Cancer Resulting From Covid Vaccines: Causal Mechanisms, Case Studies, Doctors’ Reports - and NIH Coverup
We can only help people heal if we understand WHY they are sick. If the covid shots are causing cancer, then detoxing from the shots is the critical key to cancer prevention and treatment.
BS”D
Why would the covid vaccines cause cancer?
Early on - before the rise in cancers was noted - scientists warned that the covid vaccines were likely to cause cancer, for multiple reasons.
Dr. Ryan Cole MD, pathologist, was one of the very first doctors to report the large jump in cancers he was witnessing within months after the vaccine rollout.
Dr. Cole presented a talk on the topic of the shots’ carcinogenicity last week at the European Parliament, and reported that the cancer rate is “off the charts” now.
His short and powerful speech can be viewed on this link starting at about 6:23. https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/events/fluoride-report-or-systematic-review-of-the-science-or-may-4-or-12-30pm-et/fluoride-report-systematic-review-of-the-science-may-4/
Here is a slide Dr. Cole showed, illustrating numerous cancer causing mechanisms of the vaccines:
I’ll elaborate on just six mechanisms:
• Insertional mutagenesis, (changing the instructions inside our DNA) which could result in cancer, is an intrinsic risk of any DNA based therapy. (A large amount of DNA has been found in the supposedly mRNA vaccines. Additionally, mRNA can become DNA through a process called reverse transcription.) 1
• The spike protein itself has toxicity and can interfere with the repair mechanisms of DNA. (DNA can become damaged for various reasons, which can lead to cancer - but we have remarkable repair mechanisms in our bodies which can detect and repair the damaged DNA. One of these repair mechanisms, for example, is the BRCA gene. The spike protein can interfere with these repair mechanisms.)
• The spike protein binds to and interferes with p53,2 considered the “guardian of the genome.” This increases manifold the risk of p53 mediated cancers - lymphoma and breast, ovarian, and pancreatic cancers. (See much more on this critical point in the addendum.)
• The lipid nanoparticles themselves (see picture above and articles in footnote) contain highly toxic substances which are likely carcinogenic,3 and to make things even worse, the lipid nanoparticles are so tiny that they “get through the cracks” and are bringing the toxins into places in the body that they could never otherwise reach - for example, into the ovaries, and past the blood-brain barrier.4 The lipid nanoparticles are also highly inflammatory,5 and inflammation in the body can trigger development of cancer (as well as blocked arteries, diabetes, and a host of other illnesses.) By inflaming the ovaries, the lipid nanoparticles not only disrupt normal hormonal production, causing menstrual disorders, but could thereby trigger hormone-mediated cancers.
Dr. Cole wrote to me:
There are so many mechanisms induced by the chronic presence of vaccine spike. I think T cell suppression is one of the most critical, as our natural killer cells help keep cancer in check. Suppressed interferon type 1 is also a way the spike allows cancers to grow more quickly.
In other words:
• The long-term spike protein production in the body as a result of vaccination causes suppression of T cells. T cells are part of our body’s natural immune system, which destroy the cancerous cells that we always have floating around in our body, before they can create problems.6
• The chronic presence of the spike protein suppresses the body’s production of interferon type 1. Interferon is very important in keeping cancer cells in check.7
Please see the footnotes, containing links to multiple studies, at the end of the article.
All the studies that were NOT done
The manufacturers clearly state that genotoxicity and carcinogenicity studies - which are standard requirements for any new medical treatments - were not done. As you can easily understand from the above list of risks, these tests should have been performed before even one human trial subject was injected. The covid shots should have taken many, many years to test for safety - and this step was clearly skipped.
In fact, as gene therapies, which the covid vaccines are, extra testing should have been done, (as is normally required for gene therapies) and the results made publicly available, but this did not happen. The FDA specifically excluded these injections from the normal procedures required for gene therapies.
Additionally, special monitoring would normally be required to be performed by the manufacturers now, AFTER the rollout of these gene therapies, to check for increased cancer - and this is obviously not going on (or at least, not being reported.)
What are we seeing now?
In December 2022, Dr. David Wiseman discovered that on VAERS, there had been 50% more reports of cancer following covid vaccination in the two years since the rollout - than following all the other vaccines for all the years combined, since the reporting system began in 1990.
Many doctors are reporting that they are now seeing many strange and aggressive new cancers, which are occurring in patients younger than usual, as well as a large spike in cancer diagnoses, and reactivations of cancers which had been in remission.
Case Studies and Doctors’ Reports
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9377515/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8656165/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33974494/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9377515/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36166359/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36166359/ https://europepmc.org/article/pmc/pmc9114986 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36676781/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34901098/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34628691/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34702598/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35979213/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35966352/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35865440/
Many more here: https://react19.org/1250-covid-vaccine-reports/
Canadian Dr. William Makis MD has documented the surge in “turbo cancers” in young people:
In January 2023, British oncologist Dr. Angus Dalgliesh - who has 40 years of experience in his field - spoke up about what he is seeing. Please watch this 2 minute clip:
Dr. Angus Dalgleish is a consultant oncologist, a Professor of Oncology, and an expert in immunology.
Transcript of Dr. Dalgleish’s above talk:
I’m Angus Dalgleish. I’m a Professor of Oncology at St. George’s, a Consultant Medical Oncologist, and I have started to notice that several of my patients have melanoma who’ve been stable with stage 4 disease, they’ve had very good immunotherapy or other treatment and I’ve been reviewing them from five to 20 years. I’ve noticed that I have now over six, possibly seven, even an eighth yesterday, who’ve clearly relapsed following the booster vaccine.
At first we didn’t put the two together, but when a patient said, “I felt awful since the vaccine, I’ve just been drained”, they’ve described symptoms like a Long Covid, and the next thing we know, two, three weeks, couple of months later they’ve got clear evidence of relapse. And these relapses are quite aggressive. They’re not a gentle relapse. They’re relapses that are requiring systemic therapy as opposed to a little nodule that requires surgical excision.
But it’s not just this. I’m now very much aware in my own circle of many people, they haven’t got a melanoma – they’ve never had anything before – but they’ve got lumps and bumps and they’re not felling well. And two people I’ve interviewed at great length, they all put it down to feeling awful after their booster. They were fine with the first two vaccines, they just had shivers, flu etc. But they’ve described being very tired, very fatigued, wanting to stay in bed, and this has dragged on to the point were they’ve gone to the doctor and they’ve had blood counts and investigations and I now know seven of them, two of them have leukemias, and others have lymphomas, and one of them has a very bad myeloma, which he is absolutely sure was instigated by the booster as he developed the dreadful symptoms.
Last August, Attorney Jeff Childers wrote:
EthicalSkeptic, one of team reality’s most important independent analysts during the pandemic, reported yesterday that the CDC’s weekly deaths report shows cancer deaths flying off the charts. He pulls figures from the CDC’s MMWR — the Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report — and graphs them.
Below is the graph of cancer deaths from 2014 through 2022 week 30. As you can see, the chart shows where the deaths basically leap up in a straight line — something that’s never happened during the previous years — on MMWR week 14, 2021. Coincidentally, that week was also the rollout of vaccines to all age groups. As you can also see from the chart, cancer deaths are still rocketing up as of the latest figures (2022 week 30).
It’s not just one data point. There are TONS of anecdotal reports from healthcare workers — doctors and nurses all over the country — reporting unprecedented levels of new cancer diagnoses as well as sudden renewals of old cancers. I would say the MMWR numbers corroborate the anecdotal reports.
Nobody is reporting the opposite, that cancer rates are down. Nobody’s even saying cancer rates are flat. They just aren’t saying.
Etana Hecht reported last August:
Dr. Ute Kruger is a researcher and senior physician at Lunds University in Sweden. She’s the former Chief of Pathology, a field that she’s worked in for the last 25 years, with a specialty in breast cancer diagnosis for the past 18 years. She’s studied thousands of autopsies and breast cancer samples. She’s extremely familiar with the industry and patient age, tumor size, and malignancy grade are all within her field of expertise and have had a natural rhythm throughout her career. That natural rhythm came to a halt in 2021 once the vaccine rollout began.
Doctors for Covid Ethics posted an interview with her where she shared her concerns about unusual features that have been showing up in samples from the past year.
Age - The average ages of the samples she received dropped, with a rise in the number of samples from people in their 30’s-50’s.
Size - It used to be unusual for Dr. Kruger to find a tumor 3 cm in size. In this new environment, she’s regularly seeing tumors of 4 cm, 8 cm, 10 cm, and the occasional 12 cm. In a shocking anecdote, 2 weeks ago she found a 16 cm tumor that took up an entire breast.
Multiple Tumors - Dr. Kruger has begun to see more cases of multiple tumors growing in the same patient, sometimes even in both breasts. She had 3 cases within 3 weeks of patients who had tumors growing in multiple organs. One had tumors in his/her breast, pancreas and lungs within months of getting vaccinated.
Recurrence - There has been an uptick in patients who have been in remission from their cancer for many years, suddenly getting an aggressive recurrence of their cancer shortly after vaccination.
Dr. Kruger initially thought that these turbo cancers, as she calls them, were due to delayed doctor appointments from Covid lockdowns, but that period is long over, and the tumors are still growing aggressively, and in younger patients. She reported some of these cases to the FDA, and while some higher-ups initially agreed to meet with her, they canceled the meeting with no explanation the next day and sent a phone agent to take her report instead.
Six months ago Dr. Kruger appeared at a panel in Germany to present her theory that vaccination is causing aggressive tumors, and she asked for help from the doctors at that summit in collecting data. Unfortunately, few of them have been willing to collect that data and share it with her.
Here is Canadian Dr. Charles Hoffe MD speaking out about turbo cancers. He says that while previously there was a small percentage of cases where a patient was already Stage 4 at the time of diagnosis, now approximately two-thirds of the cancer cases he’s getting in his family practice are already Stage 4 at diagnosis. (Link below.)
https://rumble.com/v1uyx0w-dr.-charles-hoffe-on-turbo-cancers-after-covid-vaccination.html
Here is testimony from a nurse in the trenches, (herself injured by the shots), whom Dr. Pierre Kory quoted on his substack. This account of an explosion in cancer (and clots, heart attacks, strokes…) is already a year old. I highlighted the cancer parts.
I lost my Hematologist-Oncologist doctor to vaccine injury - he is out and never to practice again - in his early 40s. He was a "true believer" and in denial until it was him who was the injured patient. Our cancer hospital - know most of the case managers and many doctors since they were residents. They now have case loads in the 1000s rather than 250-400 over any given quarter. Not enough bed or infusion space for the cancer patients as outpatients. Radiation treatment backlog. All at a huge cancer hospital monstrosity itself. All kinds - brain, lymph, stomach, pancreas, blood, AND EYE CANCERS - orbital especially in younger people recently vaxxed. Microvascular ischemia on rise in vaxxed younger people. Strokes way up in no-risk, no co-morbidities, young to younger-ish.
In my current position, I read many charts and see in depth info - so much boosting and reboosting and not following other protocols - it's a given now that the explosions in diagnosis of the cancers and cardiac issues especially come from these decisions. In some cases, the first thing you see on a chart is huge letters stating VAXXED alongside the pt's diagnosis, treatments thus far, which is usually at odds with normal disease course, age and projected outcome, etc. They're pushing the vax status, in bright letters, to the top of the list so it can be considered - not for every patient, but the "challenging cases" ... That may be for research purposes.
Lost quite a few coworkers to either VAX injury itself - took them out of the work force, OR they resigned/accepted firing or retired once mandates were settled. It's the phone calls I have with my cohorts in the other areas of the system. The real story is in those conversations. The doctors now admitting to injury is growing, but they can't tell their patients why they are no longer practicing. Losing specialists is big problem not easily solved.
It makes me just stop, and by end of the week, take into account cases of say, ocular orbital cancer in 20-somethings. Have had 6 in last 2 weeks with no Family History or other indicators. Out of the blue, some with brain mets now. All vaxxed unwillingly, all had Covid and recovered fine prior to employer forced vax. The actuaries are correct. Excess mortality, let along whatever-life-left disability. Stunning numbers.
There’s much more in Dr. Kory’s articles:
And: OB/GYN Dr. Dan McDyer on the Irregular Bleeding & Cancers He Is Seeing in His Practice Since 2021:
Mexican FOIA data shows a shocking breast cancer explosion in 2021. There is a 518% increase in breast cancer in young girls aged 10-14, (not a typo!) and a 3,249% increase in breast cancer in young women aged 20-24, etc.
I published these texts from friends in November:
..I heard from another friend that his neighbor’s father in his 70’s just found out he has stage 4 cancer with no symptoms, he went to the doctor to discuss treatment options, came home and dropped dead.
And:
Went to a funeral today, for my cousin
Thats my fourth family member to die from vax related stuff
And another four have cancer currently or just finished treatment
All high 60s -early 70's
It's wiping them out
(Yes, she said they all got the shots.)
People I know who serve in various positions helping patients continue to tell me about the nonstop tragedies they are seeing - an explosion of cancer, often advanced, in young and middle aged people, such as they’ve never experienced before.
The common denominator is, almost always, the covid vaccine.
For example, I now texted a hospital doctor whom I had interviewed last summer. He works in the ER and on the medical floor.
This was his immediate response about what’s going on:
The most important takeaway message? If you’ve had the shot, please detox!
I want to stress to cancer patients: You need to detox from these toxins in order to have the best shot at beating your cancer!
And to people who are currently feeling fine, please detox now, before medical problems (G-d forbid) arise.
A detox would seem to me to also be very prudent for unvaccinated people who were exposed to shedding.
For a simple detox protocol, please email LevAharonBikurCholim@gmail.com.
Please also see the cancer treatment articles on my site (there are six so far.) Here is the most recent:
Addendum: Did they know the shots would cause cancer when they promoted them?
Investigative Journalists John Davidson from Broken Truth, and Emerald Robinson have investigated what appears to be a massive NIH coverup.
John Davidson interviews Ann Vandersteel here:
https://brokentruth.com/ann-vandersteel-researches-nihgate/
Emerald Robinson wrote on April 24: Did The NIH Just Get Caught Hiding The Link Between COVID Vaccines & Cancer?
Links between the clot shots and p53 mediated cancer (pancreas, lymphoma, ovary, breast) are being suppressed.
If you know someone who took the clot shots and has now developed a p53 mediated cancer (pancreas, lymphoma, ovary, breast) then this article is for them.
Dr. Ah Kahn Syed has written a stunning article on Substack which claims that two well-known scientists working for the NIH and Big Pharma actually got a research article removed from publication because it showed a link between the mRNA vaccines and breast cancer as well as ovarian cancer.
Eric Freed of the NIH (an agency which apparently owns patents to Moderna products) allegedly suppressed a very important paper showing that the mRNA vaccines were carcinogenic.
So concerned researchers and scientists filed a FOI for Eric Freed’s emails. The NIH has the emails, but is refusing to release them.
There are 490 pages of records that the NIH doesn’t want anyone to read.
Part of Dr. Ah Kahn Syed’s July 30, 2022 article:
TLDR: A paper was published in October showing how the mRNA vaccines could massively impact ovarian and breast cancer risk. Two scientists linked to the NIH and Pharma conspired to remove it from publication - putting a generation of women at risk. “… a generation of women exposed to the SARS-CoV2 spike protein could be at significant risk of ovarian & breast cancer.”
… if there was a novel therapeutic that interfered with the body’s cells’ ability to produce p53 and make the BRCA pathway work defending our genome - you would think that would be important, wouldn’t you?
Let me introduce a paper on exactly this subject catchily entitled “SARS–CoV–2 Spike Impairs DNA Damage Repair and Inhibits V(D)J Recombination In Vitro” (otherwise known as the Jiang study after the authors Hui Jiang and Ya-Fang Mei). On the face of it, the study is nothing to do with ovarian cancer or breast cancer, it’s about lymphocytes.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34696485/
(BW: Above is the article that was retracted, that should not have been.)
VDJ recombination is .. the mechanism behind the body’s creation of immunity. It’s how T- and B- cells magically create new proteins to neutralise nasty bugs.
It also has something really important in common with our ovarian cancer pathway, in that it relies on DNA strand breakage and repair - it’s essential to the process, and it’s the same process seen in p53-dependent ovarian and breast cancer.
So when Jiang and Mei designed an experiment to look at the possibility that the SARS-CoV-2 proteins might impact this pathway in lymphocytes they were doing an experiment that was of vital importance to world’s population.
What did they find? Well, unfortunately something really important. That is, of all the proteins produced by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, one of them - the spike protein - obliterated the DNA repair mechanism in lymphocytes. . Here is the graph from the paper showing the level of “HR efficiency” (i.e. homologous repair efficiency, i.e. the ability of the cell to repair DNA) seen with the different proteins of the virus. The spike protein was so toxic to this pathway that it knocked 90% of it out. This is an environment that is almost guaranteed to cause cancer.
Much more of the background science in Dr. Kahn’s original article:
May G-d have mercy on His world.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7074910/
https://acuitastx.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Acuitas-website-deck-Aug_6_2020-2.pdf
https://acuitastx.com/technology/lipid-nanoparticles/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8032477/
In May 2021, I wrote the following in an early edition of my book Look Before You Leap, but soon afterwards, Cayman Chemical took down the danger warning information I had referenced from their site:
https://www.hackensackmeridianhealth.org/HealthU/2021/01/11/a-simple-breakdown-of- the-ingredients-in-the-covid-vaccines/
“One component of the lipid nanoparticle in the vaccine is SM-102, (made by Cayman Chemical Co.), an EXTREMELY hazardous substance, not intended for human or animal use. It has a GHS06 Skull and crossbones classification (Acute Tox. 2, H310 Fatal in contact with skin), GHS08 Health Hazard classification (Carc. 2, H351, Suspected of causing cancer, Repr. 2, H361, Suspected of damaging fertility or the unborn child, STOT RE 1, H372 Causes damage to the central nervous system, the kidneys, the liver and the respiratory system through prolonged or repeated exposure, and MORE. Take a look yourself – search “what is SM-102” and the first thing that comes up is Cayman Chemical. Click to go to their site and then download safety data.”
Excerpt: tinyurl.com/LNPbiodistributionStudy
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0168365912000892
https://www.verywellhealth.com/t-cells-2252171
https://rupress.org/jem/article/220/2/e20220906/213689/SARS-CoV-2-Spike-protein-suppresses-CTL-mediated https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7136698/ https://biosignaling.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12964-022-00856-w https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.02.09.527892v1.full
Thank you for this amazing summary!
Well done, Brucha.
The jab cripples innate and adaptive immunity. This is one result.