There may be evidence of the pregnancy and testes health from studies but it reminds me of all that evidence that showed dropping dead adults SAD was to do with shoveling snow, having sex, running, exercise etc.
It’s to do with anything and everything BUT THE JAB.
To see for sure, we would need Ed Dowd to do an insurance scan of excess negative pregnancy outcomes in surgical and dental staff who regularly wear masks for hours per day.
We DO know for sure that masks are useless, (multiple studies, even from many decades ago), and they lower the blood oxygen level while increasing carbon dioxide. We know that this makes the blood more acidic, putting people at much higher risk of many bad outcomes. We know that lower oxygen in the lungs makes them much more vulnerable to infection.
We know that we FEEL dizzy and disoriented and “I-can’t-breathe” and this is a bad sign that needs to be paid attention to.
It’s another instance of following our LOGIC over what they try to gaslight and brainwash us into believing.
Thank you for this insight. I have never worn a mask. I do my best to convince others not to do so. In our family get-togethers none of my children or grandchildren ever wore a mask. Some family members were forced to wear them at school or work, unfortunately. One of my granddaughters fought against it, but I don't know if she was successful, or whether they just dropped the mandate shortly thereafter.
I understand that many many many do not like at all wearing masks. But masks do work. And in working they have limits, they are not perfect, but that is the similar thing with ALL things. Nothing is perfect in it's designated usage, all hammers can still hit thumbs.
There are many many many many studies, and many many many published studies. But imo, fewer fewer good studies, especially today. Institutionalized bias and group virtue signalling are the "THIS IS SCIENCE" of our era, a depravedly insane time, unique in human history.
Co2 abounds. Plants imbibe it and create oxygen which we animals need. There are many markers of levels of Co2 as to toxic effects, but little REAL and reliable measurement of Co2 levels in the masked.
Equally importantly, masks have been a HUGE part of the psychological operation meant to distance people from each other emotionally, divide us, and create fear of one another. Which is the basis of their Transhumanist agenda and all the evil they want to do.
Yes, masks do isolate. Moses wore a mask. He was too 'hot' to handle! Blindingly elevated, hard for regular folks to handle. And masks are a constant of Purim. This suggests that there's more to the masking picture, or masking zeitgeist.
Myself I advise folks NOT to mask when they are infectious because they are only UPPING the dose of infectant they are re-ingesting, and doing so before the immune system is spun up fully, and in most, already weak (because they caught it already, suggesting a weakended immunity) and weakened more by the attack.
I also have advised that kids below puberty should not mask (this is a seperated pleading from the paragraph above) because early studies showed that their breath exhaust is far lower than an adult, due to the mucous layer in the voice box not popping apart into droplets as it does after puberty. In addtion children in language uptake mode NEED to see the full face and show their full face. I never thought that ANY human under 8 should wear a mask.
There are many forms of isolation and lonleyness. The two decades or so PRIOR to the heavy blanket of Covid worldwide were remarkable in human history because more humans than every before everywhere were living alone. Covid and dysfunctioning human and social relations since have just worsened that considerably.
But i won't argue the science--I think everyone is beyond that at this point anyway--people just hold to their particular view after 3 years.
But i'd like to comment on the "Moses wore a mask" point of view.
I refused to wear masks, after reading the torah section/s between the golden calf incident up through Moses covering his face, so found it interesting you came to a different conclusion from the same events.
My logic was twofold. One, the very word we get our English word "mask" from, is the Hebrew word "masecha" -- usually translated idol or graven image--and is in fact the modern Hebrew word for mask. Historically, masks have been used since ancient times in pagan rituals.
So aside from the creepiness factor or any science --I felt like masks for covid clearly became cultic symbols/idols, trusting in some human creation to save us rather than Hashem. Then just a little while later--when Moses has to be shielded from even seeing G-d's "back"--and still, the intensity was so great--he in turn was glowing and had to shield Bnai Israel from seeing his own face after viewing just a glimpse of the Holy One.
We are all created in God's own image--b'tselem Elokim--and 100% believe that masks are an attempt by these evil murderers to hide the very image of G-d that we see in other human faces, and I especially believed this because the masecha--the idol--was in such close proximity in the Torah to Moses shielding the Israelites from viewing his own face after being so recently physically exposed to the One in whose image we all are created.
So I refused to participate in what I saw as idol worship.
Everyone is entitled to their own point of view of course, I just found it interesting we drew the opposite conclusions from the same part of Torah.
Covid is about the mouth, mostly. A bit about the eyes. Mostly about the mouth and the mucus tissues there and in the oral-nasal area. One early report from Hong Kong, before the troubles there, was that mask wearers who wore glasses were 80% less likely than non-glass wearers to get Covid. Spectacles are a protection for the eye, a mask. But mostly we get infected from what comes out the mouths of others into our own mouth. This is a severe rebuke about Lashon Hara, I do say. A plague from mouth to mouth.
They don’t work. That was why we never had masking for flu season.
All we have to do is use our logic to see that the pathogens we are trying to protect against go right through the spaces between the face and the mask, and right through the holes in the weave. It doesn’t make sense that they could work.
The studies PRIOR to covid showed conclusively that masks don’t stop airborne pathogens.
The new studies are certainly manipulated.
Most people who get sick with covid report that they had been masking.
My own doctor told me that they have no place outside the operating room, to protect an open wound from a sneeze.
Afterwards, I even saw a study conducted across operating rooms - I think it may have been in the ‘60’s - which actually ended up showing slightly HIGHER infection rates when the surgeons DID mask as opposed to when they did NOT mask.
Interestingly, my grandmother who survived the Spanish Flu, said that the unmasked were burying the masked.
We never had masking during the Flu season, except during the very nasty Flu commonly labeled the "Spanish Flu". That is best reported as having started in Haskell County, Kansas, USA in spring of 1918, at or near an Army base there as General Pershing was preparing his Million Man Army. We "brought it over, over there". Some of us masked some did not, some were adamant about not masking. When you look into the effect of masking on whole metropolitan eras, then more like 15 minute cities than now -- the read outs are spotty. Some show a a reduction in fatality, others neutral.
In the China-sphere they masked and still mask during flu season. That is the lesson they learned from the very deadly Manchurian Epidemic of 1911. There own England trained southern Chinese doctor, one Wu Lien-teh, came up with suiting up and masking as precautions against the spread. His measures whipped that epidemic.
Masks work. They still work. They have limits. The linked article I provided last post is a very readable engineering and science explanation of how they work. Good of you if you could read it, btw.
some people who have studied 1918 flu much, much deeper than I, have said it was the vaccinated people who got the Spanish Flu, and that new electromagnetic fields (I think from the telegraph ?) also was a contributing factor.
I don't know enough about it to even have a conversation, but Dr Lee Merritt in particular has done a deep dive into it and I've heard her say more than once it was very parallel to what happened with Covid
There's only so deep a well of available information about the 1918 Flu, and it is complicated and obscured by political and emotional 'drop-outs' and cover-ups of the era then, mostly related to Wilson and Pershing's (in the US) and the home offices and war offices (in the UK) efforts to win WWI. Radio was NOT common then, broadcasting stations were few albeit the US Navy's own Annapolis MD station came on air in April 1918 with 350 KW. The FUBAR of Covid was worse, in terms of suppression of realities and propaganda and silencing of alternate and accurate reports, but the FUBAR push down in WWI on influenza information was very nasty and big too.
The telegraphs used wires with under 100-160 volts, but only a few millamps. Low power, not a big radiation footprint.
I am no fan of the upper bands of 5G in terms of health effect long term. And I am surprised NOT to see more health damage in populations with cell phones. But the impact of EMF in those ranges MUST have some negative impacts, so everyone should take more melatonin to counter, I posit.
the reason posited that the telegraphs affected humans with EMFs is that they had never been exposed to those frequencies before..a lot of the telegraph operators were recruited from rural communities with no electricity in their homes, so the previous farm-dwellers had not adapted to those frequencies yet.
The Invisible Rainbow by Arthur Firstenberg (sp?) goes into it more deeply--and there's some sort of chart in the book that shows how every rollout of a new frequency--radio waves, 2g, 3g etc was followed by a flu-type epidemic. It was interesting, as was the book.
PS yes Dr Merritt has mentioned how she was shocked to find such synced propaganda in old newspapers about the 1918 flu. She had previously been under the impression the "mockingbird" media was a more recent phenomenon.
There may be evidence of the pregnancy and testes health from studies but it reminds me of all that evidence that showed dropping dead adults SAD was to do with shoveling snow, having sex, running, exercise etc.
It’s to do with anything and everything BUT THE JAB.
To see for sure, we would need Ed Dowd to do an insurance scan of excess negative pregnancy outcomes in surgical and dental staff who regularly wear masks for hours per day.
We DO know for sure that masks are useless, (multiple studies, even from many decades ago), and they lower the blood oxygen level while increasing carbon dioxide. We know that this makes the blood more acidic, putting people at much higher risk of many bad outcomes. We know that lower oxygen in the lungs makes them much more vulnerable to infection.
We know that we FEEL dizzy and disoriented and “I-can’t-breathe” and this is a bad sign that needs to be paid attention to.
It’s another instance of following our LOGIC over what they try to gaslight and brainwash us into believing.
Thank you for this insight. I have never worn a mask. I do my best to convince others not to do so. In our family get-togethers none of my children or grandchildren ever wore a mask. Some family members were forced to wear them at school or work, unfortunately. One of my granddaughters fought against it, but I don't know if she was successful, or whether they just dropped the mandate shortly thereafter.
I wonder if all the mask wearing has lowered co2 emissions.
😂
hahaha good one ☝🏽 😂
I understand that many many many do not like at all wearing masks. But masks do work. And in working they have limits, they are not perfect, but that is the similar thing with ALL things. Nothing is perfect in it's designated usage, all hammers can still hit thumbs.
But masks do work and work well. They do absorb and block infectants and toxic dusts and aerosols. They work down to very small sizes. See https://smartairfilters.com/en/blog/can-masks-capture-coronavirus/
There are many many many many studies, and many many many published studies. But imo, fewer fewer good studies, especially today. Institutionalized bias and group virtue signalling are the "THIS IS SCIENCE" of our era, a depravedly insane time, unique in human history.
Co2 abounds. Plants imbibe it and create oxygen which we animals need. There are many markers of levels of Co2 as to toxic effects, but little REAL and reliable measurement of Co2 levels in the masked.
Equally importantly, masks have been a HUGE part of the psychological operation meant to distance people from each other emotionally, divide us, and create fear of one another. Which is the basis of their Transhumanist agenda and all the evil they want to do.
Yes, masks do isolate. Moses wore a mask. He was too 'hot' to handle! Blindingly elevated, hard for regular folks to handle. And masks are a constant of Purim. This suggests that there's more to the masking picture, or masking zeitgeist.
Myself I advise folks NOT to mask when they are infectious because they are only UPPING the dose of infectant they are re-ingesting, and doing so before the immune system is spun up fully, and in most, already weak (because they caught it already, suggesting a weakended immunity) and weakened more by the attack.
I also have advised that kids below puberty should not mask (this is a seperated pleading from the paragraph above) because early studies showed that their breath exhaust is far lower than an adult, due to the mucous layer in the voice box not popping apart into droplets as it does after puberty. In addtion children in language uptake mode NEED to see the full face and show their full face. I never thought that ANY human under 8 should wear a mask.
There are many forms of isolation and lonleyness. The two decades or so PRIOR to the heavy blanket of Covid worldwide were remarkable in human history because more humans than every before everywhere were living alone. Covid and dysfunctioning human and social relations since have just worsened that considerably.
i'm surprised you think they work after all the studies that show no positive effects/harmful effects-like in the 150+ studies here: https://brownstone.org/articles/more-than-150-comparative-studies-and-articles-on-mask-ineffectiveness-and-harms/
But i won't argue the science--I think everyone is beyond that at this point anyway--people just hold to their particular view after 3 years.
But i'd like to comment on the "Moses wore a mask" point of view.
I refused to wear masks, after reading the torah section/s between the golden calf incident up through Moses covering his face, so found it interesting you came to a different conclusion from the same events.
My logic was twofold. One, the very word we get our English word "mask" from, is the Hebrew word "masecha" -- usually translated idol or graven image--and is in fact the modern Hebrew word for mask. Historically, masks have been used since ancient times in pagan rituals.
So aside from the creepiness factor or any science --I felt like masks for covid clearly became cultic symbols/idols, trusting in some human creation to save us rather than Hashem. Then just a little while later--when Moses has to be shielded from even seeing G-d's "back"--and still, the intensity was so great--he in turn was glowing and had to shield Bnai Israel from seeing his own face after viewing just a glimpse of the Holy One.
We are all created in God's own image--b'tselem Elokim--and 100% believe that masks are an attempt by these evil murderers to hide the very image of G-d that we see in other human faces, and I especially believed this because the masecha--the idol--was in such close proximity in the Torah to Moses shielding the Israelites from viewing his own face after being so recently physically exposed to the One in whose image we all are created.
So I refused to participate in what I saw as idol worship.
Everyone is entitled to their own point of view of course, I just found it interesting we drew the opposite conclusions from the same part of Torah.
Covid is about the mouth, mostly. A bit about the eyes. Mostly about the mouth and the mucus tissues there and in the oral-nasal area. One early report from Hong Kong, before the troubles there, was that mask wearers who wore glasses were 80% less likely than non-glass wearers to get Covid. Spectacles are a protection for the eye, a mask. But mostly we get infected from what comes out the mouths of others into our own mouth. This is a severe rebuke about Lashon Hara, I do say. A plague from mouth to mouth.
Mask your words!
They don’t work. That was why we never had masking for flu season.
All we have to do is use our logic to see that the pathogens we are trying to protect against go right through the spaces between the face and the mask, and right through the holes in the weave. It doesn’t make sense that they could work.
The studies PRIOR to covid showed conclusively that masks don’t stop airborne pathogens.
The new studies are certainly manipulated.
Most people who get sick with covid report that they had been masking.
My own doctor told me that they have no place outside the operating room, to protect an open wound from a sneeze.
Afterwards, I even saw a study conducted across operating rooms - I think it may have been in the ‘60’s - which actually ended up showing slightly HIGHER infection rates when the surgeons DID mask as opposed to when they did NOT mask.
Interestingly, my grandmother who survived the Spanish Flu, said that the unmasked were burying the masked.
We never had masking during the Flu season, except during the very nasty Flu commonly labeled the "Spanish Flu". That is best reported as having started in Haskell County, Kansas, USA in spring of 1918, at or near an Army base there as General Pershing was preparing his Million Man Army. We "brought it over, over there". Some of us masked some did not, some were adamant about not masking. When you look into the effect of masking on whole metropolitan eras, then more like 15 minute cities than now -- the read outs are spotty. Some show a a reduction in fatality, others neutral.
In the China-sphere they masked and still mask during flu season. That is the lesson they learned from the very deadly Manchurian Epidemic of 1911. There own England trained southern Chinese doctor, one Wu Lien-teh, came up with suiting up and masking as precautions against the spread. His measures whipped that epidemic.
Masks work. They still work. They have limits. The linked article I provided last post is a very readable engineering and science explanation of how they work. Good of you if you could read it, btw.
some people who have studied 1918 flu much, much deeper than I, have said it was the vaccinated people who got the Spanish Flu, and that new electromagnetic fields (I think from the telegraph ?) also was a contributing factor.
I don't know enough about it to even have a conversation, but Dr Lee Merritt in particular has done a deep dive into it and I've heard her say more than once it was very parallel to what happened with Covid
There's only so deep a well of available information about the 1918 Flu, and it is complicated and obscured by political and emotional 'drop-outs' and cover-ups of the era then, mostly related to Wilson and Pershing's (in the US) and the home offices and war offices (in the UK) efforts to win WWI. Radio was NOT common then, broadcasting stations were few albeit the US Navy's own Annapolis MD station came on air in April 1918 with 350 KW. The FUBAR of Covid was worse, in terms of suppression of realities and propaganda and silencing of alternate and accurate reports, but the FUBAR push down in WWI on influenza information was very nasty and big too.
The telegraphs used wires with under 100-160 volts, but only a few millamps. Low power, not a big radiation footprint.
I am no fan of the upper bands of 5G in terms of health effect long term. And I am surprised NOT to see more health damage in populations with cell phones. But the impact of EMF in those ranges MUST have some negative impacts, so everyone should take more melatonin to counter, I posit.
the reason posited that the telegraphs affected humans with EMFs is that they had never been exposed to those frequencies before..a lot of the telegraph operators were recruited from rural communities with no electricity in their homes, so the previous farm-dwellers had not adapted to those frequencies yet.
The Invisible Rainbow by Arthur Firstenberg (sp?) goes into it more deeply--and there's some sort of chart in the book that shows how every rollout of a new frequency--radio waves, 2g, 3g etc was followed by a flu-type epidemic. It was interesting, as was the book.
PS yes Dr Merritt has mentioned how she was shocked to find such synced propaganda in old newspapers about the 1918 flu. She had previously been under the impression the "mockingbird" media was a more recent phenomenon.