Part 4: Scientism: The Rise of a Deadly New Religion- With No Questions Allowed!

Weigh the evidence for yourself. You don’t need to be an “expert” to understand that something is terribly wrong here. Will people wake up?

BS”D

For Parts 1-3:

In Parts 4 and 5, I would like to bring you some truly shocking examples of crystal-clear lies and fraud by those who had been entrusted with the health of the American people.

Remember, of course, that the CDC, FDA, and Anthony Fauci - the High Priests of Scientism, whom we are not allowed to question - consistently told us that lockdowns were necessary, masks worked, social distancing was a must, and the vaccines were safe and effective. That was the sacred science.

Well, as many of us “infidels” suspected, everything about that sacred, unquestionable science was just plain fake.

Fauci testimony: Social Distancing “sort of just appeared”

In January, Fauci testified at a closed-door interview with the House Select Committee on Coronavirus Pandemic. Fox News reported that Fauci admitted in his testimony that social distancing was not based on science, and ‘sort of just appeared.’

Remember that hundreds of millions of lives in this country were turned upside down by social distancing requirements. Children lost not only chunks of their schooling and development - some even lost their very lives, as they committed suicide or died from overdose due to the social isolation and anxiety. But now we hear that all of it was not based on science and just sort of appeared.

https://www.foxnews.com/health/fauci-admits-social-distancing-not-based-science-sort-just-appeared

In fact, during the interview, Fauci was extremely evasive and over one hundred times said “I don’t know” or “I don’t recall” when questioned on pandemic-era policies, etc.

https://www.nationalreview.com/news/fauci-said-he-could-not-recall-specifics-on-covid-origins-pandemic-era-policies-over-100-times-in-closed-door-testimony/

Why did “science” claim the vaccines stopped covid transmission when that was never even tested?

What about the vaccines? Surely, if people were being forced to get jabbed or lose their jobs, there must have been solid evidence that the shots prevented covid transmission from person to person - otherwise, what would be the benefit of a vaccine mandate? The premise was that you were protecting others by “stopping the spread.”

Turns out, everything was a big game of pretend. In October 2022, Pfizer’s president of international developed markets, Janine Small, under intense questioning by Rob Roos, admitted in her testimony before the EU Parliament that Pfizer did not even test whether the vaccine prevented covid transmission. They had to move “at the speed of science” (her words) to get the shots out, so there wasn’t time to check whether they worked.

Testimony here: https://www.bitchute.com/video/TXX0acEIUPcc/

The explosive V-safe data proves the CDC knew the shots were a killer from Day 1

If the covid vaccines didn’t actually work to stop the spread, surely at least their High Priests knew for a fact that they were safe, as they just about forced them on every man, woman, and child? What would it mean for the religion of Scientism if it would be known that their leaders, in fact, knowingly pushed death while pretending to safeguard life?

But indeed that is what happened.

For too long, the data on rates of injury among those who got vaccinated - which should have been given to the public immediately - was kept secret by the government and Pfizer. Attorney Aaron Siri fought tirelessly in court to make the data available.

Thanks to Aaron Siri and other brave warriors, we know with certainty that the CDC was absolutely aware from the very beginning of the horrible harms coming to people from vaccination - even as they continued promoting the vaccines with a vengeance and claiming that the shots were absolutely safe, even for pregnant women.

This particular expose focuses on the data from the V-Safe monitoring system.

There are actually quite a number of systems tracking the vaccine injuries, but the V-Safe system provides the ratio of injuries per number of vaccines administered, so it is uniquely valuable. It’s easy to see why the Scientism Priests fought so long and hard to keep the V-Safe data secret.

From Aaron Siri’s substack articles, Part 10 and Part 4:

Part 10:

As many of you know, in our prior case, we obtained the V-safe check-the-box data and, and now through this case, the V-safe free-text data will also be made available to the public. Why would CDC want to conceal the free-text entries from the public? Just check out one example of a free-text entry we did obtain and the answer may become plain, as covered in my prior post “CDC Designs V-Safe to Assure Harms Are Hidden in Free-Text Fields…”

From Part 4:

Unlike VAERS, the data in v-safe is gathered from a known and quantifiable universe of individuals. In fact, v-safe has precisely 10,108,273 registered users as of August 2022. These users are asked to answer the same questions. By aggregating answers to identical questions in v-safe, the rate of an adverse reaction can be calculated. That is not possible with VAERS.

For example, of the 10,108,273 registered v-safe users, 782,913 reported needing medical care after vaccination.  So, you divide 782,913 by 10,108,273 and, poof, you now know that 7.7% of all registered v-safe users sought medical care at least once following vaccination.

While the CDC avoided being able to easily calculate a rate of harm by not using check-the-box fields for adverse events of special interests, the hope would be that it at least timely followed up with v-safe users reporting serious harms in the free-text fields to learn more about their injuries. This way it can assess what harms the vaccine was causing and quickly address those harms. After all, the CDC claimed v-safe is a “real time” surveillance system for Covid-19 vaccines “so scientists can quickly study them and determine if there is a safety concern with a particular vaccine.”

Well, the story of one Ph.D. who got vaccinated early to set an example and to encourage her students to do the same reflects otherwise.

Despite clearly reporting a significant medically attended health impact numerous times — which included brain swelling, toxic reaction, abnormal heart rhythm, numbness and tingling, high fever, chest pain, joint pain, light sensitivity, dizziness, impaired balance, nausea, vomiting, and lethargy — and begging for someone to help her in her v-safe reports, and trying to call v-safe herself, the CDC did not call her until over 200 days after she reported her serious injury!    

Here, for example, is what she submitted to v-safe just a couple of weeks after her vaccination, which included the plea “Help me!”:

Her pleas for help continued with every health check-in over the next few months which detailed serious and worsening medical condition from the vaccine and still no follow-up from the CDC. See her 6-month check-in below where she notes “still no response from CDC”:

When the CDC did finally call her over 200 days after pleading for help, the CDC’s first question was to ask the date she recovered. She explained she did not recover, was still on full disability, still not cleared to drive, still not cleared to walk more than a limited number of steps per day, etc. It was clear the CDC representative had not even read her v-safe reports and had no interest in actually assessing what had happened to this Ph.D. that was initially strongly advocating everyone get the shot! 

Makes one wonder how long people who reported “just” being hospitalized or seeking emergency room treatment, without any pleas for help or descriptions of symptoms and medical testing, needed to wait to get a call from the CDC. And it is also clear that when a call finally arrived, it was not about improving safety of these products.

So much for the CDC’s “real time” surveillance “so scientists can quickly study them and determine if there is a safety concern with a particular vaccine.”

Back to Aaron Siri’s Part 10, last month:

I am pleased to share that United States District Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk has issued a decision and order requiring CDC to release the 7.8 million free-text entries from CDC’s COVID-19 V-Safe program to the public. These are entries sent to CDC from roughly 10 million V-safe users, typically detailing injuries following receipt of a COVID-19 vaccine.

Here are excerpts from the incredible decision, which you can read in full here:

As COVID-19 spread, the federal government collaborated and cooperated with foreign governments and non-governmental humanitarian organizations, private companies, and the media to enable and incentivize widespread vaccination.…

The government promoted vaccination — directly through mandates or indirectly through policies, privileges, and messaging campaigns.  Many employers required vaccination via various workplace rules, regulations, and policies. … Societal reality hinged on vaccination status — from school attendance to family vacations. By early 2023, more than 5.5 billion people (about 72.3 percent of the world population) had received a dose of a COVID-19 vaccine, including more than 270 million Americans. Defendants have consistently asserted that “COVID-19 vaccines are safe and effective,” “recommends everyone ages 6 months and older get an updated COVID-19 vaccine,” and added the COVID-19 vaccine to standard Child and Adolescent Immunization Schedule. …

While “Trust the Science” became something of a national slogan, the American public’s trust in science and scientists are at an all-time low.

V-safe protocol intended that “[a] final data set . . . with deidentified data will be made available for external data requests or through Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests.” V-Safe Protocol: April 18, 2022 ... However, Defendants now argue … “... the V-safe application collected considerably more data and was operational for a longer period than initially anticipated.” … The simple reason Defendants denied Plaintiff’s production request is the 7.8 million free-text response entries are allegedly too numerous for the agency’s limited resources.… While the burden to produce the requested free-text responses may be heavy, this Court does not find that it is unreasonable….

Notably, Plaintiff points to several studies published and presented by CDC that rely upon on [sic] the V-safe data.... All but one of those studies considered only the first seven days after receiving a vaccine, and the only study that looked beyond the first week considered just two weeks.... Defendants do not contest this.... Rather, Defendants dismiss the limited scope of the published studies as just “the time period that some scientists have chosen to use in their research studies.” …

Because Defendants structured V-safe to collect health and symptomatic responses for a full year after a vaccine or booster, reviewing that data is of great importance to the public. If “some scientists” — sponsored or platformed by Defendants — “have chosen to use” only the first week or two of data to report the vaccine is safe and effective, then other scientists should be permitted to access the data to “pierce the veil of administrative secrecy,” “open agency action to the light of public scrutiny,” and “promote the disclosure of information.”… Many of the policies previously addressed were enacted because of guidance from Defendants. With billions of taxpayer dollars expended to develop, distribute, administer, and fund messaging campaigns, Plaintiff assumes a hefty and viable public interest in examining the raw clinical data. Production of the free-text data will permit independent researchers to put the government agencies to their proof by considering all of the available data.…

Additionally, Plaintiff marshalled evidence that some vaccine studies may be misleading or based upon cherry-picked data.... One study reported that 0.8% to 1.1% of users reported needing medical care according to the check-the-box data.... However, when the raw data was released pursuant to separate FOIA litigation, it showed some 7.7% of V-safe users reported needing medical care and an additional 25% missing school or work or unable to perform normal activities.... Similarly, Plaintiff alleges the check-the-box data captures only the “symptoms CDC says are normal to occur after vaccination and are actually a sign the vaccine is working.”… Thus, collecting that data and then profiling the vaccine as safe and effective based [sic] was a “pointless” exercise… Any concerning symptoms would necessarily be restricted to only the free-text responses, to date unexamined by independent researchers not sponsored by Defendants.

Plaintiff has shown an urgent need to inform the public about “actual or alleged Federal Government activity” — namely, related to the health and safety of the COVID-19 vaccines and policies.…

Additionally, as addressed above, Plaintiff presents evidence that calls into question the claim that the vaccines are safe and effective — or at least the scope of research supporting that claim....

Notably, the sample size is massive — representing between 3– 4.5% of the vaccinated population — thus permitting particularly accurate research. The V-safe free-text responses will contribute to the public’s understanding of the COVID-19 vaccines — specifically as to the assertion by Defendants, the Biden administration, and others that the vaccine is “safe and effective” for everyone over six months of age — by providing access to the direct source material to treating physicians, researchers, parents, recipients, and non-recipients.... “[D]isclosure of the information will” permit any interested person to research and report “whether CDC properly analyzed the information to detect and evaluate clinically important adverse events and safety issues that impacted its relevant policies or regulatory decisions and recommendations.” … Further, all Americans continue to be the target audience of marketing and messaging campaigns to promote continued vaccination.  Additionally, even if the redacted responses are less useful than extrapolated MedDRA data, a position taken by Defendants…, the public nonetheless has the right to check the math.

CDC is ordered to comply with the following minimum production schedule:

(End quotes.)

Link to Aaron Siri’s Part 10:

V-Safe Part 10: Federal Judge Orders CDC to Make Public 7.8 Million V-safe Free-Text Entries Within 12 Months

Aaron Siri’s substack, Injecting Freedom, can be found at AaronSiri.substack.com.

Please see Part 5 for the final installment of this important series exposing the utter hypocrisy of our government agencies and medical establishment, the High Priests of Scientism.