I don't think there has ever been a scientific or medical justification for any of these vaccines. The arguments always seem to focus around adverse effects and seldom the necessity of any of these shots. So the need is never examined - but ways to improve the safety and effectiveness (which is never tested except by antibody production) are. So the conclusion is to pump more money into the failed experiments vs addressing clean water, sanitation, food availability and preservation, and healthy living.
I don't think there has ever been a scientific or medical justification for any of these vaccines. The arguments always seem to focus around adverse effects and seldom the necessity of any of these shots. So the need is never examined - but ways to improve the safety and effectiveness (which is never tested except by antibody production) are. So the conclusion is to pump more money into the failed experiments vs addressing clean water, sanitation, food availability and preservation, and healthy living.
Your essay is compelling whether the standard is with a preponderance of the evidence or beyond a reasonable doubt.