An Open Letter to the Establishment: YES, You HAVE Lost Our Trust, and won’t be getting it back.
IT’S OVER. It took a while, but we’ve caught on to your game. My message to the corrupt medical agencies and media as they mourn declining childhood vaccination rates: Get lost.
BS”D
Dear Dishonorable Fauci, Obfuscating Offit, Murderous Mandy at the Central Death Committee (a.k.a. CDC), Lying NY Times, and all your Colleagues in Crime,
Your chutzpah is astonishing. You’ve studied the art of lying, and perfected it. Your trick: Just keep repeating the untruth with a straight face; never flinch or admit guilt.
Most of the country trusted you, back in 2019 - even as you had been poisoning our children for decades. Autism, asthma, ADHD, juvenile diabetes, and childhood cancer were rising crazily, but we didn’t make the connection. In fact, we ought to thank you for exposing yourselves with the covid vaccine, so we can now attempt to reclaim the health of the world’s children.
You apparently expected the party to last forever. Now you cry crocodile tears about the public’s lost trust in you - and manufacture the most ridiculous excuses.
As levels of trust in “public health experts” plummet lower than confidence in used-car salesmen, you blame the sinking uptake of your covid death shots - and your “childhood” shots, too - on everything BUT the real reasons: your own untrustworthy selves; your full-blown lies that brought death to so many, and the poisons you peddle and push.
It is important to unpack your newest lies for the world to see and laugh at. Let them be recorded for posterity.
Your forked tongues are many. Sometimes you feign cluelessness, pretending that covid vax refusal is all about some vague heebie-jeebie “feelings,” without facts or reason behind them. Like in this gem by Dr. Danielle Ofri:
Dr. Ofri just can’t understand why her mostly vaxxed patients would be refusing the newest boosters:
The response has been almost like clockwork, at nearly every medical visit in the past few weeks. “It’s time for the flu shot,” I’ll say to my patients, “plus the updated Covid vaccine.” And that’s when the groans start.
As I try to suss out what’s on my patients’ minds, I can feel their slight sense of surprise that there is no specific issue causing their discomfort about getting the updated Covid vaccine. It’s as though they have a communal case of the heebie-jeebies.
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/27/opinion/covid-vaccine-skepticism-doctor.html
It wouldn’t be that your patients’ survival instincts are actually kicking in, Dr. Ofri?
Maybe they’re finally catching on that the shots don’t work and that they’re killing lots of folks?
You also come up with the most wacky theories, like “racial inequality” - a favorite to hide your crimes.
In this rather insulting Times piece, you posited that people “whom the government has forgotten,” who live in dire poverty, end up concluding they’ve “got no one to rely on except themselves,” resulting in these communities becoming independent-minded in making medical choices. Did you consider that maybe they’re just less brainwashed?
You play the political game whenever you get the chance, painting vaccine hesitators as the hated Republicans, tarring them with the brush of anti-science, right-wing nut jobs. You bemoan the unfortunate divide that’s “costing lives” and wring your hands over the future of a country that has lost trust in its institutions:
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/10/03/opinion/science-americans-trust-covid.html
From the article by M. Anthony Mills:
Dr. Mandy Cohen has been on a national tour. The new director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, she aims to rebuild trust in that troubled agency at a moment when Covid-19 cases are rising again and the Biden administration has begun a new vaccine campaign.
She has her work cut out for her. According to new survey data, 69 percent of Americans this past May said they had confidence in scientists to act in the public’s best interest, compared with 86 percent of Americans who told the Pew Research Center in a similar survey that they had confidence in scientists in January 2019. Meanwhile, vaccine skepticism has become one of the most divisive political issues of our time.
How did we get here? Many see Americans’ anti-vaccine and anti-mask attitudes as only the latest expression of a longstanding science denialism prevalent among Republicans. This anti-science mentality, the argument goes, stems from an anti-government ideology that took root in the Republican Party during the 1980s and has matured into antipathy toward not just government but science as well. Basically, the populist skepticism unleashed by Donald Trump is the logical successor to Ronald Reagan’s small-government conservatism.
Yet Americans’ changing attitudes toward science in recent years reveal a rather different — more complex and, frankly, unsettling — picture.
It is not simply that Americans disagree about particular pandemic policies or that some distrust particular expert institutions. Instead, many Americans, especially but not only conservatives, have grown highly distrustful of institutions of all kinds, creating fertile soil for conspiracies and other extreme views to take root.
This, in turn, raises the disturbing prospect of a new politics polarized not so much around public policies but around trust itself — and the public figures who successfully mobilize trust or distrust. Restoring faith, therefore, may prove vital for a functioning society. To get there, experts must consider how and why so many Americans now consider them and the institutions they represent to be unworthy of their confidence.
You wonder, you liars, why we consider you unworthy of our confidence? Don’t waste your time on polls and studies. The reason is utterly simple. It’s because you LIE, and kids DIE. And that’s why we don’t trust you anymore, because we know.
But of course, you just go on lying and pretending to wonder. You will never, ever say that you approved and pushed shots for babies that never should have seen the light of day for anyone.
You don’t even mind admitting to “mistakes in communication” - like Offit’s “we needed to have better messaging.” But you won’t say the simple truth - that your products are deadly.
Dr. Paul Offit, vaccine inventor and member of the FDA’s vaccine advisory committee, bears responsibility for untold numbers of vaccine injuries and deaths - and now, Offit, you join the bandwagon pretending to try to figure out why the public has lost trust in the CDC and FDA, in your newly published book, “Tell Me When It’s Over.” All you need to do is to look in the mirror.
In your February 5 substack, “Do Infants and Young Children Need a COVID Vaccine?” you urge COVID-19 shots for babies as young as 6 months. You are unhappy that only 4% of parents with children younger than age 4 have injected their kids with COVID-19 shots. And you really think the distrust is all because of “communication errors?”
Quotable quotes from Dr. Offit’s February 12 substack promoting his book:
We made a few communications errors. For example, although it was a remarkable scientific achievement, the phrase “Operation Warp Speed” worried people that corners had been cut or, worse, that vaccine safety guidelines had been ignored. Also, the CDC’s use of the term “breakthrough” to describe mild or asymptomatic infections set an unrealistic expectation of what these vaccines could and couldn’t do. Most Americans are still confused about what it means to be fully protected against this virus.
When COVID vaccines were first made available, people rushed to get them. By May 2021, about 70 percent of the U.S. population had been vaccinated. Then we hit a wall. Many people simply refused to be vaccinated, arguing that COVID wasn’t that bad, or that the vaccines were too risky. I wrote this book in attempt to understand how this happened. Why did anti-vaccine activism swing so wildly to the right? Why, for some, did “vaccines” become a dirty word?
Epic comments from readers on the stack:
My favorite:
OMG Dr. Offit -- you didn't need a whole book to try to explain what happened....it's really quite simple to explain why anti-vaccine activism soared: Many people experienced directly or saw in others just how REAL, how frequent and how terrible vaccine injury is....though the more one's livelihood is privileged by pharma -- the harder it is for them to overcome their brainwashing to recognize the truth of what happened right before their eyes. Stanley Milgram's work is more insightful to all this than yours is.
We don't need you to now "spin" what happened to keep the sinking boat afloat any longer. What we need is for you to open your heart, mind and eyes to the egregious harm you and your peers have facilitated and now spend the rest of your life, trying to undo it.
And:
This author is a serial liar who recommended and continues to recommend you inject yourself with a poison that has proven to not stop you from getting Covid-19, doesn’t stop you from transmitting Covid-19, doesn’t reduce your risk of hospitalization or death - in fact it increases both risks. A poison that has killed between 13-17 million people worldwide, which is 2 times the number killed by the disease itself - and most of those deaths were caused by the treatment given in the hospitals. So no one wants to read your lies and distortions of reality.
This one sums it up:
… it is exactly you and other bought and paid for mouthpieces that lead us exactly to where we are now.
Offit, Mandy, Fauci, NYT, and all of you… you don’t even know HOW to string a truthful sentence together even if you tried!
This email newsletter from Times author David Leonhardt, writing on February 13 in “The C.D.C., ignored,” is a winner. David theorizes that US officials were too strict in their recommendations, so they turned parents off:
The C.D.C., ignored
Much of the world has decided that most young children do not need to receive Covid booster shots. It’s true in Britain, France, Japan and Australia.
Some countries, like India, have gone further. They say that otherwise healthy children do not need even an initial Covid vaccination. In Germany, public health experts don’t recommend vaccines for any children, including teenagers, unless they have a medical condition.
Scientists in these countries understand that Covid vaccines are highly effective. But the experts have concluded that the benefits for children often fail to outweigh the costs.
The benefits are modest because children are extremely unlikely to become seriously ill from Covid and are less likely to transmit the virus than an adult is. The costs include the financial price of mass vaccination, the possibility that a shot’s side effects will make a child sick enough to miss school, the tiny chance of more serious side effects and the inherent uncertainty about long-term effects.
The U.S. — as American readers have probably realized by this point in the newsletter — is a global outlier. The C.D.C. urges booster shots for all children six months and older.
Yet the recommendation has failed to accomplish much. Instead, most American parents have chosen to overrule the C.D.C. Only about 40 percent of children under 12 have been vaccinated against Covid, and only about 5 percent are up to date on their boosters.
This situation makes for a case study of the shortcomings in U.S. Covid policy: A strict approach to a nuanced issue has backfired, fostering skepticism of scientific expertise while doing little to improve public health. Dr. Francis Collins, the retired head of the National Institutes of Health, acknowledged the larger problem last year when he said that experts erred during the pandemic by taking a “very narrow view of what the right decision is.”
Monthslong school closures that harmed student learning were one example. Extended mask mandates that many people ignored were another. A continuing C.D.C. recommendation that conflicts with international practice — and that most Americans have dismissed — has become yet another.
No admission of guilt. Just that “a strict approach to a nuanced issue has backfired, fostering skepticism of scientific expertise.”
Parents TRUSTED YOU. They relied on you for their kids LIVES!!! But you wouldn’t tell the truth. You should have been reassuring the country back in 2020 and 2021 with the easily observable reality the you (the Times) finally acknowledged now: “…. children are extremely unlikely to become seriously ill from Covid and are less likely to transmit the virus than an adult is.”
Instead, you sowed fear and panic. You created such hysteria that many parents bought into it and jabbed the most precious people in their lives - their healthy children - with a product that was still in trials and had already killed so many. It’s mind-boggling what a profound influence you exerted on the public, working in tandem - health agencies, media, and doctors.
You killed and disabled their children. And it’s not just the covid vaccines. It’s the others, too, that have been hurting kids so badly for many, many years, resulting in a generation overflowing with chronic illness.
You won’t EVER admit that YOU are the problem. You continue to cry about the population’s loss of trust in you, and you scheme grand schemes to regain it - EVEN as you continue to push more deadly injections. For example, now it’s RSV.
Children’s Health Defense reported on the 32 RSV vaccine deaths already on the VAERS site just 10 months into the RSV shots - but as is your custom, you deny all responsibility.
34 Deaths, 302 Serious Injuries: RSV Vaccines Aren’t Even a Year Old but Some Experts Say It’s Time to Pull Them From the Market
Newly approved vaccines for respiratory syncytial virus have been linked to deaths and serious injuries and, most recently, to Guillain-Barré syndrome, but U.S. health officials continue to recommend them as “safe and effective.”
By Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D. 03/05/24
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/rsv-vaccines-deaths-serious-injuries/
It’s been less than a year since the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommended two new respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccines — yet CDC data and the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System(VAERS) already show reports of 34 deaths, 302 serious adverse events and according to news reports this week, a safety signal for Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS).
Members of the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) presented the data on deaths and adverse events related to the RSV vaccines at a Feb. 29 meeting.
Yet, ACIP — and news media reports — primarily focused on GBS safety signals, glossing over deaths and the administration of the vaccines to unauthorized age groups.
Instead, CDC officials claimed it’s too early to determine if the RSV vaccines caused the adverse events and reiterated that the shots are safe, according to The Associated Press (AP).
CDC creating ‘illusion of safe and effective’
According to the CDC data presented at the Feb. 29 ACIP meeting, of the 34 deaths reported as of Feb. 16 following RSV vaccination, 22 were linked to Arexvy and nine to Abrysvo. In three instances, the report listed “no brand name.”
Yet, discrepancies in the data are evident, as the public-facing VAERS database indicates only 29 RSV vaccine-related deaths as of Feb. 23. And according to Albert Benavides, founder of VAERSAware.com, three more “hidden” deaths reported after RSV vaccines are listed in VAERS, but the vaccine name is unlabeled.
Benavides, who identified discrepancies and contradictions in VAERS data and has called attention to the existence of two parallel VAERS databases — one that is public-facing and one that is not — said, “It is simply gross and despicable the CDC and FDA are allowed to pass off this data obfuscation as pharmacovigilance.”
He added: “VAERS administration is simply not publishing all legitimate reports received.”
One of the deaths recorded in VAERS involved a 27-day-old baby from New York — even though the RSV vaccines are not approved for children. According to the report, which was entered into the VAERS database on Jan. 8, the newborn was vaccinated at a doctor’s office “and he passed away right there.” The date of death was unspecified.
Other RSV vaccine-related death reports included:
A report involving a foreign woman of “unknown” age but who was pregnant. She received Abrysvo Dec. 27, 2023, and died Jan. 1, 2024.
A 67-year-old New Jersey man who received Arexvy Oct. 14, 2023, and died two days later — a death acknowledged by GSK as “related to Arexvy.”
A 69-year-old Florida man who received Arexvy concurrently with the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine Sept. 28, 2023, and died two days later. According to the VAERS report, an EKG on the date of his death was “grossly ‘abnormal’” despite no known cardiac history and an “unremarkable” cardiac exam two months prior.
A 70-year-old California man who received Arexvy concurrently with a flu vaccine on Sept. 5, 2023. Increased coughing and fever began “less than 24 hours later” and lasted for four days, until “the patient was found deceased at home.”
A 73-year-old Virginia male who received Arexvy Jan. 24 and was diagnosed with GBS. Symptoms began 11 days after vaccination. He died Feb. 15.
A 75-year-old Virginia woman who received Arexvy Jan. 4, died two hours later.
A 76-year-old Michigan man who received Arexvy Jan. 11, sustained tachycardia and difficulty breathing, and died of acute sepsis and pneumonia Jan. 15.
A 77-year-old Pennsylvania man who received Arexvy Jan. 4 and soon experienced “seizure-like activity” despite no history of seizures. He died Jan. 6.
An 81-year-old California man who received Arexvy and a flu vaccine Sept. 18, 2023. He sustained severe cardiopulmonary arrest and died five hours later.
An 81-year-old New Mexico woman who received Arexvy concurrently with the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine, and pneumonia, adenovirus and flu vaccines, on Oct. 19, 2023. On Oct. 29, 2023, she sustained a hemorrhage and later died.
An 85-year-old Colorado man who received Abrysvo and a flu vaccine on Sept. 11, 2023. Two days later, he “developed symptoms of shingles in his eye” and later “developed meningitis/encephalitis that led to a host of other complications that ultimately led to his death” on Dec. 21, 2023.
According to Benavides, other deaths likely related to RSV vaccination are “hidden” within VAERS, with details such as the vaccine name listed as “unknown” in some reports.
This includes the Jan. 8 death of a preterm newborn in Texas. According to VAERS, the baby was “not breathing” hours after vaccination and subsequently died. The vaccine lot number listed in the VAERS report corresponds with Abrysvo.
Benavides said mislabeled reports hide the true extent of adverse events:
“Not publishing legitimate reports is one of their Vegas tricks. They delete legitimate reports after publication, purposely delay published reports, allow reports to be published without critical data fields like age, date of vaccination or death, even when reports are properly documented in the summary narrative.
“It’s not a stretch to believe VAERS administration is systematically and actively scrubbing data fields that were present on initial submission to create the illusion of ‘safe and effective.’”
Two other RSV vaccine-related reports in VAERS list Beyfortus — a monoclonal antibody for RSV administered to babies — in the write-up.
These reports include a male born prematurely in New York who received Beyfortus and the hepatitis B vaccine at birth, and died of “fluid buildup in the lungs.” Another report lists an Arkansas male of “unknown” age who died of cardiac arrest on Feb. 14, although this was deemed unrelated to the “Beyfortus vaccine received” the prior day.
Although Beyfortus is not a vaccine, it is classified as such in some instances. The ACIP recommended adding Beyfortus to the childhood vaccine schedule — giving it a liability waiver — but excluding it from the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP).
Bring back informed consent. Then when they say "Would you like this toxic nanoparticle bioweapon with SV40 cancer promoter, toxic spike proteins, lethal prions, lethal endotoxins, toxic PEG, toxic Polysorbate 80, and plasmid DNA which will integrate into your genome causing cancer and be passed to your kids?" we would have all refused.
This has been a long time coming. When I retired almost 20 years ago, it wasn't nearly this bad but there were signs. But once you step away, if you want to, you can see the depth of the allopathic medical establishment corruption and how they are owned by big pharma. My mentors must be turning in their graves.