defense:
Big Ag Panicking Over Bill to Require Labeling of Gene-Altering Products
Pork producers have been using customizable mRNA-based “vaccines” on their herds since 2018, without telling the public.
All customized mRNA “vaccines” are untested. Only the mRNA platform itself has been approved.
According to the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association, “There are no current mRNA vaccines licensed for use in beef cattle in the United States.” However, a lobbyist for the association claims to have “double-vaccinated” his own herd with an mRNA “vaccine” against bovine respiratory disease.
Iowa State University began trialing an mRNA “vaccine” against bovine respiratory syncytial virus on Oct. 1, 2021.
Missouri House Bill 1169 would require labeling of products that can alter your genes. Big Ag lobbyists strongly oppose it.
… Renz started … sharing evidence that shows the U.S. government has been working on the integration of vaccines into foods for at least two decades.
In an April 2 interview with Naomi Wolf, Ph.D., Renz said:
“[Bill] Gates, the WHO [World Health Organization], a ton of these universities: they’re all talking about including mRNA vaccinations as part of the food. They’re going to modify the genes of these foods to make them mRNA vaccines.”
Industry doesn’t want you to know what they’re doing
The pushback by Big Ag lobbyists against this bill to require industry transparency on this important issue has been enormous, and one potential reason for that is because they’d have to admit that all sorts of foods may have been vaccinated with mRNA vaccines, have genetic modifications, or be modified to serve as vaccinations for humans.
Not only might this destroy Big Ag, but it would also seriously impact any surreptitious attempts by Big Pharma to use the food supply as a tool to distribute vaccines unbeknownst to consumers.
In short, Renz suspects the globalists’ transhumanist agenda is being secretly pushed forward using gene therapy in food production.
I can’t help but wonder whether the industry simply doesn’t understand how mRNA gene therapy in livestock might affect consumers, or whether they want to conceal the fact that they’re using gene therapy because they DO know it can also affect humans.
Globalists like World Economic Forum founder Klaus Schwab have openly admitted that they intend to alter humanity — both on the genetic level and through the incorporation of artificial intelligence and nanotechnology into the human body.
And, using COVID-19 as the cover, they managed to turn the entire world population into test subjects for this dangerous experimentation.
As noted by Renz in the Real America’s Voice interview above, we know for a fact that the mRNA COVID-19 shots have no beneficial impact in terms of preventing COVID-19 infection.
mRNA ‘vaccines’ in livestock are untested
If the mRNA COVID-19 shots don’t prevent infection, why would we assume mRNA shots for viral and bacterial infections in swine work any better?
One of the most disturbing aspects of using mRNA “vaccines” in swine is the fact that all of them are by definition untested. As explained by Merck on its website, its “custom swine vaccine,” Sequivity, is not a vaccine but, rather, a platform that allows for the endless customization of “mRNA vaccines.”
The customized mRNA shots that are created using it are completely untested. Here’s how it works:
A pathogen is collected and sent to a diagnostic lab.
The gene of interest is sequenced and sent electronically to Sequivity analysts.
A synthetic version of the gene of interest is synthesized and inserted into the RNA production platform.
The RNA particles released from incubated production cells are harvested and formulated into a customized “vaccine.”
As noted by Zoetis, the largest producer of veterinary drugs and vaccines:
“Sequivity has safety and efficacy studies based on the platform with a historical initial isolate, not likely the isolate that customers would be requesting in their product.”
What was that initial isolate? Will mRNA against a bacterial disease affect the animals in the same way that mRNA against a viral infection does?
What “genes of interest” are being chosen? If spike proteins are selected, might they be as pathogenic as the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein?
In CAFO environments with high populations of animals, won’t mutations become rampant as the bacteria and viruses are subjected to constant “customized” vaccination pressure to adapt and become more dangerous? These are just some of the questions that need answers.
At the end of the day, the fact that mRNA shots can be endlessly customized without safety testing shows just how broken the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration are.
There’s simply no way they can guarantee that customized mRNA shots are safe. The fact that the platform itself works and allows for this customization does NOT prove the safety and effectiveness of the shots being cooked up.
Approval of the platform also does not prove the food is safe for consumption after it’s been treated with mRNA.
Cows milk used to immunize mice
As reported by Dr. Peter McCullough, Chinese researchers have demonstrated that food can indeed be turned into a vaccine.
“The nation’s food supply can be manipulated by public health agencies to influence population outcomes … Now an oral route of administration is being considered specifically for COVID-19 vaccination using mRNA in cow’s milk.
“Zhang and colleagues have demonstrated that a shortened mRNA code of 675 base pairs could be loaded into phospholipid packets called exosomes derived from milk and then using that same milk, be fed to mice.
“The mice gastrointestinal tract absorbed the exosomes and the mRNA must have made it into the bloodstream and lymphatic tissue because antibodies were produced in fed mice against SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein (receptor binding domain) …
“Given the damage mRNA vaccines have generated in terms of injuries, disabilities, and deaths, these data raise considerable ethical issues. The COVID States project has shown that 25% of Americans were successful in remaining unvaccinated.
“This group would have strong objections to mRNA in the food supply, particularly if it was done surreptitiously or with minimal labeling/warnings …
“For those who have taken one of the COVID-19 vaccines, having milk vaccines as an EUA offering would allow even more loading of the body with synthetic mRNA which has been proven resistant to ribonucleases and may reside permanently in the human body.
“These observations lead me to conclude that mRNA technology has just entered a whole new, much darker phase of development. Expect more research on and resistance to mRNA in our food supply. The Chinese have just taken the first of what will probably be many more dangerous steps for the world.”
Will beef be treated with mRNA too?
At present, there’s no evidence to suggest beef cattle are being treated with customizable mRNA “vaccines,” either in Europe or the U.S. The National Cattlemen’s Beef Association has also denied it, saying “there are no current mRNA vaccines licensed for use in beef cattlein the United States.”
That said, the Cattlemen’s Association previously confirmed they do, eventually, intend to use mRNA shots in cattle, which might affect both dairy and beef.
Time will tell whether public outrage will halt such plans. Clearly, the Cattlemen’s Association is concerned about internet rumors that it’s already in use.
On April 3, Texas Department of Agriculture commissioner Sid Miller issued a statement promising to conduct a risk assessment of the technology before its adoption:
“Since news of the development of mRNA vaccines and mRNA-related treatments for livestock came to the attention of the Texas Department of Agriculture, we have been working towards developing a fact and science-based assessment of the risks associated with this technology.
“Our analysis will include the clinical research, the structure of existing Texas law, and the public policy, economic, and production impact of the different policy prescriptions we may adopt. I aim to ensure that Texas agriculture remains safe, trusted, healthy, and wholly uninfected by dangerous or unproven technology.
“I personally take this issue very seriously. No political hot takes. Just a well-reasoned and well-researched proposal based on a wide range of input from stakeholders, scientists, agriculturalists, and other experts. We are looking at this issue at TDA and will share your concerns. Please stay tuned.”
Confusion caused by cattlemen’s association lobbyist
https://twitter.com/RenzTom/status/1645416058415718402?s=20
What’s causing significant confusion on this issue is a statement made by National Cattlemen’s Beef Association lobbyist Shannon Cooper before the Missouri House.
Cooper told the House members he had recently “double-vaccinated” his herd with “vaccinations that have this mRNA.” According to Cooper, the mRNA “vaccine” given was for bovine respiratory disease.
Is he confused? Did he mistakenly believe the vaccine he gave had mRNA in it? Or is the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association incorrect in stating there are no approved mRNA vaccines for cattle in the U.S.? Or, are experimental mRNA shots being used without approval? Who knows at this point?
What we do know is that mRNA “vaccines” against bovine respiratory disease are being developed. Iowa State University began trialing an mRNA “vaccine” against bovine respiratory syncytial virus on Oct. 1, 2021.
The project end date is listed as Sept. 30, 2026. According to the trial submission, mice would be used to establish proof of concept. Cows would be used in year two of the trial. Assuming they’re on schedule, that means cows will be experimented on somewhere in late 2023 and/or 2024.
Full CHD article on this link:
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/big-ag-gene-mrna-vaccines-livestock-cola/
See also this article, which I found concerning:
Being perpetually vaccinated by food would be obscene. Can you imagine the variable 'dose' people would consume depending on diet? I wonder how stabilized a food based 'vaccine' could even be?
There is nothing positive about any of this. Why would we trust the very government & PHARMA companies who perpetrated this horror on the world to begin with. They are not satisfied with the 75% of the people who willingly, for whatever reason, went along with this democide scheme, now they want to make sure every living thing on this earth is contaminated with this poison. Until the people stand up & get very noisy & let them know they will not go quietly into this darkness, they will not stop. I fear there is something in those shots to make people docile, otherwise why aren’t they getting very angry about what has been done to them & their loved ones. And the 25% can’t sit back & hope for the best.