Every time you hear a "climate change" scare story, that person was PAID. He is a Rockefeller stooge. He may not know it; but his profession has been entirely corrupted
A reader emailed me the following wonderful insight:
“Some people are even old enough to remember being taught in the second grade that plants take in carbon dioxide and give off oxygen, and people take in oxygen and give off carbon dioxide!
That was in 1962, so I always knew it was a crock that people and cows and human activity are destroying the earth by producing carbon dioxide.
Ever notice they're not concerned with the CO2 given off by alligators, bears, mountain lions and wolves?
A person might even go to prison for killing one, and the government is letting them loose (the bears and wolves and mountain lions) in areas where they've been gone for years.“
What a terrific article, bringing together the work of Jacob, Elizabeth and Brucha, painting a picture so full of astonishing hubris and self-belief as well as of EVIL. No other word gets close, with the exception perhaps of diabolical, Luciferian and satanic.
One small addition is this. Not only do plants, the sole way that energy in sunlight gets captured & fixed on earth, do better when atmospheric CO2 is increased, but miraculously, those plants also do better even in drought conditions.
Why is this? Well, in order to take in the required atmospheric CO2 in order to fix it using the energy captured in the amazing natural, biochemical process known as photosynthesis, the leaves on the plant must open. The greater the concentration of CO2 in the air, the LESS the pores on thf leaves need to be open. That in turn reduces water loss by transpiration from those pores in the leaves. So they require less irrigation. It’s a virtuous cycle. More CO2 in the air means improved plant growth yet is sparing of water need. Isn’t that something?
Another important thing is to acknowledge that atmospheric CO2 is appreciably higher now than when I was born (1960). The concentration now is approximately 420 parts per million. I believe it was around 280ppm in 1960.
Now, that’s been spun as “our fault”, a consequence of burning all those fossil fuels, like coal, natural gas and petrol / diesel. It’s a seductive claim & one that it never crossed by mind until recently to even examine. It’s “obviously true”. Right?
We’ve been burning all these fossil fuels, making lots of CO2, and the concentration of CO2 is increasing in the atmosphere as a result. Simple.
Problem. It’s simply not true. When isotope analysis has been done on the CO2 in the atmosphere and in the alleged sources (fuels) it doesn’t match. Most of the increase over the last 60 years must come from other sources.
The best hypothesis is that the source of the bulk of the increase in atmospheric CO2 is the oceans. CO2 dissolves in water and is in equilibrium with it. You’ll notice that a soft drink with fizz in it goes flat rather rapidly if it’s allowed to warm up. This is because warm water dissolves LESS gaseous CO2 than does cold water.
When the oceans warm up, even by a tiny amount, the water liberates CO2. The mass of the atmosphere is very small compared with the enormous mass of seawater. The very interesting thing is that there is a very substantial delay between any warning of the atmosphere and a resulting warming of the oceans. This delay is hundreds of years. Though this sounds almost absurd, it isn’t when again you reflect on how small the mass of the atmosphere is compared with the mass of seawater. So if there was a warmer period, hundreds of years ago, then now would be the time we’d expect to note an increase in atmospheric CO2. And there was. The so-called “Medieval Warm Period” was real. Sonething other than humans caused a warming several hundred years ago and I think the bulk of the increase in atmospheric CO2 today is an echo of that period. It follows that atmospheric CO2 will fall again, because there were other periods when temperatures were lower. European history shows that, in winter, many of the great rivers would routinely be frozen solid for months. Their were fairs set up on the ice and skating was popular. That period of colder air will have been slowly moving the temperature of the oceans downward and that will result in CO2 being pulled back into the water.
Regardless of the accuracy or otherwise of these offered interpretations, there is no doubt that the dominant source of heat energy impinging on the surface of the earth is the sun. It’s output does vary. Furthermore, the exact shape of earth’s orbit around thd sun varies from time to time. Additionally, the angle that earth’s north / south axis of rotation also varies slightly over long periods of time. Taken together, these and nothing else drive temperature changes on the surface of the earth. Not humans. We couldn’t warm the world even if we wanted to.
Even the CO2 based “greenhouse effect” is a lie. We know this for sure because we have geological evidence that atmospheric CO2 has been very much higher than it is today, even ten times as much, during ice ages.
Scholars of the poles have obtained drilled ice cores and these are a kind of time machine (lower case: the book, the Time Machine, was written by Fabian and eugenicist, HG Wells, who went on to tutor Aldous Huxley of Brave New World fame & he in turn taught French to George Orwell, who’s 1984 is at present being used by the perpetrators as an operating manual).
Those ice cores contain bubbles which captured samples of air through which snow fell, thousands of years ago. So we have a record of atmospheric CO2 extending back into deep time. It’s possible to obtain a surrogate for atmospheric temperature at the time by examining the ratios of isotopes of oxygen.
This yields the infamous graph that Al Gore shows to frighten people, as he claims there’s a relationship between CO2 and temperature. He states that when we raise atmospheric CO2, that drives up temperature.
But that’s not what the graphs show at all. There is indeed a relationship between atmospheric CO2 and temperature, but ITS THE OTHER WAY AROUND. It’s temperature changes that precede & cause atmospheric CO2 to change, after a long delay and by the mechanism I described.
There’s nothing we have not been lied to about.
You must not be passive in this. It’s not “complex atmospheric science” so you little people cannot “deny climate change”.
While it isn’t simple in its details, the concepts are simple enough and importantly, precisely the opposite of what the lying totalitarians tell you.
If anything, we need a campaign to inform & educate people to understand that CO2 is good and we should if anything take steps likely to increase it, NOT decrease it.
You’ll long ago have grasped that the underlying proposition behind the push to electric vehicles (EVs) is just another lie. The purpose of this push is not to get you to give up your internal combustion engined (ICE) cars & move to EVs. It’s to deprive you all of privately owned, powered transport and tie you into “15 minute cities”.
Don’t accept this. You MUST know enough to expose & stand firm about us being lied to, otherwise the evil doers will succeed.
Dr. Yeadon, THANK YOU SO MUCH for this amazingly informative comment.
I am in awe of the astonishingly complex, beautiful, intertwined wisdom inherent in the workings of the world that G-d created and runs every moment, which you have so clearly explained in layman’s terms. It’s absolutely fascinating.
This is an amazing piece of work. Shocking, to know the complete takeover, but shades of hope as the fb post shows people have had enough and recognise some of the nonsense now. Please G-d more will wake up, find G-d and live a life in tune with His designs not the globalists. We will all die, may we have the courage to live well according to G-d’s laws until we meet Him and are judged accordingly. He will have the last word, in the end He wins.
Valentina Zharkova on the sun driving climate change: Professor Of Physics & Mathematics at Northumbria University, Valentina Zharkova is a solar physicist.
In fact, she is probably the world’s leading solar physicist.
They infiltrated and corrupted countless American Christian seminaries over the past century as well. No doubt one of the most powerful masonic/Illuminati families.
A reader emailed me the following wonderful insight:
“Some people are even old enough to remember being taught in the second grade that plants take in carbon dioxide and give off oxygen, and people take in oxygen and give off carbon dioxide!
That was in 1962, so I always knew it was a crock that people and cows and human activity are destroying the earth by producing carbon dioxide.
Ever notice they're not concerned with the CO2 given off by alligators, bears, mountain lions and wolves?
A person might even go to prison for killing one, and the government is letting them loose (the bears and wolves and mountain lions) in areas where they've been gone for years.“
What a terrific article, bringing together the work of Jacob, Elizabeth and Brucha, painting a picture so full of astonishing hubris and self-belief as well as of EVIL. No other word gets close, with the exception perhaps of diabolical, Luciferian and satanic.
One small addition is this. Not only do plants, the sole way that energy in sunlight gets captured & fixed on earth, do better when atmospheric CO2 is increased, but miraculously, those plants also do better even in drought conditions.
Why is this? Well, in order to take in the required atmospheric CO2 in order to fix it using the energy captured in the amazing natural, biochemical process known as photosynthesis, the leaves on the plant must open. The greater the concentration of CO2 in the air, the LESS the pores on thf leaves need to be open. That in turn reduces water loss by transpiration from those pores in the leaves. So they require less irrigation. It’s a virtuous cycle. More CO2 in the air means improved plant growth yet is sparing of water need. Isn’t that something?
Another important thing is to acknowledge that atmospheric CO2 is appreciably higher now than when I was born (1960). The concentration now is approximately 420 parts per million. I believe it was around 280ppm in 1960.
Now, that’s been spun as “our fault”, a consequence of burning all those fossil fuels, like coal, natural gas and petrol / diesel. It’s a seductive claim & one that it never crossed by mind until recently to even examine. It’s “obviously true”. Right?
We’ve been burning all these fossil fuels, making lots of CO2, and the concentration of CO2 is increasing in the atmosphere as a result. Simple.
Problem. It’s simply not true. When isotope analysis has been done on the CO2 in the atmosphere and in the alleged sources (fuels) it doesn’t match. Most of the increase over the last 60 years must come from other sources.
The best hypothesis is that the source of the bulk of the increase in atmospheric CO2 is the oceans. CO2 dissolves in water and is in equilibrium with it. You’ll notice that a soft drink with fizz in it goes flat rather rapidly if it’s allowed to warm up. This is because warm water dissolves LESS gaseous CO2 than does cold water.
When the oceans warm up, even by a tiny amount, the water liberates CO2. The mass of the atmosphere is very small compared with the enormous mass of seawater. The very interesting thing is that there is a very substantial delay between any warning of the atmosphere and a resulting warming of the oceans. This delay is hundreds of years. Though this sounds almost absurd, it isn’t when again you reflect on how small the mass of the atmosphere is compared with the mass of seawater. So if there was a warmer period, hundreds of years ago, then now would be the time we’d expect to note an increase in atmospheric CO2. And there was. The so-called “Medieval Warm Period” was real. Sonething other than humans caused a warming several hundred years ago and I think the bulk of the increase in atmospheric CO2 today is an echo of that period. It follows that atmospheric CO2 will fall again, because there were other periods when temperatures were lower. European history shows that, in winter, many of the great rivers would routinely be frozen solid for months. Their were fairs set up on the ice and skating was popular. That period of colder air will have been slowly moving the temperature of the oceans downward and that will result in CO2 being pulled back into the water.
Regardless of the accuracy or otherwise of these offered interpretations, there is no doubt that the dominant source of heat energy impinging on the surface of the earth is the sun. It’s output does vary. Furthermore, the exact shape of earth’s orbit around thd sun varies from time to time. Additionally, the angle that earth’s north / south axis of rotation also varies slightly over long periods of time. Taken together, these and nothing else drive temperature changes on the surface of the earth. Not humans. We couldn’t warm the world even if we wanted to.
Even the CO2 based “greenhouse effect” is a lie. We know this for sure because we have geological evidence that atmospheric CO2 has been very much higher than it is today, even ten times as much, during ice ages.
Scholars of the poles have obtained drilled ice cores and these are a kind of time machine (lower case: the book, the Time Machine, was written by Fabian and eugenicist, HG Wells, who went on to tutor Aldous Huxley of Brave New World fame & he in turn taught French to George Orwell, who’s 1984 is at present being used by the perpetrators as an operating manual).
Those ice cores contain bubbles which captured samples of air through which snow fell, thousands of years ago. So we have a record of atmospheric CO2 extending back into deep time. It’s possible to obtain a surrogate for atmospheric temperature at the time by examining the ratios of isotopes of oxygen.
This yields the infamous graph that Al Gore shows to frighten people, as he claims there’s a relationship between CO2 and temperature. He states that when we raise atmospheric CO2, that drives up temperature.
But that’s not what the graphs show at all. There is indeed a relationship between atmospheric CO2 and temperature, but ITS THE OTHER WAY AROUND. It’s temperature changes that precede & cause atmospheric CO2 to change, after a long delay and by the mechanism I described.
There’s nothing we have not been lied to about.
You must not be passive in this. It’s not “complex atmospheric science” so you little people cannot “deny climate change”.
While it isn’t simple in its details, the concepts are simple enough and importantly, precisely the opposite of what the lying totalitarians tell you.
If anything, we need a campaign to inform & educate people to understand that CO2 is good and we should if anything take steps likely to increase it, NOT decrease it.
You’ll long ago have grasped that the underlying proposition behind the push to electric vehicles (EVs) is just another lie. The purpose of this push is not to get you to give up your internal combustion engined (ICE) cars & move to EVs. It’s to deprive you all of privately owned, powered transport and tie you into “15 minute cities”.
Don’t accept this. You MUST know enough to expose & stand firm about us being lied to, otherwise the evil doers will succeed.
Best wishes
Mike
Dr. Yeadon, THANK YOU SO MUCH for this amazingly informative comment.
I am in awe of the astonishingly complex, beautiful, intertwined wisdom inherent in the workings of the world that G-d created and runs every moment, which you have so clearly explained in layman’s terms. It’s absolutely fascinating.
This is an amazing piece of work. Shocking, to know the complete takeover, but shades of hope as the fb post shows people have had enough and recognise some of the nonsense now. Please G-d more will wake up, find G-d and live a life in tune with His designs not the globalists. We will all die, may we have the courage to live well according to G-d’s laws until we meet Him and are judged accordingly. He will have the last word, in the end He wins.
Climate change is just one issue with Rockefeller. Here's another:
ROCKEFELLER MEDICINE: Why Doctors Don't Know Anything About Nutrition
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uwp0NzjzL3c
Exactly
Thank you for your hard dedicated work to write about Truth. God is watching❣️🙏
Thank you so much for your encouraging words. I really appreciate it! 🩷
Valentina Zharkova on the sun driving climate change: Professor Of Physics & Mathematics at Northumbria University, Valentina Zharkova is a solar physicist.
In fact, she is probably the world’s leading solar physicist.
Podcast link: https://jermwarfare.com/podcast/valentina-zharkova-on-the-sun-driving-climate-change
They infiltrated and corrupted countless American Christian seminaries over the past century as well. No doubt one of the most powerful masonic/Illuminati families.
https://www.pinterest.com/pin/522065781776826591/visual-search/?x=16&y=16&w=532&h=723