We accepted mass schooling - long term physical, mental, moral, emotional and spiritual abuse of innocent children in detention centres and concentration camps - mass indoctrination in atheistic state propaganda!
We accepted mass contraception - anti-life initiatives - regardless of the consequences for the newly conceived baby or the woman's health and future fertility.
We accepted mass abortion, via contraceptive abortion of the newly conceived, right up to full-term.
Now WE have a problem with what THEY are doing to us.
Yes, I was thinking the same thing as I was reading that. We have gone along with these agendas for far too long. Now it will bite us in the butt if we are not careful.
I checked the background of Vernon Coleman. I've seen previous verification of a lot of his statements on governments pushing euthanasia, so I can say he is telling the truth here. But I have deep misgivings about recommending his site as a truth source.
His Bitchute channel and his personal website contain a lot of absolute rubbish relating to Israel. Some examples:
Apparently he knows that his 'genocide' accusations won't stand up to the truth -- his videos accusing the WHO and other global enemies of humanity allow viewer comments, while his Israel-bashing vid is the only one where he has blocked feedback.
Hannah: Yep, he has outed himself as an antisemite, as have an ASTONISHING number of people who have been activists in the Covid Era fight for freedom from medical tyranny. I use the 12-Step Program guidance to "take what you like and leave the rest". I just shared this video while conceding that Dr. Coleman is antisemitic BUT underscoring that he is spot on in this video focused only on the growing strategic roll-out of legalized medical murder.
Well, Professor Stevanovitch, whenever I hear "Khazarian Mafia" I can't help but think of the various intellectual enthusiasms of the famous FICTION WRITER who embroidered & published his never-substantiated, un-scholarly hypotheses as purported "history" of Ashkenazi Jews. At different times in his life, Arthur Koestler cycled through strong intellectual commitments to communism, euthanasia, anti-communism, etc. until finally killing himself in a suicide-pact with his much younger wife. But I feel sure that YOU, Professor Stevanovitch, can provide us with the sources, citations, substantiating evidence, formal documentation, and proper historical scholarship hidden from us all in the interim 50 years since Koestler wrote his Parvum Opus about the "Khazarian Mafia" on which you have such expertise.
Blessin's to Brucha for gettin' the important message out!
Thanks ta you Hannah fer lettin' us all know 'bout this "side" of Dr. Coleman--nooz ta me as well. It's chilly at best, mis-understandin' a lot fer sure... ugly (velly) at worst.
BUT I myself am nevertheless tootin' Dr "Coal-Man in the Colemine's" horn on this one announcement-- 'bout the dire message re. euthanasia that Brucha too is sharin' herewith--Cuz it's far beyond killin' us all with just the clot shots that we already are aware've--it's downright murder--an' we're all affected--Jews too!
So IMO alerts first, quibble with the rest later! (I do so myself--in the comments! I take a lotta heat fer speakin' well of us "chews" against the "uninformed" even tho' I myself'd like ta see BibiGUN strung up on a string of clot shots 'n green passes pronto. No fan of that puppet am I.
But triage is essential. We're livin' in the Emergency Room (the entire world is one in some ways). Dire warnin's first, fightin' the haters later (b/c they'ze always around...sigh)
Whatever ya do--stay away from hoss-spit-alls, MSM, social workers (many are now rat finks), clinics, an' "skools!" It's all bein' monetized.... Zei gezundt!
ps I write "funny" i.e. in the vernacular fer many reasons includin' that I'm an act-teur an' it keeps the bots away but here I'm "dead serious"--pun aside--cuz they DO wanna kill us all (oy)
Re: Liability in the Heavenly Court for theft of copyrighted material
Dear Mrs. Weisberger,
Since I'm a ben Noach, I thought you might want to know that many people have not had the occasion to learn how very extremely strict U.S. copyright law really is and I would ask (just for starters) if you got permission or otherwise proved there isn't need for permission for the use of that cartoon at the very beginning of this article.
I had my entire 2019 book manuscript, Jews: Go Long! | A Report on the Practicality and Desirability of the Final Redemption (which to a significant degree predicted something like the lockdowns to happen in the near future, which it did), up for free as a PDF on my website for a long time but it's down now except for Chapter 3 because there are still copyright concerns I have to address. This is a ninth draft so copyright was already worked on in previous drafts with the teeth of the fine-toothed comb getting increasingly finer.
Exposing lies is very important but how will HaShem make that effort prosper if there is inadvertent theft along the way? You've been doing a lot of hard work but I wanted to make sure it will fully succeed. Not accusing but just pointing out many have not had a chance to learn that the laws of the land are very extreme in this area.
It is truly daunting to know just how much stuff is copyrighted. News clips are not public domain. Legacy media are run by CIA so why would they give permission to a documentary filmmaker (short of a miracle) to make a critical work with clips from their original propaganda? But even that miracle could happen. The point: the U.S. government engineers sin into the fabric of the dictatorship with the goal that we will be constantly deserving in the Heavenly Court of having tyranny. Theft is one example so they try to restrict everything that shouldn't be restricted by copyright in that way. I'm not saying it's not daunting. But I wanted to know if you were aware and being careful about this. Many people simply have not had the occasion to learn how many things are copyrighted. I've been working for years on doing restitution for theft, usually paying groups that I don't want to see make any money because my rabbi told me it has to be paid back and this even is a higher priority than charity and charity has to be put on hold to pay them back!!!
You may be interested, by the way, to read my most recent report about the middah kineged middah aspects of a certain topic. The report is called Abortion and Gun Control: Cause and Effect. Imagine how much freedom can be won by mankind understanding the sin theory of dictatorship and embracing the repentance theory of freedom, whether the arena is abortion or theft or something else entirely where actions have to be corrected.
Stay tuned for my upcoming music video album mainly on shmiras halashon (guarding the tongue/not gossiping--and gossip is defined as being 100% true!) and the miraculous physical illness G-d used to alert me to its great importance. The project uses humor related to our family dog to lure unsuspecting people into watching it because I once saw someone take a bite of soap that looked like candy. If some people really think they don't want Torah, I decided to disguise it as entertainment.
Thank you Mr. Hingson. I hold your fear of Heaven in high regard and sincerely appreciate your taking the time to write to me about this topic.
I checked with my Rabbi and found that the concern you presented is in actuality two separate issues.
1) Theft:
My Rabbi said that I’m clear of theft concerns, because I’m careful to attribute material that’s not mine.
My remarks: When I present someone else’s material but I give them credit for it, and I do not take away profit that they would have earned on the material had I not published it, I am not “stealing.” In addition and to the contrary, it is very likely that the authors or artists whose work I present would want their work to be seen by a larger audience. I make efforts to show clearly that others’ work is not mine.
In this case, the cartoon was already circulating online or on WhatsApp (public domain) for free, so I am certainly not causing any financial damage to the artist by republishing it, and I can also safely assume that he would appreciate his work being used to open more people’s eyes.
Sometimes I include something like some pages of a book, which does cost money to buy. However I offset any possible issue by encouraging people to please buy the book and I provide the link. In this way I am giving the author free advertising and giving them a net profit. Etc.
2) Regarding copyright laws, when wicked laws are enacted by a lawless government which does not keep their own laws and which enacts laws specifically (as you seem to have noted) in order to cause harm and death to the population, I do not see how there can be a Divine obligation to keep the evil laws. Using a cartoon which is already in the free domain, for example, (without making it seem that I get the credit for someone else’s work), would not make me guilty of “stealing” in the Heavenly Court, just because some wicked lawmaker might possibly define it as a copyright issue.
When it was the “law” to wear masks, some people believed it was a Torah obligation, because of “the law of the land.” But I’m sure you realize that was a big mistake.
“...because I’m careful to attribute material that’s not mine.”
I guess I just know what happened in my own case. The stuff I've been cleaning up in my book manuscript was all attributed from the start. So to the best of my understanding so far, attribution wasn't enough. There is a thing called fair use in U.S. copyright law. And beyond that loosely defined amount (“fair use”), permission would be needed. So if I'm understanding your reply right, is there something you just learned that supersedes that?
“In addition and to the contrary, it is very likely that the authors or artists whose work I present would want their work to be seen by a larger audience.”
That would probably make sense. But I'm not accusing all of U.S. copyright law of making sense or being straightforward. Some of it legitimately protects the creators but some of it I think is for protecting the dictatorship.
“...cartoon was already circulating online or on WhatsApp (public domain) for free...”
Many stolen things are circulating online for free and that is how I got myself into trouble, e.g. by watching documentaries that were free on the YouTube which I found out later were actually pirated. A person may be able to right click and copy an image and put it on their site. But did they have permission? Or (without needing to get permission) did they find a written statement by the creator saying “everything on this page can be freely used by others in their derivative works,” etc.?
Also I wanted to ask what it is that causes you to say that things on WhatsApp fit the legal definition of public domain.
“Sometimes I include something like some pages of a book, which does cost money to buy. However I offset any possible issue by encouraging people to please buy the book and I provide the link. In this way I am giving the author free advertising and giving them a net profit.”
I'll just point out this is exactly the kind of thing for which I have been making restitution for theft recently. I'm sure the authors would like my free advertising, too. But if you didn't ask for permission, copying and including “some pages of a book” is beyond the short quotation limit allowed by “fair use” in U.S. copyright law.
An entire chapter is missing from my book manuscript because I wrote it largely by quoting many parts of a book called Project Soul Catcher Volume 2: Secrets of Cyber and Cybernetic Warfare Revealed by Dr. Robert Duncan. (This revealed back in ~2010 the little-known weapon being used to torture human beings at a distance to make them willing to do the mass shootings we've seen in the USA because obviously, the gun control push is both the *cause* and the *intended result* of the mass shootings; and obviously, the shootings have been organized for years by a certain group but portrayed by legacy media as one unrelated lone wolf after another). I went to great lengths to contact the author for permission but apparently without success. I wrote a letter to an address he once had and it got returned to the sender. Apparently, the email address I found for the author didn't work. I even made a Facebook account just to see if that would be a way to write a message to him. But that account got terminated in about one to two hours. If I can't reach the author, I figure I can strongly recommend the book and explain why people should read the book and say what happened (as described above) in my attempts at contacting and make that my chapter if contacting attempts failed.
Chabad.org gave me replies about using quotations of verses from their extremely popular and widely used online Tanach (https://www.chabad.org/library/bible_cdo/aid/63255/jewish/The-Bible-with-Rashi.htm). They said it was allowed to use up to a certain number of verses for my music video but that for using them in print, I would have to be in contact with the publishing company (Judaica Press). In other words, they were able to give permission (permission granted) for the music video but not for using in print for my handout “FAQs from Christians” (permission cannot be granted; ask elsewhere). So that necessitated contacting Judaica Press to get permission.
Also I wanted to ask how you would show that using pages from a book would not cause damage to the author. I certainly understand the point that you're making that it would be like free advertising and I suspect that's the way things would probably go. But what if readers thought, “Well, I respect this author of In G-d's Army There's Only Truth so much that now that I have this bit of a summary with a few relevant quotations, I won't have the buy the book and spend the time since I now know the main points I need to know. There are only so many hours in the day.”? My book manuscript is extremely long so maybe people would think, “Well, now that I've read this chapter, I have all I need and won't have to buy the book. I'm tired, anyway. That stuff was ugly to learn about.” But if I didn't have permission from the author, which I still don't, maybe that would be one less customer and also publishing several pages without his permission (far beyond the definition of fair use) so a violation of copyright law of the land.
Point 2, Lawless Government:
“Regarding copyright laws, when wicked laws are enacted by a lawless government which does not keep their own laws and which enacts laws specifically (as you seem to have noted) in order to cause harm and death to the population, I do not see how there can be a Divine obligation to keep the evil laws.”
So keeping the copyright laws in the USA presents a great challenge but not an impossible one. Getting permission is not evil and doesn't force someone to go against the Torah as far as I know. For the most part, I learn both with my local rabbi here in Oregon and my New Jersey rabbi, Rabbi Yitzchok Dovid Smith. And Rabbi Smith showed us that the mandates and lockdowns were a direct attack on the Torah (prevented gathering at a shul, visiting a sick person, prayer in a minyan for Jewish men, learning in yeshivah, etc. etc.). Getting permission meticulously is pretty challenging but, as far as I can tell, doesn't force someone to negate a mitzvah (commandment), whether that mitzvah is a Jewish one or a non-Jewish one. But possibly I'm missing something here. So are we then supposed to keep the things we can keep which don't try to directly stop people from doing a commandment? Is it fair to say that the test for whether we can ignore a law of the land is only whether it violates the Torah, not merely whether it makes sense or is annoying? Let's not take an extreme example like murder. How about speeding on a roadway. Aren't we supposed to go the speed limit whenever possible since there's nothing about that law that makes people violate the Torah? If a person has to speed for safety in an extreme scenario, he must. But otherwise, he should follow that law. Right? Now the copyright stuff is far less convenient than going the speed limit. But if it doesn't make any Jew or non-Jew violate the Torah relevant to him or her, then isn't it true it should be kept?
Anyway, thanks for replying and maybe you could print this out for your rabbi and ask about these other details I mentioned because I want to know, also. Maybe there isn't just one way to be Torah-observant in this arena. I'm not saying I know the answers but am trying. Have a good Shabbos.
Amazing how one can be very accurate, up to the minute details, about the deceptions of the WHO, the world governments on Covid, euthanasia, drugs, surveillance, lockdowns, 5G cities, etc, etc, but when it comes to Israel, can be simultaneously blinded to the truth, the Oct. 7th attack, the lies and lies and lies of the palestinians!!!! I would call him Vermin, not Vernon.
Brucha, please look into his talks on this. The same goes for Meryl Nass. Such a brilliant woman whose investigations are detailed to the last degree, but to look at the Israeli side of the coin?--never! The ultimate hypocrisy!
I'm interested to know how New York State expects these "consenting minors" to pay for the procedures, injections, and drugs their parents have been refused the right to be informed of and to permit or refuse permission for.
Kathleen: All the tranny medical treatments, drugs & surgeries were written explicitly into Obamacare years ago. That has made most of this possible with school-aged kids nationwide. People need to wake up and recognize the planned nature of these various tactical assaults designed to advance by incrementalism & to eventually intersect with the OTHER strategems. The demonic Left plays 12-dimensional chess while the largely willfully ignorant conservatives barely play checkers.
THEY are not the real problem WE are.
We accepted mass schooling - long term physical, mental, moral, emotional and spiritual abuse of innocent children in detention centres and concentration camps - mass indoctrination in atheistic state propaganda!
We accepted mass contraception - anti-life initiatives - regardless of the consequences for the newly conceived baby or the woman's health and future fertility.
We accepted mass abortion, via contraceptive abortion of the newly conceived, right up to full-term.
Now WE have a problem with what THEY are doing to us.
Time to take accountability.
Time to truly repent.
Yes, I was thinking the same thing as I was reading that. We have gone along with these agendas for far too long. Now it will bite us in the butt if we are not careful.
I checked the background of Vernon Coleman. I've seen previous verification of a lot of his statements on governments pushing euthanasia, so I can say he is telling the truth here. But I have deep misgivings about recommending his site as a truth source.
His Bitchute channel and his personal website contain a lot of absolute rubbish relating to Israel. Some examples:
https://www.vernoncoleman.com/anyonesupporting.htm
https://www.vernoncoleman.com/israeljews.htm
https://www.bitchute.com/video/OHjhMVfq9fDu/
Apparently he knows that his 'genocide' accusations won't stand up to the truth -- his videos accusing the WHO and other global enemies of humanity allow viewer comments, while his Israel-bashing vid is the only one where he has blocked feedback.
Just thought you might want to know, Brucha.
Hannah: Yep, he has outed himself as an antisemite, as have an ASTONISHING number of people who have been activists in the Covid Era fight for freedom from medical tyranny. I use the 12-Step Program guidance to "take what you like and leave the rest". I just shared this video while conceding that Dr. Coleman is antisemitic BUT underscoring that he is spot on in this video focused only on the growing strategic roll-out of legalized medical murder.
ditto!!!!!
Whenever I hear antisemite I can't help but think of the kazarian Mafia... or zionist government vs the People. Just saying '
Well, Professor Stevanovitch, whenever I hear "Khazarian Mafia" I can't help but think of the various intellectual enthusiasms of the famous FICTION WRITER who embroidered & published his never-substantiated, un-scholarly hypotheses as purported "history" of Ashkenazi Jews. At different times in his life, Arthur Koestler cycled through strong intellectual commitments to communism, euthanasia, anti-communism, etc. until finally killing himself in a suicide-pact with his much younger wife. But I feel sure that YOU, Professor Stevanovitch, can provide us with the sources, citations, substantiating evidence, formal documentation, and proper historical scholarship hidden from us all in the interim 50 years since Koestler wrote his Parvum Opus about the "Khazarian Mafia" on which you have such expertise.
Blessin's to Brucha for gettin' the important message out!
Thanks ta you Hannah fer lettin' us all know 'bout this "side" of Dr. Coleman--nooz ta me as well. It's chilly at best, mis-understandin' a lot fer sure... ugly (velly) at worst.
BUT I myself am nevertheless tootin' Dr "Coal-Man in the Colemine's" horn on this one announcement-- 'bout the dire message re. euthanasia that Brucha too is sharin' herewith--Cuz it's far beyond killin' us all with just the clot shots that we already are aware've--it's downright murder--an' we're all affected--Jews too!
So IMO alerts first, quibble with the rest later! (I do so myself--in the comments! I take a lotta heat fer speakin' well of us "chews" against the "uninformed" even tho' I myself'd like ta see BibiGUN strung up on a string of clot shots 'n green passes pronto. No fan of that puppet am I.
But triage is essential. We're livin' in the Emergency Room (the entire world is one in some ways). Dire warnin's first, fightin' the haters later (b/c they'ze always around...sigh)
Whatever ya do--stay away from hoss-spit-alls, MSM, social workers (many are now rat finks), clinics, an' "skools!" It's all bein' monetized.... Zei gezundt!
ps I write "funny" i.e. in the vernacular fer many reasons includin' that I'm an act-teur an' it keeps the bots away but here I'm "dead serious"--pun aside--cuz they DO wanna kill us all (oy)
Re: Liability in the Heavenly Court for theft of copyrighted material
Dear Mrs. Weisberger,
Since I'm a ben Noach, I thought you might want to know that many people have not had the occasion to learn how very extremely strict U.S. copyright law really is and I would ask (just for starters) if you got permission or otherwise proved there isn't need for permission for the use of that cartoon at the very beginning of this article.
I had my entire 2019 book manuscript, Jews: Go Long! | A Report on the Practicality and Desirability of the Final Redemption (which to a significant degree predicted something like the lockdowns to happen in the near future, which it did), up for free as a PDF on my website for a long time but it's down now except for Chapter 3 because there are still copyright concerns I have to address. This is a ninth draft so copyright was already worked on in previous drafts with the teeth of the fine-toothed comb getting increasingly finer.
Exposing lies is very important but how will HaShem make that effort prosper if there is inadvertent theft along the way? You've been doing a lot of hard work but I wanted to make sure it will fully succeed. Not accusing but just pointing out many have not had a chance to learn that the laws of the land are very extreme in this area.
It is truly daunting to know just how much stuff is copyrighted. News clips are not public domain. Legacy media are run by CIA so why would they give permission to a documentary filmmaker (short of a miracle) to make a critical work with clips from their original propaganda? But even that miracle could happen. The point: the U.S. government engineers sin into the fabric of the dictatorship with the goal that we will be constantly deserving in the Heavenly Court of having tyranny. Theft is one example so they try to restrict everything that shouldn't be restricted by copyright in that way. I'm not saying it's not daunting. But I wanted to know if you were aware and being careful about this. Many people simply have not had the occasion to learn how many things are copyrighted. I've been working for years on doing restitution for theft, usually paying groups that I don't want to see make any money because my rabbi told me it has to be paid back and this even is a higher priority than charity and charity has to be put on hold to pay them back!!!
You may be interested, by the way, to read my most recent report about the middah kineged middah aspects of a certain topic. The report is called Abortion and Gun Control: Cause and Effect. Imagine how much freedom can be won by mankind understanding the sin theory of dictatorship and embracing the repentance theory of freedom, whether the arena is abortion or theft or something else entirely where actions have to be corrected.
Stay tuned for my upcoming music video album mainly on shmiras halashon (guarding the tongue/not gossiping--and gossip is defined as being 100% true!) and the miraculous physical illness G-d used to alert me to its great importance. The project uses humor related to our family dog to lure unsuspecting people into watching it because I once saw someone take a bite of soap that looked like candy. If some people really think they don't want Torah, I decided to disguise it as entertainment.
Moshiach NOW
John
Insulting Consulting
BS”D
Thank you Mr. Hingson. I hold your fear of Heaven in high regard and sincerely appreciate your taking the time to write to me about this topic.
I checked with my Rabbi and found that the concern you presented is in actuality two separate issues.
1) Theft:
My Rabbi said that I’m clear of theft concerns, because I’m careful to attribute material that’s not mine.
My remarks: When I present someone else’s material but I give them credit for it, and I do not take away profit that they would have earned on the material had I not published it, I am not “stealing.” In addition and to the contrary, it is very likely that the authors or artists whose work I present would want their work to be seen by a larger audience. I make efforts to show clearly that others’ work is not mine.
In this case, the cartoon was already circulating online or on WhatsApp (public domain) for free, so I am certainly not causing any financial damage to the artist by republishing it, and I can also safely assume that he would appreciate his work being used to open more people’s eyes.
Sometimes I include something like some pages of a book, which does cost money to buy. However I offset any possible issue by encouraging people to please buy the book and I provide the link. In this way I am giving the author free advertising and giving them a net profit. Etc.
2) Regarding copyright laws, when wicked laws are enacted by a lawless government which does not keep their own laws and which enacts laws specifically (as you seem to have noted) in order to cause harm and death to the population, I do not see how there can be a Divine obligation to keep the evil laws. Using a cartoon which is already in the free domain, for example, (without making it seem that I get the credit for someone else’s work), would not make me guilty of “stealing” in the Heavenly Court, just because some wicked lawmaker might possibly define it as a copyright issue.
When it was the “law” to wear masks, some people believed it was a Torah obligation, because of “the law of the land.” But I’m sure you realize that was a big mistake.
Keep up your good work and G-d bless you.
Thank you.
And just as a quick reply:
Point 1, Theft:
“...because I’m careful to attribute material that’s not mine.”
I guess I just know what happened in my own case. The stuff I've been cleaning up in my book manuscript was all attributed from the start. So to the best of my understanding so far, attribution wasn't enough. There is a thing called fair use in U.S. copyright law. And beyond that loosely defined amount (“fair use”), permission would be needed. So if I'm understanding your reply right, is there something you just learned that supersedes that?
“In addition and to the contrary, it is very likely that the authors or artists whose work I present would want their work to be seen by a larger audience.”
That would probably make sense. But I'm not accusing all of U.S. copyright law of making sense or being straightforward. Some of it legitimately protects the creators but some of it I think is for protecting the dictatorship.
“...cartoon was already circulating online or on WhatsApp (public domain) for free...”
Many stolen things are circulating online for free and that is how I got myself into trouble, e.g. by watching documentaries that were free on the YouTube which I found out later were actually pirated. A person may be able to right click and copy an image and put it on their site. But did they have permission? Or (without needing to get permission) did they find a written statement by the creator saying “everything on this page can be freely used by others in their derivative works,” etc.?
Also I wanted to ask what it is that causes you to say that things on WhatsApp fit the legal definition of public domain.
“Sometimes I include something like some pages of a book, which does cost money to buy. However I offset any possible issue by encouraging people to please buy the book and I provide the link. In this way I am giving the author free advertising and giving them a net profit.”
I'll just point out this is exactly the kind of thing for which I have been making restitution for theft recently. I'm sure the authors would like my free advertising, too. But if you didn't ask for permission, copying and including “some pages of a book” is beyond the short quotation limit allowed by “fair use” in U.S. copyright law.
An entire chapter is missing from my book manuscript because I wrote it largely by quoting many parts of a book called Project Soul Catcher Volume 2: Secrets of Cyber and Cybernetic Warfare Revealed by Dr. Robert Duncan. (This revealed back in ~2010 the little-known weapon being used to torture human beings at a distance to make them willing to do the mass shootings we've seen in the USA because obviously, the gun control push is both the *cause* and the *intended result* of the mass shootings; and obviously, the shootings have been organized for years by a certain group but portrayed by legacy media as one unrelated lone wolf after another). I went to great lengths to contact the author for permission but apparently without success. I wrote a letter to an address he once had and it got returned to the sender. Apparently, the email address I found for the author didn't work. I even made a Facebook account just to see if that would be a way to write a message to him. But that account got terminated in about one to two hours. If I can't reach the author, I figure I can strongly recommend the book and explain why people should read the book and say what happened (as described above) in my attempts at contacting and make that my chapter if contacting attempts failed.
Chabad.org gave me replies about using quotations of verses from their extremely popular and widely used online Tanach (https://www.chabad.org/library/bible_cdo/aid/63255/jewish/The-Bible-with-Rashi.htm). They said it was allowed to use up to a certain number of verses for my music video but that for using them in print, I would have to be in contact with the publishing company (Judaica Press). In other words, they were able to give permission (permission granted) for the music video but not for using in print for my handout “FAQs from Christians” (permission cannot be granted; ask elsewhere). So that necessitated contacting Judaica Press to get permission.
Also I wanted to ask how you would show that using pages from a book would not cause damage to the author. I certainly understand the point that you're making that it would be like free advertising and I suspect that's the way things would probably go. But what if readers thought, “Well, I respect this author of In G-d's Army There's Only Truth so much that now that I have this bit of a summary with a few relevant quotations, I won't have the buy the book and spend the time since I now know the main points I need to know. There are only so many hours in the day.”? My book manuscript is extremely long so maybe people would think, “Well, now that I've read this chapter, I have all I need and won't have to buy the book. I'm tired, anyway. That stuff was ugly to learn about.” But if I didn't have permission from the author, which I still don't, maybe that would be one less customer and also publishing several pages without his permission (far beyond the definition of fair use) so a violation of copyright law of the land.
Point 2, Lawless Government:
“Regarding copyright laws, when wicked laws are enacted by a lawless government which does not keep their own laws and which enacts laws specifically (as you seem to have noted) in order to cause harm and death to the population, I do not see how there can be a Divine obligation to keep the evil laws.”
So keeping the copyright laws in the USA presents a great challenge but not an impossible one. Getting permission is not evil and doesn't force someone to go against the Torah as far as I know. For the most part, I learn both with my local rabbi here in Oregon and my New Jersey rabbi, Rabbi Yitzchok Dovid Smith. And Rabbi Smith showed us that the mandates and lockdowns were a direct attack on the Torah (prevented gathering at a shul, visiting a sick person, prayer in a minyan for Jewish men, learning in yeshivah, etc. etc.). Getting permission meticulously is pretty challenging but, as far as I can tell, doesn't force someone to negate a mitzvah (commandment), whether that mitzvah is a Jewish one or a non-Jewish one. But possibly I'm missing something here. So are we then supposed to keep the things we can keep which don't try to directly stop people from doing a commandment? Is it fair to say that the test for whether we can ignore a law of the land is only whether it violates the Torah, not merely whether it makes sense or is annoying? Let's not take an extreme example like murder. How about speeding on a roadway. Aren't we supposed to go the speed limit whenever possible since there's nothing about that law that makes people violate the Torah? If a person has to speed for safety in an extreme scenario, he must. But otherwise, he should follow that law. Right? Now the copyright stuff is far less convenient than going the speed limit. But if it doesn't make any Jew or non-Jew violate the Torah relevant to him or her, then isn't it true it should be kept?
Anyway, thanks for replying and maybe you could print this out for your rabbi and ask about these other details I mentioned because I want to know, also. Maybe there isn't just one way to be Torah-observant in this arena. I'm not saying I know the answers but am trying. Have a good Shabbos.
Amazing how one can be very accurate, up to the minute details, about the deceptions of the WHO, the world governments on Covid, euthanasia, drugs, surveillance, lockdowns, 5G cities, etc, etc, but when it comes to Israel, can be simultaneously blinded to the truth, the Oct. 7th attack, the lies and lies and lies of the palestinians!!!! I would call him Vermin, not Vernon.
Brucha, please look into his talks on this. The same goes for Meryl Nass. Such a brilliant woman whose investigations are detailed to the last degree, but to look at the Israeli side of the coin?--never! The ultimate hypocrisy!
State Senator Blakespeer has introduced legislation to expand assisted suicide in California recently.
We pay for everything everywhere😡
I'm interested to know how New York State expects these "consenting minors" to pay for the procedures, injections, and drugs their parents have been refused the right to be informed of and to permit or refuse permission for.
Kathleen: All the tranny medical treatments, drugs & surgeries were written explicitly into Obamacare years ago. That has made most of this possible with school-aged kids nationwide. People need to wake up and recognize the planned nature of these various tactical assaults designed to advance by incrementalism & to eventually intersect with the OTHER strategems. The demonic Left plays 12-dimensional chess while the largely willfully ignorant conservatives barely play checkers.