Tucker Carlson goes “too far” telling the TRUTH - What was he revealing that made Fox FIRE their TOP host?

I feel that great things are on the way. “The more you tell the truth, the stronger you become.”

BS”D

It is thrilling to hear the truth finally being bluntly, publicly spoken. It is infinitely more rewarding, the more people you know are hearing it along with you.

And now, millions of Americans are learning the most critical information, which their very lives may depend on - and it’s everything that those controlling the media have kept from us and gaslighted us into disbelieving, for their own evil purposes.

One or more of the clips you’ll see here evidently got Tucker Carlson, the most popular television host in the US, fired yesterday. That says A LOT. He is hitting very hard, getting way too close to the evil, rotten core of the government and corporate interests who have a stranglehold on society. He’s calling out the wickedness for what it is.

Mark C. Miller quoted Robert F. Kennedy, April 24:

Fox fires Tucker Carlson five days after he crosses the red line by acknowledging that the TV networks pushed a deadly and ineffective vaccine to please their Pharma advertisers. Carlson’s breathtakingly courageous April 19 monologue broke TV’s two biggest rules: Tucker told the truth about how greedy Pharma advertisers controlled TV news content and he lambasted obsequious newscasters for promoting jabs they knew to be lethal and worthless. For many years, Tucker has had the nation's biggest audience averaging 3.5 million — 10 times the size of CNN. Fox just demonstrated the terrifying power of Big Pharma.

Watch this ultra powerful 16 minutes, or see excerpts of the transcript below the video. This show might have been what got him fired:

ASK YOURSELF.
IS ANY NEWS ORGANIZATION YOU
KNOW OF SO CORRUPT, THAT IT'S
WILLING TO HURT YOU ON BEHALF OF ITS BIGGEST ADVERTISERS?
ANYONE WHO WOULD DO THAT IS
OBVIOUSLY “PABLO ESCOBAR” LEVEL OF
CORRUPT AND SHOULD NOT BE
TRUSTED. WHAT WOULD THAT LOOK LIKE? THAT LEVEL OF CORRUPTION?

Tucker went on to imagine the government telling everyone that they have to buy, for example, a certain pillow, or they’d lose their jobs and societal privileges. Even as it became clear that the “pillow”caused heart attacks. And he imagined a news channel going along with the narrative and pushing the “pillow,” while knowing it was killing people, but still continuously vilifying anyone who refused it as an enemy of the state and an enemy of science.

THE OTHER CHANNELS TOOKS HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF DOLLARS FROM BIG PHARMA COMPANIES AND THEN THEY SHILLED FOR THEIR SKETCHY PRODUCTS ON THE AIR. AND AS THEY DID THAT, THEY MALIGNED ANYONE WHO WAS SKEPTICAL OF THOSE PRODUCTS.

At the very least, this was a moral crime. It was disgusting. But it was universal.

It happened accross the American news media. They all did it. So, at this point, the question isn’t who in public life is corrupt, it’s too many to count.

The question is, who is telling the truth? There are not many of those.

One of them is Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. Robert Kennedy knew early that the covid vaccines were both ineffective and potentially dangerous, and he said so in public to the extent that he was allowed. Science has since proven Robert F. Kennedy right, unequivocally right. But Kennedy was not rewarded for this. He was vilified, he was censored, because he dared to criticize their advertisers. The news media called Bobby Kennedy a Nazi and then attacked his family.

And on shocking revelations in Ukraine:

… NOT ONLY HAS THE BIDEN
ADMINISTRATION BEEN MAINTAINING
THESE LABS IN UKRAINE IN THE
MIDDLE OF A WAR, IT ALSO HAS,
QUOTE, “SENSITIVE NUCLEAR
TECHNOLOGY” IN UKRAINE AS WELL.

And no, we’re not making that up. They admitted it today. Watch.

>> WELL, UKRAINIAN STAFF ARE
STILL OPERATING A NUCLEAR POWER
PLANT. IT DOES FALL UNDER THE
CONTROL OF RUSSIAN ARMED FORCES
AND IS CURRENTLY BEING MANAGED
BY RUSSIA'S STATE OWNED NUCLEAR
ENERGY FIRM, SO THIS IS A SIGNIFICANT CONCERN.

ESSENTIALLY IN THIS LETTER THAT
HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY CNN, SENT BY
THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, THEY WARNED RUSSIA NOT TO TOUCH THE NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, BECAUSE OF THE SENSITIVE AMERICAN NUCLEAR
TECHNOLOGY AT THE PLANT.

Tucker: So many questions here, but we begin with the biggest one.

What exactly is, quote, “sensitive American nuclear technology?”
PROBABLY NOT TO PRODUCE ENERGY.

No one in the media’s going to ask that question, but if it’s in the middle of Ukraine, in the middle of a war, it stands to reason this sensitive American nuclear technology has military applications.

In other words, these are nuclear weapons. What else could they be?

We’ll stop speculating there.
But take three steps back.
This is all so crazy and reckless, it’s hard to believe it’s happening.
Here you have a democratic President gone completely off the rails, completely, with
existentially dangerous consequences that can only hurt the United States.
A WAR WITH NO UPSIDE. It is awful to watch.

Sasha Latypova wrote this of Tucker’s talk:

… I learned something new about my home town, Zaporizhzhya! Turns out, the US DOD is making nukes at the nuclear powerplant in my home city (@ around 4 minutes). Thank you, Tucker, for this information.

I already knew about the biolabs in Ukraine, 46+ of them, but that didn’t worry me as much… I already knew about Obama/Biden regime turning Ukraine into trafficking/laundromat for themselves and their criminal associates. I even knew about the US DOD flying military planes and drones for service into Zaporizhzhya’s Motor Sich aircraft engine manufacturing facility. I was informed of this by my friend who is a customs broker and serviced the US DOD account. But nukes within 150 miles of the Russian border?

What country do we live in, really?

Maybe Tucker’s extremely forthright talk at the Heritage Foundation on April 21 is what got him fired from Fox? (These are excerpts; video is below.)

…But here are two conclusions I’ve come to, which I think are slightly less depressing than the most obvious, which is the country’s really going at high speed in the wrong direction, yeah, no kidding, in ways that are just unfathomable.

The first is, you look around, and you see so many people break under the strain, under the downward pressure of whatever this is that we’re going through.

And you look with disdain and sadness as you see people you know become quislings, you see them revealed as cowards, you see them going along with a new, new thing, which is clearly a poisonous thing, a silly thing, saying things they don’t believe because they want to keep their jobs.

And you’re so disappointed in people. You are. And you realize that the herd instinct is maybe the strongest instinct.

The instinct, which again, is inherent to be like everybody else and not to be cast out of the group, not to be shunned.

That’s a very strong impulse in all of us from birth. And it takes over, unfortunately, in moments like this, and it’s harnessed, in fact, by bad people in moments like this to produce uniformity. And you see people going along with this, and you lose respect for them. And that’s certainly happened to me at scale over the past three years.

I’m not mad at people; I’m just sad. I’m disappointed. How could you go along with this? You know it’s not true, but you’re saying it anyway.

Really, you’re putting your pronouns in your email. You’re ridiculous. But no one else thinks it’s ridiculous. “Oh no, it’s the pronouns in the email.”

What does that even mean? What does that even mean? You’re saying things you can’t define. LBGTQIA+, who’s the plus? The plus is invited to my show anytime. Find a plus, and I’ll interview them. What’s it like to be a plus? Am I a plus? I’m serious. I feel like I’m an addition. Does that make me a plus? No one even knows what it is. And the whole society, “LBGTQIA+.”

But:

“… once you say one true thing and stick with it, all kinds of other true things occur to you, the truth is contagious. Lying is, but the truth is as well, and the second you decide to tell the truth about something, you are filled with this… you are filled with this power from somewhere else - try it, tell the truth about something, you feel it every day, the more you tell the truth the stronger you become. That’s completely real, it's measurable in the way that you feel, and of course the opposite is also true. The more you lie, the weaker and more terrified you become. We all know that feeling - you lie about something and all of a sudden you're a prisoner of that lie, you are diminished by it, you are weak and afraid.

Drug and alcohol use is the same way. It makes you weak and afraid. But you look around, and you see these people, and some of them really have paid a heavy price for telling the truth. And they are cast out of their groups, whatever those groups are, but they do it anyway.

And I look on at those people with the deepest possible admiration.

No one is trained to stand up in the middle of a [diversity, equity, and inclusion] meeting at Citibank and say, “This is nonsense.” And the people who do that, oh, they have my deepest admiration.

And so, their example really gives me hope. It thrills me. I talk to them all day long, people like that. That’s the first thing.

We should, in this sad moment of profound and widespread destruction of the institutions, that people who share our views built, by the way—earlier generations that would agree substantially with every person in this room, they built those, and now they’re being destroyed.

And oh, that’s so depressing. But we can also see rising in the distance, new things, new institutions led by new people who are every bit as brave as the people who came before us.

… it might be time to start to reassess the terms we use to describe what we’re watching.

So, when I started at Heritage, the presumption was, and this is a very Anglo-American assumption, that the debates we’re having are rational debates about the way to get to mutually agreed-upon outcomes.

So, we all want the country to be more prosperous and free, and people to be less oppressed or whatever. And so, we’re going to argue about tax rates. And I think higher tax gets us there. I’m a Keynesian and you disagree, you’re an Austrian or whatever, but the objective is the same.

And so, we write our papers, and they write their papers, and may the best papers win.

I don’t think that’s what we’re watching now at all. I don’t think we’re watching a debate over how to get to the best outcome. I think that’s completely wrong.

There is no way to assess, say, the transgender movement with that mind-set.

Policy papers don’t account for it at all. If you have people who are saying, “I have an idea. Let’s castrate the next generation. Let’s sexually mutilate children.” I’m sorry, that’s not a political debate. What? That’s nothing to do with politics. What’s the outcome we’re desiring here? An androgynous population? Are we arguing for that? I don’t think anyone could defend that as a positive outcome, but the weight of the government and a lot of corporate interests are behind that.

Well, what is that? Well, it’s irrational. If you say, “Well, I think abortion is always bad. (Or) “Well, I think sometimes it’s necessary.”

That’s a debate I’m familiar with. But if you’re telling me that abortion is a positive good, what are you saying? Well, you’re arguing for child sacrifice, obviously.

But when the Treasury secretary stands up and says, “You know what you can do to help the economy? Get an abortion.” Well, that’s like an Aztec principle, actually.

Well, what’s the point of child sacrifice? Well, there’s no policy goal entwined with that. No, that’s a theological phenomenon.

And that’s kind of the point I’m making. None of this makes sense in conventional political terms. When people, or crowds of people, or the largest crowd of people at all, which is the federal government, the largest human organization in human history, decide that the goal is to destroy things, destruction for its own sake, “Hey, let’s tear it down,” what you’re watching is not a political movement. It’s evil.

So, if you want to assess, and … I’ll put it in nonpolitical … terms, and just say, if you want to know what’s evil and what’s good, what are the characteristics of those?

Well, I mean, good is characterized by order, calmness, tranquility, peace, whatever you want to call it, lack of conflict, cleanliness. Cleanliness is next to Godliness. It’s true. It is.

And evil is characterized by their opposites. Violence, hate, disorder, division, disorganization, and filth. So, if you are all in on the things that produce the latter basket of outcomes, what you’re really advocating for is evil. That’s just true. I’m not calling for religious war. Far from it. I’m merely calling for an acknowledgement of what we’re watching…

I’m not making a partisan point at all. I’m just noting what’s super-obvious. Those of us who were in our mid-50s are caught in the past in the way that we think about this. One side’s like, “No, no, I’ve got this idea, and we’ve got this idea, and let’s have a debate about our ideas.”

They don’t want a debate. Those ideas won’t produce outcomes that any rational person would want under any circumstances. Those are manifestations of some larger force acting upon us. It’s just so obvious. It’s completely obvious.

And I think two things: One, we should say that and stop engaging in these totally fraudulent debates, where .. as if maybe I could just win the debate if I marshaled more facts.

I’ve tried. That doesn’t work. And two, maybe we should all take just 10 minutes a day to say a prayer about it. I’m serious.

Video:

Smaller excerpt:

https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/1650299174066216961?s=20

Maybe Tucker was fired because of his scathing exposure of the corrupt Biden crime family?

https://twitter.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1649530183840350209?s=20

Or was it his revelations about the election fraud with the Dominion voting machines, which (while true!) led to Fox having to pay Dominion an $787.5 MILLION settlement?

https://www.nbcnews.com/media/live-blog/-fox-news-dominion-trial-live-updates-rcna79492

Vigilant Fox pointed out:

One also has to think of Tucker’s coverage of the January 6 tapes (BW: which showed that the official government narrative had been one huge lie.)

..In light of harsh media and political backlash, one has to wonder if Fox News pulled the plug on further tapes being revealed.

Probably it was everything all together.

Fox’s stocks immediately plunged yesterday after the firing:

Good.

Fox is owned in large part by Black Rock, by the way. Black Rock’s share of Fox is 15.1% now. This is very significant. (The Murdoch family owns 19%.)

To understand just how powerful and dangerous Black Rock is, watch this very informative short video.

I feel that the Creator is giving us gifts, bursts of light in this dark time. When someone that millions of people listen to has found the courage to call out evil, even as he knows he is going up against the most powerful corporations in the world, this can set a powerful example for others to follow.

Tucker’s being let go from Fox is another gift. Now that he is disentangled from them, hopefully he will say even more and reach an even wider audience.

The truth cannot be stopped.

Lies and evil always fall.

I have been on a campaign, asking respected doctors and scientists, whom people have learned to trust for the truth about the global agenda, to please start talking about returning to faith in One G-d, the Creator of the world, and living by His precepts of morality - because this is the only way out of the train wreck society has descended into.

Please join this movement.

For more about my take on this, please see what I wrote last week - how society has been systematically gaslighted and brainwashed out of the (very rational!) previously universal belief in the Creator: