Pushing Suicide in Canada-Let’s see the lawmakers who are TRYING TO LEGALIZE child murder, apply for MAiD THEMSELVES!

What kind of evil monsters would entice people to kill themselves? Or would kill children? Wait, I thought all these COVID restrictions and shots were because they value our lives SO MUCH?

BS”D

As the Canadian government plots to entice an ever greater number of Canadians, including children, to ask for death under their Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) program, the question looms larger: weren’t all those draconian lockdowns and vax requirements because they valued every person’s life so, so, so, much? I mean, that’s what they told us….

I’ve written about Canada’s euthanasia laws before, but the story is only getting more sickening.

A recent film advertisement for a clothing company - promoting death - is truly frightful in what it represents. Apparently, anything is acceptable, for profit.

The film’s young protagonist, 37-year old Jennyfer Hatch, wanted to live, and just needed proper healthcare from the government for her painful, physically disabling connective tissue disease. The Canadian government would not help her live, but was glad to help her die. So Jennyfer apparently felt she had no choice but euthanasia - because the government-run socialist health care system in Canada had abandoned her.

Here is the full, original, horrifying, assisted-suicide-glorifying film, titled “The Most Beautiful Exit,”produced by one of Canada’s most famous clothing retailers, Québec’s La Maison Simons , as part of its “All is Beauty” ad campaign. (Jewish men, who are required to be careful with what they see in terms of modesty should listen rather than view.)

This is a shortened version:

Ian Miles Cheong@stillgray

Canadian clothes retailer Simons is actually using suicide to market their products. No, this isn’t made up. It’s part of a sweeping effort to introduce medically assisted suicide as a treatment for mental illness, PTSD and even children with defects in Canada.

4:22 PM · Nov 27, 2022

---

4.5K Reposts · 10.1K Likes

We know the government is cruel and commits murder, but what of all the actors, artists, and filmmakers who participated in making the movie starring Jennyfer in the days leading up to her prescheduled, unnecessary death? Why didn’t any of them - or the sick clothing company, La Maison Simons - reach out to save this young, beautiful life? All that was needed was funds. Jennyfer didn’t want to die. She just needed money to help her live.

Aid to live doesn’t fit into a eugenicist budget, though.

From Vanessa Beeley’s substack:

Peter Simons, the former CEO of La Maison Simons, claimed that the advertisement epitomises the company’s values and was made to help build “human connection” and encourage people to be more moral—to “help build the communities we want to live in tomorrow, and leave to our children”. He praises his own courage for promoting this message. 

From Azra Dale’s substack, a piece by Michael Cook (link to Michael in original article below):

A Vancouver woman named Jennyfer Hatch died on October 23 at the hands of a MAiD doctor. She was suffering from a rare disease, Ehlers–Danlos syndrome, which gave her constant pain. There is no cure for EDS; the best doctors can do is manage the symptoms and check for complications.

Before she died, Jennyfer was the protagonist of a very artistic short film, “The Most Beautiful Exit”, about the hard “beauty” of dying through MAiD. It was part of a marketing campaign for a Quebec-based upscale fashion chain, La Maison Simons. As we reported last month, “the glittering video can’t quite hide the ghoulish side of this stunt”.

The film – which went viral on YouTube — did not disclose Jennyfer’s identity. But last week CTVNews named her and explained why she chose to die.

Because the Canadian health system failed her.

Speaking at a memorial service… her friend Tama Recker said tearfully: “She was such a fierce advocate for her own health and she was let down over and over and over again.”

“What she hoped that it would do is push the envelope that people could understand that it was her choice,” Ms Recker later told CTVNews. “Our (health-care) system is very broken and part of what Jennyfer wanted to do is get people talking.”

In fact, Jennyfer wanted to live. Back in June, she spoke to CTVNews under a pseudonym. This is how she described her predicament.

“I thought, ‘Goodness, I feel like I’m falling through the cracks so if I’m not able to access health care am I then able to access death care?’ And that’s what led me to look into MAID and I applied last year”. She went on to say that she had hoped to access palliative care or other means of support. However, she said, her “suffering was validated to the extent of being approved for MAID, but no additional resource has opened up.”

Azra Dale quotes Hendrik van der Breggen PhD who notes “To offer a ‘choice’ between suffering and death which neglects the option of actual assistance in living is evil.”

Azra:

This video was not cheap; dozens of friends and actors were involved in filming it over two days just before Thanksgiving. The Canadian advertising company must have worked frantically to edit the film by October 27. Peter Simons’s personal interest and investment must have made it all but impossible for Jennyfer to change her mind about dying. Does he really think that it is ethical to ask her to die according to an advertiser’s timetable?

…. stories are beginning to appear in the Canadian media about marginalised people who feel forced to access MAiD because they have only one choice — and it’s ugly.

Thirty-one-year old Denise has Multiple Chemical Sensitivities and has applied for MAiD because she cannot find housing where she will not be exposed to cigarette smoke and air fresheners.

Forty-year-old Mitchell Tremblay suffers from severe depression, anxiety, alcoholism, personality disorders and continual thoughts of suicide. He is unemployed and poor. He can’t wait to become eligible for MAiD. “You know what your life is worth to you. And mine is worthless,” he told CTV News.

From its inception in Canada when the supposedly very limited “Bill C-14” was passed in June 2016, the MAiD program has snowballed, as of course it would - just as the Nazis’ euthanasia campaign did.

---

A “study” was released in early 2017 showing that the government healthcare system would save millions by offering people who only have a short time left to live, the option to “reduce their suffering” by getting killed through injection just a bit earlier than they would have died otherwise. The estimate was that “about 80 per cent of patients will have cancer and 60 per cent will have their lives shortened by one month while 40 per cent will have their lives shortened by one week.”

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/medically-assisted-death-could-save-millions-1.3947481

Pure murder, of course. It matters not whether someone has a lifetime left or an hour left. We may not cause them to die. Only G-d decides that.

But of course, those conservative-sounding estimates were just a ploy to get the murderous plan past the front door. Once the sanctity of life is violated and death is taken into human hands, things quickly escalate.

From the first murders in 2016, the 2021 body count alone is now up to 10,064 - but that’s probably a falsely low number.

Hendrik van der Breggen PhD notes:

Here is the MAID casualty list for Canada thus far:

• 2016 – 1,018

• 2017 – 2,838

• 2018 – 4,480

• 2019 – 5,661

• 2020 – 7,603

• 2021 – 10,064

• 2022 – Number is yet to be calculated, but the trend is dark.

The above numbers are from the Canadian government document “Third annual report on Medical Assistance in Dying in Canada 2021.”

I should note that I wonder about the accuracy of this report. I suspect the numbers may be higher. Why? Because, according to the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario: “When completing the death certificate physicians: a. must list the illness, disease, or disability leading to the request for MAID as the cause of death; and b. must not make any reference to MAID or the drugs administered on the death certificate.”

Pretty soon, people were being encouraged to apply to get killed, and they could qualify not only if they had very little time left due to a terminal illness, but for many reasons. Poor people who couldn’t afford their bills, or young people with diabetes and depression.

As Dr. van der Breggen writes:

This brings me to my main point, which is hugely significant: Canada’s federal government supports the “choice” for medically-assisted suicide before ensuring Canadians actually have real options.

It turns out that the vast majority of Canadians don’t have access to good palliative care (palliative care is care that optimizes quality of life and mitigates suffering). Also, Canadian veterans (at least six so far) have been offered MAID to deal with their suffering instead of actually helping them (one veteran was offered MAID as an alternative to a wheelchair ramp/elevator). And there has been a case in which a disabled man successfully began the application process for MAID because he had trouble paying his bills and was afraid of becoming homeless.

As Vanessa Beeley notes in her excellent substack article (excerpts here:)

In March 2021, the law was amended by Bill C–7, which permits assisted euthanasia for patients whose death is not reasonably foreseeable. In 2021, it is estimated that more than 10,000 people were assisted in killing themselves in Canada. 

The Canadian federal expert panel on the application of MAiD for mental illness has recommended mental illness be grafted onto the MAiD framework without any legislative changes in March 2023. The first report of the federal special joint committee on MAiD suggests it will not only ignore all the problems caused by MAiD, but also further entrench and expand MAiD in Canada.

It was anticipated in an article in the Psychiatric Times when Bill C–7 was new that the legislative change would provide, not prevent, suicide for some mentally ill patients. The article highlighted the threat to ethical norms in psychiatry and reviewed comparable laws in various other countries:

“Currently, several countries, such as Belgium, the Netherlands, Luxembourg, and Switzerland, allow patients who are suicidal to receive death by either lethal injection (euthanasia) or a self-administered prescription for lethal medication (assisted suicide). In 2002 Belgium, the Netherlands, and Luxembourg (all three [being]collectively known as Benelux) legalised both these practices. Laws in those countries permitted voluntary death for patients whose physical or psychological suffering was unbearable and could not be effectively treated by means that were acceptable to them. A terminal condition was not a necessary criterion.”

According to the article, this led to psychiatric patients having suicide, rather than preventive therapy, provided to them. Between 100 and 200 patients with psychiatric disorders are being euthanised annually in Benelux as a whole. 

In concerned response to those developments abroad, the American Psychiatric Association issued a position statement in 2016: 

“A psychiatrist should not prescribe or administer any intervention to a non-terminally ill person for the purpose of causing death.”

The traditional role of a psychiatrist is to prevent patient suicide. The changes to assisted suicide laws, particularly in Canada, threaten to override these ethical standards. 

Mental illness is something that many people struggle with, especially in an increasingly oppressive and disenfranchised dystopia that has been rolled out in the form of the Covid–19 response. These Covid consequences include lockdown, mandatory vaccination, harsh economic sanctions against dissidents and increased homelessness, child abuse, depression, drug abuse—and, yes, suicide, associated with the disproportionate measures to curtail a virus promoted as a ‘deadly pandemic’. 

The Ottawa régime of WEF Young Global LeaderTrudeau—Liberals and Nazi sympathisers aided by the Bloc Québecois—forcibly shut down debate and passed Bill C–7, which included the amendment approving euthanasia for those suffering exclusively from mental health issues—issues in many instances brought on or exacerbated by the Trudeau lockdown package during the Covid two-year madness that began in early 2020.

Carla Qualtrough, Federal Minister of Employment, Workforce Development and Disability Inclusion, has recently expressed her disquiet at the Canadian status quo:

“[I]t should not be easier to access a medically assisted death than to get a wheelchair—but it is.”

Experts have been predicting a “pandemic” of mental illness and depression as a result of the Covid–19 project, and now that it has materialised, the same governments that introduced the measures designed to send their populations into a psychiatric free-fall are now offering suicide—funded and facilitated by the state and by not much else. In Canada, there is virtually no alternative palliative care available; the fast track is to death. Alex Schadenberg of the Euthanasia Prevention Coalitionsummed up Bill C–7 as follows:

1. Bill C–7 removed the requirement in the law that a person’s natural death be reasonably foreseeable in order to qualify for assisted death. Therefore, people who are not terminally ill could die by euthanasia. The Truchon decision only required this amendment to the law, but Bill C–7 goes further.

2. Bill C–7 permits a doctor or nurse practitioner to lethally inject a person who is incapable of consenting, if that person was previously approved for assisted death. This contravenes the Supreme Court of Canada Carter decision, which stated that only competent people could die by euthanasia.

3. Bill C–7 waives the ten-day waiting period if a person’s natural death is deemed to be reasonably foreseeable. Thus a person could request death by euthanasia on a “bad day” and die the same day. Studies prove that the “will to live fluctuates”.

4. Bill C–7 creates a two-track law. A person whose natural death is deemed to be reasonably foreseeable has no waiting period, while a person whose natural death is not deemed to be reasonably foreseeable would have a 90-day waiting period before being killed by lethal injection.

   (End of my excerpt from Vanessa’s article, more later.)

   ---

   Now, the government ruled that a diagnosis of mental illness alone is an acceptable reason to ask to be murdered. This will go into effect in March 2023.

From Daily Citizen:

“Canada already has one of the most permissive euthanasia regimes in the world – and it’s about to become even easier for Canadians to kill themselves. Starting in March 2023, Canadians will be able to kill themselves for the sole reason of being diagnosed with a mental illness.

“On March 17, assisted dying will become legal for Canadians with a mental disorder as their sole condition,” The Globe And Mail reports.

That will cover individuals like Julie Leblanc, who has been diagnosed with depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder and borderline personality disorder.

“She wavers between wanting to die and trying to live, especially for her 11-year-old son who is cared for by her parents,” The Globe And Mail reports.

Now, they’re debating allowing children to be killed, even if their parents don’t know or consent.

Of course, the government will save more and more money, the more sick or depressed or poor people they eliminate.

How to get all these people to actually request death, so they can murder them with “clean hands?”

That takes a devious mind. After all, G-d created us with a built-in will to live. What evilly manipulative propaganda would make more and more people want to die, for ever-less serious reasons?

Never fear. 😰 The Canadian government and their willing henchmen have the psychological marketing techniques for assisted suicide worked out, and they’re busy advertising.

One of the most frightening aspects of this is the talk of including children, who are short-sighted, impulsive, and suggestible, in the assisted suicide scheme without parental knowledge or consent. And remember, all someone needs to qualify, starting in March, will be a diagnosis of mental illness - which are being handed down frequently. How easy it would be for a teenager going through a rough patch to get a diagnosis.

In the show I watched this morning on the link below, the hosts imagined a horror scenario in which a young teen doesn’t come home from school. The worried parents call the authorities, but police and the school claim they have no information. The next day, they show up at the parents’ door to inform them that their daughter was killed yesterday, as per her request, and without the parents’ knowledge, as allowed by law (if that passes.)

https://www.redvoicemedia.com/2022/12/euthanasia-has-become-leading-cause-of-death-in-canada-canada-becomes-culling-humans-timcastirl-video/

(Disclaimer - I don’t know the hosts of the above program, and some of the personal opinions they offered are definitely ones I don’t agree with. However, they brought alive the threat to children, so I felt this video valuable to include.)

More details from Daily Citizen:

Canada’s MAID program has also gotten increasingly liberal since first being legalized. Starting in 2021, the Canadian Parliament passed new legislation that “introduced MAID eligibility for individuals for whom death was not reasonably foreseeable.”

In 2021, Canada’s euthanasia regime killed 219 individuals whose natural deaths were “not reasonably foreseeable.”

One Canadian man recently spoke about why he is applying for MAID – choosing to die – rather than become homeless. His case, along with others, demonstrates the grave problems prevalent with Canada’s euthanasia program.

In a recent interview with CityNews, the man said that he was afraid to die, but feared homelessness even more.

He “has started the process for end of life because his rooming house is up for sale, and he can’t find anywhere else to live that he can afford. He barely survives on Ontario disability support payments which are just over $1,200 a month,” CityNews reports.

The man said, “I don’t wish to be dead. Even with the pain. Even with the meds, I still want to be here.”

Earlier this year, the Daily Citizen highlightedanother tragic case where a man was killed by the country’s euthanasia program because he had hearing loss. That’s right, for hearing loss.

The man had no life-threatening medical conditions, wasn’t taking his needed medications and wasn’t wearing his cochlear implant. Still, his request for MAID was approved, and he was killed.

Even though Canada has tried to make its euthanasia regime seem like it has a semblance of reasonableness and is only for those who are gravely ill and near death, these cases demonstrate that is not the case.

Canada’s inclusion of mental illness as a reason to be euthanized will only open up its MAID program to further concerns and abuses. That’s especially true as the amount of people being diagnosed with mental illnesses continues to spike following the government-imposed COVID-19 lockdowns.

In the 1930s, the Nazi regime enacted its euthanasia program and labeled certain individuals, who were seen as costing society too much money, as “Lebensunwertes Leben,” or “life unworthy of life.” The Nazi Party sharedpropaganda images of disabled individuals with the following text: “This hereditarily ill person will cost our national community 60,000 Reichsmarks over the court of his lifetime. Citizen, this is your money.”

This same logic – where the worth of individuals is seen only in light of how much money they cost society – is also at work in Canada. According to some reports, some hospital staffers mention to patients how much it costs for them to remain in the hospital while also discussing euthanasia with them.

Every innocent human life is infinitely valuable and should be protected from conception to natural death.

Any instance of euthanasia is a tragedy. But there seems to be an even greater level of evil when the individual who requests to be killed could be helped with better counseling or an increase in charity and a place to live.

For a country that prides itself on its “compassionate” government sponsored social services, these facts seem to illustrate a dramatic gap.

More from Vanessa Beeley’s article:

Abuse of medical ethics and vulnerable patients at risk of choosing death over palliative care

Dr Ramona Coelho is a Canadian family physician whose practice specialises in the care of patients living with mental illness and disability. She was an expert witness before the House and Senate committees examining the bill to extend MAiD, and appeared as an expert before the federal special joint committee on MAiD. She is a founding member of Physicians Together With Vulnerable Canadians.

In July 2022, the London Free Press (Ontario) published an article by Coelho entitled Medical assistance in dying overused in Canada even before expansion. Coelho gives clear examples of MAiD abuse based on evidence provided by doctors, a patient and family members: 

1. “A man was admitted to hospital after suffering a small stroke affecting his balance and swallowing. He was feeling down and isolated due to a COVID-19 outbreak on his ward. The stroke neurologist anticipated he would be able to eat normally and regain most of his balance. Psychiatry diagnosed an adjustment disorder but noted his prognosis was very good. The patient then requested MAiD. Neither of his MAiD assessors had expertise in stroke rehabilitation and recovery. Because he was temporarily eating less, the MAiD assessors decided he could die right away instead of waiting the required 90 days for those living with disabilities despite having no terminal co-morbidities. He received MAiD the following week. This man died alone and depressed and before he had tried proper therapy or reached maximal recovery.”

2. “A 71-year-old widower was admitted to a Southwestern Ontario hospital after a fall. His family says that during his admission he contracted an infectious diarrheal illness. He was humiliated by staff for the smell of his room, his family said. He developed a new shortness of breath that was not comprehensively assessed. In this context, a hospital team member suggested he would qualify for MAiD. The team said he had end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and it was terminal. The patient was surprised by the diagnosis but trusted the team. Within 48 hours of his first assessment, he received a medically assisted death. Post-mortem testing showed he did not have end-stage COPD. His family doctor, when notified of his death, also stated he did not have end-stage COPD, but the team had failed to contact her when they were assessing his history.”

The level of coercion involved in these decisions by vulnerable patients in a weakened and perhaps severely humiliated state is terrifying. The decisions were evidently also based on inaccurate information; an abuse of trust by the medical professionals involved. As Coelho points out, “[t]here is no safeguard in the legislation that protects marginalised Canadians (victims of ageism, racism, or ableism) from MAiD being raised as a 'treatment option'”.

The case of Amir Farsoud has shocked Canadians into questioning the expansion of assisted dying into the realm of mental health, especially in the current unforgiving economic conditions globally. Farsoud is a disabled 54-year old who was approved for MAiD by his GP (family doctor). He was about to be made homeless and had no financial means to survive in Canada. In November this year, he needed one more doctor’s signature for his killing to be legal in 90 days time. In an interview with Toronto-based City News, he said: 

“I don’t want to die. But I don’t want to be homeless [i.e., am determined not to be homeless] more than I don’t want to die.”

Luckily for Farsoud, strangers stepped in to help him after hearing his tragic story and raised C$60,000 through a GoFundMe campaign to prevent his suicide. What is shocking is that it took the efforts of the media and public campaigning to provide solutions, while the medical professionals and government agencies stood idle.

Other such cases can be found here, here, here, hereand here. 

Euthanising babies up to a year old

Dr. Louis Roy, from the Quebec College of Physicians, told the Commons' Special Joint Committee on Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) in October that his organisation believes MAiD can be appropriate for infants up to age one who are born with “severe deformations” and “very grave and severe medical syndromes whose life expectancy and level of suffering are such that it would make sense to ensure that they do not suffer given that the possibility of survival is nil.”

Dr Roy was actually citing a statement published by the college in December 2021. 

After reflecting on expanding eligibility criteria for MAiD, the college announced it supported the idea of newborn euthanasia in cases with a very poor prognosis and “extreme suffering that cannot be relieved.” It also supported extending MAiD to 14- to 17-year-olds and encouraged more public discussion about endorsing euthanasia for seniors “tired of living.”

In the same October address, Dr. Roy reiterated that MAiD may also be expedient for the elderly who are “tired of being alive”. The needless deaths and abuse of the elderly abandoned in care homes was a common feature of the Covid–19 response in most countries that applied such inhumane measures. 

The same elderly Canadians must now fear being fast-tracked to suicide if they express a world-weariness that is understandable when governments and health services have been increasingly neglecting their care and support for decades. There is a dark pattern developing of devaluing ruling-class-designated “defective” members of society and finding ways to do away with them under cover of prevention of their suffering.

MAiD is replacing medical treatment and government assistance for those with social, economic and psychiatric issues.

Carla Qualtrough, the above-quoted Canadian Minister for Employment, Workforce Development and Disability Inclusion, is among those hotly contesting the inclusion of infants in the MAiD programme. She finds the suggestion of infant suicide to be “shocking and unacceptable”. 

Qualtrough has also referred to the cases of people with disabilities who are registering for MAiD because they are unable to find housing or adequate home care:

“Working with the disability community and hearing very regularly that people's options around MAID are being driven by lack of social supports is devastating.”

Below is an excerpt from a report by journalists Clayton and Natali Morris on their RedactedYouTube channel, covering the potential inclusion of ‘mature minors’ in MAiD.

Link to Azra Dale’s substack:

MAiD in Canada – All is Not Beauty

Igor Chudov pointed out something very significant: the “Blue Whale” imagery used in Simons’ film starring Jennyfer is a known suicide symbol.

I had no idea. Please see his article below - he brings horrifying information about a game in which evil people called “Blue Whales” would gain children’s trust online and then push them into killing themselves.

Creepy "Blue Whale" Suicide Symbol is Openly Glorified In Canada

Vanessa Beeley brings very important details about the Nazi euthanasia program and the current Canadian Nazi connections: I bolded/italicized some things that I felt were particularly important.

The dehumanisation of victims and the death salesmen

In 1941, Hitler’s propaganda chief, Josef Goebbels, commissioned a film to normalise the criminal Nazi T4 euthanasia programme. The film, Ich klage an (I Accuse), was a huge commercial success watched by more than 18 million people.

This romanticised scene-setting was far removed from the gruesome reality of the Nazi euthanasia programme, which exterminated between 275,000 and 300,000 mentally or physically disabled victims from 1939 to 1945. 

During the Nuremberg medical trials, Hitler’s personal physician, Dr Karl Brandt, defended the euthanasia programme with the following words in 1948, and they were to be his last: 

“I think that everybody who has any imagination will turn away shudderingly (sic) from the mis development of nature. These people live under cruel imagination and persecution manias, partly without any consciousness, and one can safely say that every one of these people if they for one clear moment would be able to see their real condition would be very grateful to be dead.”

The Nazis wanted to rid Germany of the “resource-draining” members of the population. Is what we are seeing develop in Canada with the proposed expansion of MAiD any different? 

Justin Trudeau, Chrystia Freeland and their Nazi connections 

On 25 November, Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova published a brief opinion piece, of which the following is an excerpt: 

Canada legalised physician-assisted suicides in 2016. The number of people who wish to be euthanised has been growing annually. In all probability, Canada will reach 50,000 such deaths a year—an achievement worthy of a country that took care of and gave refuge to the surviving Nazi scum.

I would remind you that the Third Reich with its Aktion T4 programme (Tiergartenstraße-4) was the first state to introduce euthanasia on a mass scale. Apart from racial prejudice, the Nazis proceeded from economic considerations. It was expensive to pay for people requiring treatment. This was a tax burden.

According to a document found in the Hartheim Euthanasia Centre in Nazi Germany, 70,273 people were killed under the Tiergartenstraße-4 programme by September 1, 1941. An unknown Nazi clerk noted with chilling pragmatism: “Considering that these patients could live for another ten years, this is a saving of 885,439,800 Reichsmarks in total.”

Is the motivation of neoliberal Ottawa different from that of the Reich? Judge for yourselves.

I met with Maria Zakharova in Moscow in November 2016. During the meeting, she became visibly emotional as she described the suffering of her grandparents during the “Great Patriotic War” at the hands of the Nazis. For the majority of Russians, the re-emergence of Nazism in Ukraine on Russian borders, protected, armed, trained and promoted by the West—and with Canada playing an instrumental role—is an intolerable aberration. 

Justin Trudeau has close WEF ties to Klaus Schwab, who himself has Nazi origins, and Chrystia Freeland, Deputy Prime Minister, also has much-denied ties to the German Nazi Party and the modern day ultra-nationalist Banderites in Ukraine: her maternal grandfather was a Nazi collaboratorand promoter of Nazi doctrine through Ukrainian Nazi-sympathetic media channels. 

This grandfather, Michael Chomiak (a later Anglo-Polish spelling of his name, which was originally spelt the Ukrainian way as Mykhailo Khomiak) was editor-in-chief of the Kraków News(Ukrainian: Krakivs’ki Visti), which was known to be vehemently anti-Semitic and published Nazi propaganda on a daily basis, was kept afloat with German financial aid and was pushed to the forefront of media exposure by Joseph Goebbels himself. 

Journalist and historian John Helmer has written extensively on the subject and he has reported on German military records found in a Polish government archive in Warsaw:

revealing that Michael Chomiak [...] volunteered to serve in the German invasion of Poland long before the German Army attacked the Soviet Union and invaded Ukraine. Chomiak’s records show that he was trained in Vienna for German espionage and propaganda operations, then promoted to run the German press machine for the Galician region of Ukraine and Poland during the four-year occupation. So high-ranking and active in the Nazi cause was Chomiak that the Polish intelligence services were actively hunting for Chomiak until the 1980s—without knowing he had fled for safety to an Alberta farm in Canada.

Richard Sanders, editor of Press for Conversion and member of the Coalition to Oppose the Arms Trade, went further in his investigation into Canada’s role in keeping Nazism alive after 1945. Sanders concluded that the personal Freeland Nazi connections were a diversion from the more sinister reality that Canada had imported tens of thousands of “displaced persons” of Ukrainian heritage in the years following the Second World War. In 2017, he wrote:

Many thousands of these immigrants harboured such extremely nationalistic ideologies towards Ukraine that they had sympathised and collaborated with the Nazi regime during the war. Many were pleased to do this because they had been led to believe—by their mass media, the [Uniate] church and other powerful civic institutions—that the Third Reich was a benevolent, liberating force which was assisting them in the noble cause of promoting Ukrainian culture. They also felt a strong affinity to the Nazis because they shared a common worldview which despised two mortal enemies: Jews and communists. This worldview—regarding a Judeo-Bolshevik enemy—was also shared by many mainstream Canadians at that time, including many among this country's top political and religious leaders.

Sanders describes the new Ukrainian Canadians as several thousand veterans from two Nazi-influenced military formations: the Waffen-SS Galicia Division and the Ukrainian Insurgent Army (UPA). This was the military wing of the Organisation of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN-B) led by the notorious ethnic cleansing Stepan Bandera, who is now iconised in Zelensky’s Ukraine. The ultra-nationalist ideologies that these refugees carried with them still permeate Canada’s political and institutional class. A friend of Freeland's is Paul Grod, the president of the Ukrainian Canadian Congress (UCC). According to Sanders, the UCC “had core national member organisations that represent the leadership of both factions within the OUN, including the more extreme Banderites”. 

The Trudeau régime's totalitarian roots came to the surface during the crackdown on dissent during the two-year marathon of the state's Covid–19 response. The Freedom Convoy organisers were brutalised by state security forces, discredited as “right-wing extremists” and had their bank accounts frozen for daring to question Covid–19 measures, including mandatory experimental and high-risk vaccines, that were intended to further victimise the working class and disenfranchised members of Canadian society. Debanking is a term that accurately describes the government collusion with the banking system to target individuals with “adverse” political views in order to intimidate and silence opposition. Does this sound familiar?

Dr. Mark Trozzi, a vehement opponent of the Covid–19 measures, wrote in February 2022:

“In addition to invoking the Emergencies Act  to use force against the peaceful truckers and citizens protests; the Trudeau regime now also has the Emergency Economic Measures Order. This gross violation of the G-d-given right to private property, involves freezing the accounts and insurance policies of anyone involved in expressing an opinion contrary to the Trudeau regime's dictates and lies.”

The unthinkable is back in vogue

Fred Haight summarises the situation thus:

“[T]hese and other arguments marshalled in favour of euthanasia in Canada bear a striking resemblance to those made in the past to justify eugenics. At the turn of the 20th century, the fiercest proponents of euthanasia and eugenics were physicians and academics. In the US, Dr Ella K. Dearborn cheerfully called for ‘euthanasia for the incurably ill, insane, criminals and degenerates’. Dearborn thought it entirely reasonable that everyone should pass an examination allowing them to continue living. In 1906, one sociologist noted in the Minneapolis Journal: ‘I would personally rather administer chloroform to the poor, starving children of New York, Philadelphia, Chicago and other American cities, than to see them living as they must in squalor and misery.’

Zakharova put it rather more succinctly when she said: 

The abhorrent Nazi interpretation of eugenics was reincarnated in neoliberalism and received an official seal of approval in Canadian law. This is what all progressives are appealing for today.

It should be borne in mind that Bill C–7 permits a doctor or nurse practitioner to lethally inject a person who is incapable of consenting, if that person was previously approved for assisted death. As Zakharova has pointed out:

“I’d like to recall a sentence from the Hippocratic Oath: “Neither will I administer a poison to anybody when asked to do so, nor will I suggest such a course.”

Russian philosopher Sergey Shevchenko wrote an article in 2019 entitled Why can’t euthanasia be allowed in Russia?. Shevchenko argues that the reason why is that if medically-assisted death were to be legalised, situations would arise where those unable to afford medical treatment or who are afraid of being a burden to their relatives might be unfairly persuaded to take the assisted suicide route. He writes:

“In other words, euthanasia can become an “easy solution” not only for the suffering person but also for both social groups and institutions that are ready to sacrifice a lot in the fight for some economic expediency.”

In Canada, Justice Minister David Lametti is being pressured to delay the expansion of MAiD amid growing public and medical professional unease, but he declined to promise any moratorium. 

Claiming that substantial resources have been put into the MAiD project (but not into providing alternative health and psychiatric support), Lametti told MPs: 

“We’ll work in good faith to make sure that Canadians are ready for mental disorder as a sole criterion for seeking MAiD.”

In 1940, Canadian poet Earle Birney wrote a poem called David that extolled the virtues of euthanasia. This poem was required reading in high schools across Canada for decades. Canada has danced with orchestrated death for a very long time, and now this subliminal advocacy for legitimising murder as “assisted suicide” has come to the fore again in a very sinister manner.  

Vanessa also has fascinating information, earlier on in her article, about the eugenicist intertwinement to the effort to establish a one-world global government. She describes Julian Huxley and the origins of the United Nations agency UNESCO:

“Much that is now unthinkable may at least become thinkable.” Julian Huxley, brother of Brave New World author Aldous Huxley and president of the British Eugenics Society (1959–62), said this when he founded and was Director-General (1946–48) of UNESCO (the United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organisation). The mandate for the new organisation was set out clearly in Huxley’s 1946 UNESCO: Its Purpose and Its Philosophy.

We’ve covered the UN and UNESCO previously so I skipped a bit:

….Rees was joined by a Canadian psychiatrist named George Brock Chisholm. In 1948, Chisholm founded a UN-affiliated body called the World Health Organisation (WHO) with the aim of allegedly promoting mental and physical health of the world. As Ehret points out, Chisholm’s mission was effectively the eradication of monotheistic religion, family and patriotism. Eight years after the WHO was founded, Chisholm stated: 

“To achieve world government, it is necessary to remove from the minds of men their individualism, loyalty to family tradition, national patriotism and religious dogmas.”

With the WHO and UNESCO established as partners in the endeavour to make the unthinkable thinkable, a third organisation entered the cartel. The World Federation of Mental Health was also created in 1948, and put in charge of it was none other than Brigadier-General John Rawlings Rees—appointed to the post by Montagu Norman, Director of the Bank of England and co-founder of the Bank for International Settlements, who had created the World Federation as an extension of his own British National Association for Mental Health.

Jim Keith, author of Mind Control, World Control: The Encyclopedia of Mind Control, writes: 

The relation of eugenics to British psychiatry bears examination. The primary controlling body for psychiatry in England is the British National Association for Mental Health (NAMH), formed in 1944, and initially run by the mentally unstable Montagu Norman, previously of the Bank of England. The group originally met at Norman's London home, where he and Nazi Economics Minister Hjalmar Schacht had met in the 1930s to arrange financing for Hitler.

The U.S. technical coordinator to the conference that created the WFMH made the new organisation’s origins clearly known. Nina Ridnour wrote that “the World Federation for Mental Health […] had been created upon the recommendation of the United Nations World Health Organization and UNESCO because they needed a non-governmental mental health organisation with which they could cooperate.”

Matt Ehret’s 2021 article How the unthinkable became thinkable: Eric Lander, Julian Huxley and the awakening of sleeping monsters describes the unthinkable alliance thus:

Over the ensuing years, UNESCO, the WHO and WFMH worked in tandem to coordinate hundreds of influential sub organisations, universities, research labs, and covert science including the CIA’s MK Ultra in order to bring about the desired “mentally healthy” society cleansed of its connections to (religion), faith in truthfulness, national patriotism or family.

This is not merely of historical interest. A recent article in The Conservative Woman aptly describes the Great Reset as the Great Regression:

“Eugenics (the devaluing of life into a commodity) is a growing theme in the propaganda of the globalists. You and I are disposable entities, with limited use. If not functioning well enough to provide the labour, service and taxes they want, and becoming a burden on the state, then why not kill us off?”

Link to Vanessa’s original article (there is more there!)

Canada's expanding euthanasia laws: Making the unthinkable thinkable again

May G-d expose and destroy all the evil speedily in our days.

We must speak up everywhere for true morality, as He lays it down in the Torah - not human-invented “codes of ethics,” which are just excuses for people’s wicked desires.