The Earthquake is Beginning: Voices of Truth are Growing
Chanuka miracles
BS”D
Chanuka is a time in which miracles are more likely to happen. It’s a spiritual force that’s built into these days, and it comes back each year. So let’s talk about some miracles that are now happening, which give us renewed hope that we’re seeing a breakthrough in public awareness.
•Last week, there was an amazing debate in the UK parliament. Andrew Bridgen, a Member of Parliament for Northwest Leicestershire, delivered an electrifying truth speech in Parliament about the “vaccines.” This video by Dr. John Campbell, containing MP Bridgen’s talk, already has over 600,000 views. (I included a written transcript of it as well, below.)
•Next, top physician Dr. Ahmad Malik joined Dr. Aseem Malhotra in speaking out, saying he agrees with MP Andrew Bridgen that the vaccines should be halted.
If you can’t click the link above, here’s a screenshot summary of Dr. Ahmad Malik:
I’m grateful to Etana Hecht for telling me about these amazing developments. From Etana’s article, another prominent voice speaking out as well:
A UK politician named Kishan Devani, a member of the Green LibDem party allowed himself to publicly add his voice to the group of professionals questioning the COVID vaccine narrative.
Trust me, Andrew Bridgen’s Parliamentary speech is worth watching. (And I rarely watch anything.)
If you can’t watch it, here the auto-transcript of Dr. Campbell’s link. I touched it up as best as I could for punctuation and readability.
Dr. John Campbell:
And, welcome to this talk, Tuesday the 13th of December.
Now, we like to cover information and things going on in this channel related to health and well-being, and there’s been a debate related to health and well-being, but it's been carried on just this evening in the UK Parliament, and we're going to hear from Mr. Andrew Bridgen, a Member of Parliament for Northwest Leicestershire. So over to Mr. Bridgen now.
(MP Andrew Bridgen begins)
“Eminent and trusted cardiologist, a man with an international reputation, Dr. Aseem Malhotra, published peer-reviewed research that concluded that there should be a complete cessation in the administration of the covid MRNA vaccines for everyone because of clear and robust data of significant harms, and little ongoing benefit.
He described the rollout of the Biontech Pfizer vaccine as perhaps the greatest miscarriage of Medical Science, damage to population health, erosion of trust in public health and attack on Democracy that we will witness in our lifetime. Interesting, Madam Deputy speaker, there's not been a single rebuttal so far in the scientific literature to Dr Malhotra’s findings despite its widespread circulation and making international news.
Before I state the key evidence-based facts that make a clear case for complete suspension of these emergency use authorization vaccines, it's important to appreciate the key psychological barrier as to why these facts have not been acknowledged by policy makers and taken up by the UK mainstream media.
That psychological phenomenon is willful blindness.
This is when human beings, including, in this case, institutions, turn a blind eye to the truth in order to feel safe, reduce anxiety, avoid conflict, and protect their prestige and reputations.
There are numerous examples of this occurring in recent history such as at the BBC with Jimmy Savile, the Departmentof Health and mid-staffs, Hollywood and Harvey Weinstein, and specifically in the medical establishment, the Oxycontin Scandal, which was portrayed in the mini-series “Dope Stick.”
What’s crucial to understand is that the longer willful blindness to the truth continues, the more unnecessary harm it creates.
So here are the cold hard facts on the MRNA vaccines, and an explanation of the structural drivers that continue to be barriers to doctors and the public receiving independent information to make informed decisions about these vaccines.
Since the rollout in the UK of the biontech Pfizer mRNA vaccine, we've had almost half a million Yellow Card reports of adverse effects from the public. Madame Deputy Speaker, this is unprecedented; it is more than all the Yellow Card combined reports of the last 40 years. Such an extraordinary rate of side effects, which are beyond mild, have been reported in many countries across the world that have used the Pfizer vaccine, including, of course, the United States.
(Another MP asks to speak)
Of course I'll give away to The Honorable gentleman.
(The other MP begins)
I thank him for giving away. I spoke to the Honorable gentleman beforehand, he knows my feelings about the vaccines, I’m a supporter of the vaccines, many of my family are as well. But I understand where the Honorable gentleman is coming from, I've had some constituents have come to me and (unclear) we need to ensure in this House, we acknowledge risks and don't simply relegate them to fine print.
(Back to MP Andrew Bridgen)
It’s absolutely right that those who feel they've been damaged by the the vaccine should of course have the full support of the elected members of parliament and of course the full support of the NHS.
It’s interesting that only a couple of weeks ago I was interviewed by a journalist from a major news outlet who said that he was being bombarded by calls from people who said that they were vaccine harmed, but unable to get the support they wanted from the NHS, and he also said that he thought this would be the biggest scandal in the medical history in this country. And, disturbingly, he also said that if he were to mention that in the Newsroom in which he worked, he would fear that he would lose his job.
And it is this conspiracy of Silence that we need to break.
Madam Deputy speaker, it's instructive to note that traditionally, according to pharmacovigilance analysis, when it comes to Serious adverse effects what is actually reported by the public is thought to only represent 10 percent of the true rate of serious Adverse Events occurring within the population.
The gold standard of understanding the benefit and harm of any drug comes from the randomized control trial. It’s the randomized controlled trial conducted by Pfizer that led to the UK and international Regulators approving the Biontech Pfizer mRNA vaccine in the first place for administration.
Contrary to popular belief, that original trial of approximately 40,000 participants did not show any statistically significant reduction in death as a result of vaccination, but it did show a 95 percent relative risk reduction in the development of infection against the ancestral, more lethal strain of the virus. However, the absolute risk reduction for an individual was only 0.84 percent. In other words, from their own data, Pfizer revealed that you needed to vaccinate 119 people to prevent one infection. The World Health Organization and the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges have previously stated and made it clear that it's an ethical responsibility that medical information is communicated to patients in absolute benefit and absolute risk terms. This is to protect the public from unnecessary anxiety and manipulation.
Very quickly, through mutations of that original strain, indeed within a few months, fortunately it became far less lethal, and it quickly became apparent that there was no protection against infection from the vaccine at all, and we were left with the hope that perhaps these vaccines would protect us from serious illness and death.
So what does the most reliable data tell us about the best case scenario of individual benefit from the vaccine against dying from covid-19?
Real world data from the UK during the three-month wave of Omicron at the beginning of this year reveals that you'd need to vaccinate 7,300 people over the age of 80 to prevent one death. The number needed to be vaccinated to prevent a death in any younger age group was absolutely enormous.
(Another MP wants to speak)
I will of course give way to my honorable friend.
I'm very grateful to him for giving away and for bringing this debate to the House. It’s a very important debate that we should be having. He’s just talking there about the relative risks for different cohorts of the population. He’ll remember that when the vaccine was first announced, the intention was that it would only be used for those who had - those who were vulnerable and the and the elderly, because as he says, the expectation was that the benefit to younger people was was minor. Do you think it would be helpful to see, does he agree with me that it would be helpful for the minister to explain to us why the original advice that the vaccines would only be rolled out for the older population, and would not be used for children in particular, why that original advice was laid aside, and we ended up with a rollout for the entire population including children?
(Back to MP Andrew Bridgen)
I thank my honorable friend the member (unclear) for that intervention and his support on this very important issue. Of course it's important that the government justify why they're rolling out a vaccine to any cohort of people, in particular our children. He will recall in the Westminster Hall debate that we we questioned the validity of vaccinating children who have minimal risk, if at all, from the virus, but there's a clear risk from the vaccine. And I will again report on evidence from America later in my speech, regarding those risks to to particularly young children. So in other words the benefits of the vaccine are close to to non-existent. Beyond the alarming Yellow Card reports, the strongest evidence of harm comes from the gold standard, highest possible quality level data, a re-analysis of the Pfizer / Moderna’s own randomized control trials using the mRNA technology published in the peer review journal Vaccine, revealed a rate of serious Adverse Events of one in 800 individuals vaccinated. These are events that result in hospitalization, disability, or are life-changing. What is most disturbing of all, however, is that of those original trials suggesting that someone was far more likely to suffer a serious side effect from the vaccine than to be hospitalized with the ancestral, more lethal strain of the virus. These findings Madam Deputy speaker, are a Smoking Gun, suggesting that the vaccine should likely never have been approved in the first place. In the past vaccines have been completely withdrawn from use for a much lower instance of serious harm. For example the swine flu vaccine was withdrawn in 1976 for causing Guillain Barre syndrome in only one in one hundred thousand adults. And in 1999, the rotavirus vaccine was withdrawn for causing a form of bowel obstruction in children affecting one in ten thousand.
With a covid mRNA vaccine we're talking of a serious adverse event rate of at least one in 800, because that's the rate determined in the two months that that Pfizer actually followed the patients following their vaccination.
Unfortunately, some of those serious events affecting such as heart attack, stroke, or pulmonary embolism, will result in death, which is devastating for individuals and the families they leave behind. And, many of these may take longer than eight weeks post-vaccination to show themselves.
An Israeli paper published in Nature Scientific Reports showed a 25 percent increase in heart attack and cardiac arrest in 16 to 39 year olds in Israel.
And another report from Israel, which is looking at the level of myocarditis and pericarditis in people who've had covid and those who hadn't - it was a study I think of 1.2 million who hadn’t had covid and 740,000 who had had covid. The incidence of myocarditis and pericarditis was in identical in both groups. This would tell the House that whatever is causing the increase in heart problems now, it's not due to having been infected with the covid-19 vaccine. (BW note: Mr. Bridgen clearly meant to say virus, not vaccine.)
It was accepted by a peer-reviewed medical journal that one of the nation’s most respected and decorated General Practitioners, honorary vice president of the BMA, and the labor party's doctor of the Year, Dr. Carlos Chand, likely suffered a cardiac arrest and was tragically killed by the Pfizer vaccine, six months after his second dose through a mechanism that rapidly accelerates heart disease.
In fact, in the UK, Madam Deputy speaker, we've had an extra 14,000 out of hospital cardiac arrests in 2021, compared to 2020, following the vaccine rollout. Many of these will undoubtedly be because of the vaccine, and the consequence of this MRNA jab are clearly serious and common.
(Another MP requests to speak)
I'm very grateful and I think he’s making a very interesting and important speech, and in particular he’s giving a lot of detail about the Pfizer vaccine. Does he have similar concerns about other vaccines, and if so, will he be talking about those later in his speech?
(MP Andrew Bridgen resumes)
I thank my honorable friend for that interjection. Clearly, this is relating to all mRNA vaccinations. He will be well aware that many of us will have had the AstraZeneca vaccine that has effectively been withdrawn because of health concerns around it.
Indeed I'll declare to the House I'm double vaccinated with AstraZeneca, which has now been withdrawn.
The ministers may understandably wish to defer responsibility for a decision such as withdrawing the vaccines from the population to the Regulators such as the MHRA, or in America, they'd be the FDA.
Historically, when undertaking the approval of any drug, the Regulators themselves ultimately end up relying on the summary results of the drug companies in their sponsored trials, where the raw data is kept commercially confidential. Furthermore, the mhra has a huge financial conflict of interest, receiving 86 percent of its funding from the pharmaceutical industry they are supposed to regulate.
In effect, Madam Deputy speaker, we've got the poacher paying the gamekeeper.
As pointed out in a recent BMJ investigation into the financial conflicts of interest of the drug Regulators, Sociologist Donald Light said of them, it's the opposite of having a trustworthy organization independently, rigorously assessing medicines. They’re not rigorous, they’re not independent, they’re selective, and they withhold data.
Doctors and patients must appreciate how deeply and extensively drug Regulators can't be trusted, so long as they're captured by the industry funding.
Similarly, another investigation revealed that members of the JCVI have huge financial links to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, running to billions of pounds. The ministers, the media, and the public know that the foundation itself is heavily invested in the pharmaceutical industry stocks.
Unfortunately the catastrophic mistake over the approval and the coercion associated with this emergency use authorization medical intervention is not an anomaly, but in many ways it could have been predicted, by structural failures that have allowed this to occur in the first place. These shortcomings are rooted in the increasingly unchecked visible and invisible power of multinational corporations, in this case, big Pharma.
We start by acknowledging that the drug industry has a fiduciary obligation to produce profit for their shareholders.
Madam Deputy speaker, they have no fiduciary obligation to provide the right medicines for patients. The real scandal is that those with a responsibility of patients and scientific integrity, namely doctors, academic institutions, and medical journals, collude with the industry for financial gain.
Big Pharma exerts its power by capturing the political environment through lobbying, the knowledge environment through funding University Research and influencing medical education, preference shaping through capture of the media, financing think tanks, etc, etc.
In other words, the PR machinery of Pharma excels in subterfuge, engages in smearing and de-platforming those who call out their manipulations.
No doubt, Madame Deputy speaker, they will be very busy this evening.
It’s no surprise that because there's so much control by an entity that has been described as Psychopathic for its profit-making conduct, that one analysis suggests that the third most common cause of death globally, after heart disease and cancer, is because of the side effects of prescribed medications which were mostly avoidable.
Because of these systemic failures, doctors often receive biased information, deliberately manipulated by the pharmaceutical industry, that exaggerates the benefits and also exaggerates the safety of their drugs.
Furthermore, the former editor of the BMJ, Richard Smith, claims that research misconduct is rife, and is not effectively being tackled in the UK institutions.
He states, “something is rotten in British medicine, and it has been for a long time.”
Madame Deputy speaker, it's also been brought to my attention by a whistleblower, from a very reliable source, that one of these institutions is covering up clear data that reveals the MRNA vaccine increases inflammation of the heart arteries.
They are covering this up in fear that they may lose funding from the pharmaceutical industry.
The lead of that Cardiology research department has a prominent leadership role with the British Heart Foundation, and I'm very disappointed to say that he has sent out non-disclosure agreements to his research team, to ensure that this important data never sees the light of day.
This, Madame Deputy speaker, is an absolute disgrace.
Systemic failure in an over-medicated population also contributes to huge waste of British taxpayers’ money and increasing strain on the NHS.
(Another MP requests to speak)
I will give away on that point.
(The other MP begins)
It’s been very good, with this time I just wanted to call his attention to the research that - I chair the all-party Parliamentary group on prescribed drug dependency, and he refers to the waste of money - as 500 million pounds being spent every year by the NHS on prescribed drugs for people who shouldn’t be on those habit-forming pills - enormous human misery as well as waste from the taxpayer.
(MP Bridgen resumes speaking)
My honorable friend for making a point which only reinforces the items in my speech, which the public need to know, and I thank him again for his support.
We clearly need an inquiry into the influence of big Pharma on medications and our NHS.
And this has been called for on many occasions (unclear) by some very, very influential people including prominent Physicians, such as the former president of the Royal College of Physicians and personal doctor to our former Queen, Sir Richard Thompson.
On separate occasions in the last few years these calls have been supported also, and covered in the DailyMail the Guardian, and most recently The Iron newspaper.
We’re not just fighting for principles of of ethical evidence-based Medical Practice here, but we're also fighting for our democracy.
The future health of the British public depends on us tackling head-on the cause of this problem and finding meaningful solutions.
In 2015, a commentary by Richard Horton, editor-in-chief of the Lancet, suggested that possibly half of the published medical literature may simply be untrue!
He wrote that science has taken a turn towards darkness and asked who is going to take the first step to clean up the system?
Well, Madam Deputy speaker, that first step could start this evening, with this debate.
It starts here, and the vaccine Minister and the government ensuring in the first instance that there needs to be an immediate and complete suspension of any more covid vaccines and their use of mRNA technology.
Madam Deputy speaker, silence on this issue is more contagious than the virus itself.
Now, so should courage be.
And I would implore all the scientists, the Medics, the nurses, and those in the media who know the truth about the harm these vaccines are causing to our people, to speak out.
Madame Deputy speaker, we've already sacrificed, in my view, far too many of our citizens on the altar of ignorance and unfettered corporate greed.
Last week, the MHRA authorized these experimental vaccines for use on children as young as six months.
A report which I've already quoted in Westminster Hall debate some weeks ago, by the Journal of American Medical association, studying the effects of the covid-19 MRNA vaccination on children under five years of age, showed that one in 200 had an adverse event which resulted in hospitalization, and had symptoms that lasted longer than 90 days.
As the data clearly shows to anyone who wants to look at it, the MRNA vaccines - they're not safe, they’re not effective, and they're not necessary. I implore the government to halt their use immediately.
And, as I've demonstrated, and the data clearly shows, that the government's current policy on the MRNA vaccines is on the wrong side of medical ethics, it's on the wrong side of scientific data, and ultimately, Madam Deputy speaker, it will be on the wrong side of history.
(End of MP Andrew Bridgen’s talk in Parliament)
Dr. Campbell:
Hopefully we'll have some more of that debate shortly on the channel.
They were the views of Mr Andrew Bridgen, Member of Parliament. Thank you for watching.
Note: Dr. Campbell adds the conclusion, it seems to me, to avoid getting deplatformed on YouTube for the “blasphemous” anti-vaccine speech he just played for his audience.
May we merit many more public awakenings very soon!
Much louder and more qualified voices have been doing this since the start. The harms evidence has been blatantly obvious and evidential data available since the beginning. How else could so many critical thinking laypeople have become so well informed, and lowered their chances of premature disability or death, yet these newcomer professional experts have only now twigged?
I smell a rat. We must not underestimate how stupid Team Evil thinks the Profane really are, and given the last few years, they might have a point. Bridgen, Campbell, Malhotra - don’t know Malik - all pushed these deadly poisons this whole time and are now suddenly the support act for The Slow Reveal who we should just trust and revere?
Professors Norman Fenton and Angus Dalgleish, quite recent conscripts to Team Truth, are the types of new recruits we should be championing.
I want to be positive and take strength from these other recent newcomers but they are simply conspicuously too late and conspicuously getting a platform. Here’s what’s more likely:
- the end of the global experimental clinical trial was always slated to end in 2023 (Q1 if memory serves)
- it will be deemed a failure, products will be recalled, there will be some feigned accountability, maybe even a Big Harma pfall guy (notice how most of the heat lately has been on Pfizer and MRNA jabs specifically)
- some faux mea culpas, a resignation or two, maybe even a token conviction or two for professional malfeasance, medical recklessness, clinical endangerment, perhaps even some corporate manslaughter charges
- no one will mention democide, genocide, crimes against humanity or Nuremberg
- the sheep will be herded into the ‘cockup not conspiracy” meadow
- all those earlier dissidents will be reinstated, pardoned, given back their social media accounts etc
- unvaxxed blood banks and reversing spike protein damage will be boom biotechs
All I want for Christmas is for more politicians to stand up, realize there is strength in numbers (They cannot kill you all, people will notice) and for it to be on the NIGHTLY NEWS, so the zombies I currently call countrymen will wake the eff up.